Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • First begging letter received from Overdales   ;Blah blah blah, our client's are going to win this blah blah blah we supplied all your documents under CPR   PS you can stop all this by paying £1200 less in a lump sum
    • Right,  so the court hasn't send out the Directions Questionnaires/N180s yet. PE's one is a false one, meant to intimidate you into thinking your defence was rubbish and they are confident with their claim. This is par for the course.  The PPCs do this regularly. However, PE have gone further and written that "a copy has also been filed with the court" which is a lie as the court haven't even sent out the papers yet. Keep a screenshot of MCOL, later on in your WS you can draw attention to their lying and abuse of court procedure. If you've got time on your hands, then complain to the BPA about one of their members lying.    
    • We need documents to be uploaded in PDF format. Uploading in Microsoft Word format discloses personal details relating to you which you should not be sharing. Click upload – to understand what to do. How did you pay for the vehicle? You start by saying that you should have walked away – yes you should. Not only because of the reputation of this company but also if the transaction isn't perfect you shouldn't get involved and you certainly shouldn't be taking the word of some used car dealer. Big fail! Why are some of your letter in black and some the in red? When you get some of the ideas in there – have you use a template from somewhere else? They aren't interested in a delay caused by some fire alarm or something. They certainly aren't interested either by the distress you are suffering. They have hundreds of customers who become victims of this kind of thing. All of those customers suffer distress. Big Motoring World don't seem to be very bothered. What are the faults which exist with the vehicle now? Is it just the splashing? Where is the splashing? What is it that is splashing?   Do I also understand that you purchased the vehicle without trying it at all and the first time you were in it and had splashing was after you had made the contract?
    • A claim was issued against you on 22/04/2024 Your acknowledgment of service was submitted on 06/05/2024 at 13:28:08 Your acknowledgment of service was received on 07/05/2024 at 01:05:18 Your defence was submitted on 23/05/2024 at 21:20:03 Your defence was received on 24/05/2024 at 08:05:43
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Miller V Capital One Visa (Part One)


garethmiller
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6344 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Against advice I have decided to claim from my Capital One Visa in two parts as I have all the statements back to January 2004. I issued a pre-lim letter asking for £473.78 back in early sept which is the amount I'm owed for the period of statements I have minus a refund that I was automatically given when I rang up their customer services. I also at the same time submitted a S.A.R for the statements pre-04. I received a reply in late Sept offering £279 to which I replied with an LBA on 29/9/06 accepting only as part payment and requesting the full amount to be paid. A week or so ago I received another reply saying the offer of £279 still stands but they would not be increasing it any further and that this is the last word on the matter.

 

I submitted a claim for £603.49 yesterday (23/10/06) which is the amount owed plus interest and my claim cost.

 

I still haven't had a reply to my S.A.R., I made it clear on my claim that I would be making a further claim for money when Capital One provides the statements requested.

 

Capital One seem to be dragging their heels a bit with my claim on my Mastercard, here's hoping this one will be resolved quicker.

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

How long ago did you send the DPA SAR?

If the 40 days have elapsed have you notified the Infomation Commisioner,

If they do offer you your money back, be careful what you sign for.

Yes they are slow but you must stick to your time scales it may jepodise your claim.

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just gone past 40 days, I'm going to call Cap One tomorrow and find out if and when they are being sent, if i don't get a satisfactory response then I will write to the information commissioner.

 

I know splitting it into two parts could be risky if I'm careless. I made it clear in my claim for Jan 2004 onwards that I would be making a further claim for the Pre 04 period when Capital One provides the required statements.

 

I will not sign any settlement on part one that excludes me from making the further claim.

 

I think a judge will see that I have been reasonable if I make a second claim on this card. I have always made it clear in my letters that I would seek further recompsense should I discover that I am owed further funds.

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its just gone past 40 days, I'm going to call Cap One tomorrow and find out if and when they are being sent, if i don't get a satisfactory response then I will write to the information commissioner.

 

By all means phone but i think you already know what cap 1 will do: 'they will take no notice at all'. and youve given them another day to sit there twidling there thumbs and add more interest to your account. Do you honestly think they would give you a couple more days to meet your payment date without slapping on a charge, if they did we all would'nt be hear now.

 

By all means write, send recorded delivery give them an extra 7 days if you like put in the letter that if you have not got your statements in 7 days, you will inform the imformation commissioner.

 

They have had 40 days, 40 days is a resonable time as laid down in law more than enough time for them to have supplied your statements. They dont have any trouble locating your statement every month with how much you have spent (any where in the world) and find your address, post it and then check if your payment arrives on time.

 

Sorry if it seems harsh but thats the way i see it.

 

AL;-)

-------------------------

CAPITAL ONE * SETTLED*31st Oct 06

HBOS *SETTLED* 8th Oct 06

WOOLWICH *SETTLED*12thJan2007

Monument (Barclays) *SETTLED*10thMar2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Today Capital One Agreed To Pay Up On This Claim As a Gesture Of Goodwill And With No Admission Of Liability The Full Amount Of £603.49

 

CLAIM WON!

 

I also now have the statements from Capital One For The period Pre 2004 so I will be sending a letter to the them today requesting the repayment of this money, and in effect starting Miller V Captal One Visa - Part 2

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Okay now for the story of Part 2, I wrote to Capital One requesting refunding of charges pre-004, they did not respond so I made a claim online at the end of December, Capital One acknowledged the claim and then I received a letter stating I would be receiving a further cheque for £565 which I got on Tuesday this week. Of course they don't admit liability but are paying out to avoid going to court. But now finally after 3 claims my action against Capital One is over and I no longer have any cards with them! now bring on Barclaycard and Halifax!!!!!!

Capital One - Mastercard - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 25/10/06 £878.94

 

Capital One - Visa - Claiming £473.70 and £565

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 21/11/06 603.49

2ND CLAIM PAID IN FULL 30/1/07 £565.00

 

NatWest - Claiming £720

CLAIM PAID IN FULL 18/10/06 £951.06

 

Halifax Part One - Claiming £958

Pre-Lim Sent 11/9/06

Offered £450 28/9/06 - Refused

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...