Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though.     A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees.   https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Bank wants to double my commercial mortgage interest rate – without agreement.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3872 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am completely new to CAG and therefore apologise in advance for any transgressions or mistakes in protocol.

 

I own land which I have been developing over the past few years. Secured on the land are 2 commercial/agricultural mortgages (circa £340K), and an overdraft facility (circa £40K).

 

Having opened the business in the middle of last year, I asked the bank in September 2012 to provide a capital repayment holiday on the mortgages – as the income generated was lower than originally projected and expected, and I could see payment shortfalls looming.

 

The response from the bank was that they wanted to see an updated RICS valuation, and this I asked them to initiate with urgency. Internal bank delays followed and it was not until February 2013 that they were in receipt of the updated RICS valuation. Suffice to say the valuation came in bang on target!

 

After yet another 2 months of delay, the bank eventually increased the overdraft by £15K, of which £10K was immediately snagged back to cover the mortgage payments shortfall which had occurred (as I had already predicted) in the interim period from my initial request.

 

However, from communications received from the bank it now appears that for the benefit of the (net) £5K cash influx, they intend to raise the interest rate on the ENTIRE debt from 2% over base to 4% over base.

 

To say I am aggrieved is an understatement, but before I commence battle I would appreciate any constructive comments from anybody who feels they can provide helpful input.

 

Brian.

Edited by slick132
spaced it out - easier to read
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi BrianR and welcome to CAG

 

Sorry if this is a daft question but have you checked, or are you aware, that the bank can unilaterally vary the interest rate in this manner.

 

How healthy is the loan to value ratio between the borrowings and the RICS valuation, in general terms.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there slick132.

Thank you for the response, it is very much appreciated.

To open I would simply say that "no questions are daft" they are simple expressions for more understanding!!!!

 

To answer your 2 questions in order;

 

1a. I am not sure if the bank has built in clauses in the loan agreement to allow them to unilaterally vary the interest rate (i.e. documents not to hand, and I am also unsure that I could necessarily correctly and legally interpret some vague reference to "clause 123 in para 947, on page 69 - written in cryptic script which can only be read when placed in front of a mirror"!!!). It was my assumption that when agreeing the overall interest rate as "XXX over the bank base rate" my exposure to rate increase which is beyond base rate was locked down.

1b. The bank in question is a UK high street bank (signified by a large eagle, or is in a griffin or a vulture?, on a blue background!). and I assumed perhaps naively I was dealing with them within their standard T&C's).

 

2. When we turn to the matter of the health of the LTV ration, I will advise as follows - total borrowings from the bank (as of this moment) are £380.8K. The RICS valuation as current is £487.5K. In my simplistic understanding this is an LTV ratio of 78%.

 

Hopefully that provides further data to allow you learned people to kick in and assist.

 

Cheers,

Brian.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Brian and thanks for the info.

 

If you have a copy of the loan agreement, it would be worth having a quick skim through to see if they are allowed to increase the interest rates when they feel like it. I note you mention a hike from 2% to 4% over base rate but what is the base rate they refer to.

 

Re the loan to value ratio, I was not so interested in an exact figure, as in knowing how the loan compares to the value generally - ie how close the loan is to the value of the land.

 

It is not unreasonable of the bank to be watching their possible exposure, or indeed to raise the interest rate if the loan to value changes to their detriment. But the bank has a clear duty imposed on it to treat you fairly under the BCOB Regulations. Click on the link to read more about this.

 

Can you confirm approx the new interest rate so we can consider this further. Also let us know if you have the loan agreement available to read.

 

Finally, I assume you're looking to increase the value of the assets over time. Is this a long medium or short term project. The bank will be mindful of how fast the project moves, with a view to you selling on and being able to settle the loan.

 

:-)

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...