Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Daft question - but you filed the defence on-line on MCOL as dx indicated, right?
    • We looked up the e-mail address so communications would be in writing.  If you do stuff on the phone the other party can just deny the contents of the conversation.  They can't deny what's written in an e-mail. So time to sort Pete out.  Check the following for accuracy and change anything I've got wrong.  Then e-mail Pete this evening.  I was thinking of threatening the pub with legal action but let's initially be nice.   Dear Pete, Re: PCN no.XXXXX, claim form no.XXXXX on 23 July 2022 I was a customer at your pub and I attach proof of purchase. I was picking up my cousin Ms XXXXX and her family as she was working as a cook with you at the time.  I entered the pub through the back door, went to the bar, and ordered a drink and a meal.  At no point did any bar staff alert me that I needed to add my registration number or did I see any signs advising me to do so.  I then took a seat outside in a small seated area so I could chat to my cousin while waiting for her to finish work.  We were joined by the management of the pub and bar staff during my time waiting  I was shocked a few days later when I received a demand for £100 from Civil Enforcement Ltd.  i contacted the pub and was told "don't worry, it's not enforceable". Well, that information turned out to be nonsense because I have now received a county court claim form from CEL. I contacted the pub again on XXXXX and was extremely disappointed to be told "there's nothing we can do". Of course there is something you can do.  You are the organ grinder.  You called CEL in.  You can call your dogs off.  Your pub has absolutely superb reviews on Google Maps regarding the way in which you treat guests.  Do you really think customers should be dragged to court?  I'm sure you don't. I am therefore requesting that you intervene and instruct CEL to cease court action. Yours, XXXXX
    • Thank you - Defence has now been filed Doc_20240501_182920_Redacted.pdf
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
    • The US central bank has left interest rates unchanged again, noting a "lack of further progress" toward lowering inflation.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Suspect I have no loan agrrement


Acerfan
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5659 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi campari2, I think the gist of it is that you can try to claim for all you have paid and this might be a bit hit and miss but that you can claim for the any interest and possibly the actual payments from the date they defaulted you but nothing piror to the default - hope this makes sense

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In a similar vein, last September my wife applied for a loan of £2000.00 from Cahoot. They sent the papers out for this and my signed and returned them. After a few days my wife phoned Cahoot to check if they had received the papers. At the time they said that they hadn't.

The agent she spoke to said that she could have received a loan up to the value of £8000.00 if she had preferred :eek:

 

My wife said that it would have been preferable in hindsight, if she had applied for £3000.00. The agent said "No problem, I'll send a new agreement" to which my wife agreed.

 

After a few days the new agreement did not arrive so my wife phoned back and spoke to the same agent. He told her not to worry and he would put the money into her account straight away :eek: :eek: :eek:

 

He told her that if she has any queries over this issue then she should phone and ask to speak to him only.:rolleyes:

 

The money appeared in the account the same day.

 

There is NO WAY WHATSOEVER that Cahoot have a signed agreement for this loan and my wife has been merrily paying it back since.

 

As Cahoot have been extremely difficult to date with charges on my accounts I know what I would do.:lol:

 

My wife however, does not want to get the agent in trouble.

 

What would you do ????

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is helpful to you daipp, but when I worked for a loan company (very, very briefly - they didn't keep me on cos I wouldn't do the hard sell & I hated the job anyway) there was a loan underwriter who forged a signature to get his bonus. He was only caught cos he was bragging about it!!! I'm sure it's happened elsewhere as well, but if it were me, I'd consider why the agent did it & what he might have got for it. Chances are he got a nice commission, and most likely he's not working there anymore - the turnover is generally pretty quick. I'd send off a CCA request & see what they come up with.

I hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

my opinion only but dont companies have a responsibility to train their staff properly and surely any member of staff doing this is unlikely to be acting independently but rather with the full knowledge of supervisors, this may sound rather sceptical but the company is responsible.

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know if this is helpful to you daipp, but when I worked for a loan company (very, very briefly - they didn't keep me on cos I wouldn't do the hard sell & I hated the job anyway) there was a loan underwriter who forged a signature to get his bonus. He was only caught cos he was bragging about it!!! I'm sure it's happened elsewhere as well, but if it were me, I'd consider why the agent did it & what he might have got for it. Chances are he got a nice commission, and most likely he's not working there anymore - the turnover is generally pretty quick. I'd send off a CCA request & see what they come up with.

I hope this helps

 

my opinion only but dont companies have a responsibility to train their staff properly and surely any member of staff doing this is unlikely to be acting independently but rather with the full knowledge of supervisors, this may sound rather sceptical but the company is responsible.

 

Thanks for the prompt replies.

 

Only one thought; what if they have forged my wifes signature.:o

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again daipp,

Sorry, I didn't mean to worry you with my annecdote. I'm sure it doesn't happen very often, I just wanted to highlight that they can be very lax with the rules when it comes to making a 'sale'. I would send off a CCA request & if/when they don't comply, you know they've got nothing and the loan will be unenforceable. As long as you know your wife never signed anything (not even a modifying agreement), then you know there's no agreement to enforce. Did you ever get a copy of the first agreement? If you did, is it the same account number?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again daipp,

Sorry, I didn't mean to worry you with my annecdote. I'm sure it doesn't happen very often, I just wanted to highlight that they can be very lax with the rules when it comes to making a 'sale'. I would send off a CCA request & if/when they don't comply, you know they've got nothing and the loan will be unenforceable. As long as you know your wife never signed anything (not even a modifying agreement), then you know there's no agreement to enforce. Did you ever get a copy of the first agreement? If you did, is it the same account number?

 

No doubt about it whatsoever, my wife NEVER signed anything whatsoever for the £3000.00 loan.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Then I'd get her to send off a CCA request. I can post up the template letter if you need it. There's also A LOT of useful info on CCA requests on these threads: Loan Company Cannot Supply The Original Agreement and Consumer Credit Act Agreements

I hope this helps

 

If you could post it please that would be great !!

 

Many thanks

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi daipp,

Here's the template:

 

[your address]

 

[bank’s address]

 

[Date]

 

Statutory Request under Section 77 or 78 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974

 

Account Number: XXXXXXXXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

Please provide a true copy of the original signed agreement setting up the above numbered account. Also include true copies of any and all documents referred to in the original agreement.

 

Please also provide (as allowed by the Act) a signed statement showing:

 

a) The state of the account

 

b) The total sum which has become payable under the agreement but remains unpaid, and the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date when each became due.

 

c) The total sum which is to become payable under the agreement, the various amounts comprised in that total sum, with the date or mode of determining the date, when each becomes due.

 

I have included the statutory fee of £1 and you have 12 working days from the date of receipt of this letter to provide me with the information requested.

 

Yours faithfully

 

 

 

[your name]

 

As it's a fixed-sum credit agreement eg a loan, your request will be under section 77, if it were a running-account credit agreement, eg credit card or store card it'd be a section 78 request.

 

If they haven't complied within 14 working days (2 for delivery + the 12 statutory days), they're in default and you can withold payment as they cannot enforce the agreement without a court order. If they still haven't complied after a further calender month, then they've committed an offence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dont forget a nice big 14pt Bold heading

 

I do not acknowledge any debt to your company

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Read throught the

FAQ's and when your ready, start a thread in your banks forum to keep us all updated!

If the information I have provided is useful, please click the scales!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just a quick update

 

Letter posted on 01-May-07 and according to Royal Mail website, was received by them on 04-May-07.

 

Therefore, come the 16-May-07, I can move forward. As I know there is no agreement, I'm interested to learn what they'll say.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just a quick update

 

Letter posted on 01-May-07 and according to Royal Mail website, was received by them on 04-May-07.

 

Therefore, come the 16-May-07, I can move forward. As I know there is no agreement, I'm interested to learn what they'll say.

 

David

 

At the moment, Cahoot still haven't replied. Am i correct in thinking I now have to wait until the middle of June (for the extra one month) or is there another letter we should be firing off to Cahoot?

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi daipp,

it's 12 working days once it's been delivered, so I've worked it out at 23rd May (allowing for the bank holiday) as the date they defaulted. After a further calender month (23rd June), if they still haven't complied, they have committed an offence.

 

You have a few options. As they are currently in default, you are within your rights to withhold payment as they are not legally able to enforce the agreement. Section 77 (4) of the CCA 1974 says:

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

If they know the legal implications, they should not default you, but if I were you & decided to withhold payment, I would write to them & state that you're withholding payment due to their non-compliance and the fact that they've defaulted & quote the CCA 1974 as above.

 

However, if you do this, they are more likely to get their act together & (if they have it) send the agreement. Personally, I think it is more effective, and makes you seem more reasonable if you wait until they have committed an offence as you will then have given them more than enough time to comply. You will also then have the satisfaction of telling them they've committed an offence :D

 

In the meantime, there's plenty to read on the subject. If you haven't already, have a good look at the Consumer Credit Act 1974 - you can find it on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

and also the two main threads on CCA requests I mentioned before. There's a lot of useful information there.

 

If you need any more info or help. feel free to ask here or PM me

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jonesy,

They did send the copy, but not the cancellation rights & I don't think they ever sent the copy & cancellation rights at the beginning as per s 63 and 64. Unless 2 copy statements with no covering letter constitute compliance with a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request), they've only got a few days to comply with this before they're in more trouble.

 

This was another debacle - original sent March, returned stating they needed account number etc (which I'd put on letter) & that they only charge £5. So I returned it in April with info highlighted & a £5 cheque. A few days later, I received the 2 statements, & last week I received 2 identical letters saying my request had been passed on, it was free, and if I was requesting information in relation to charges I'd be sent copies of my statements. Funnily enough, I'd love it if they didn't comply - just another nail in the coffin.

 

They've also defaulted me on all of my accounts, adding horrendous charges and taking me further into the red. However, it seems they've only just got around to my letter from April in response to their notice of default letters, so perhaps things will change...

 

To be honest though, I'm not quite sure where to go from here. If I don't get a positive response from their next letter, would you mind if I emailed you for some more of your great advice & to bounce some ideas off you?

 

Cheers,

Acer

 

PS, sorry I didn't pick this up earlier, I was busy kicking my laptop around the room - stupid brick!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi daipp,

it's 12 working days once it's been delivered, so I've worked it out at 23rd May (allowing for the bank holiday) as the date they defaulted. After a further calender month (23rd June), if they still haven't complied, they have committed an offence.

 

You have a few options. As they are currently in default, you are within your rights to withhold payment as they are not legally able to enforce the agreement. Section 77 (4) of the CCA 1974 says:

 

(a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;

and

(b) if the default continues for one month he commits an offence.

 

If they know the legal implications, they should not default you, but if I were you & decided to withhold payment, I would write to them & state that you're withholding payment due to their non-compliance and the fact that they've defaulted & quote the CCA 1974 as above.

 

However, if you do this, they are more likely to get their act together & (if they have it) send the agreement. Personally, I think it is more effective, and makes you seem more reasonable if you wait until they have committed an offence as you will then have given them more than enough time to comply. You will also then have the satisfaction of telling them they've committed an offence :D

 

In the meantime, there's plenty to read on the subject. If you haven't already, have a good look at the Consumer Credit Act 1974 - you can find it on http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/site-questions-suggestions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

and also the two main threads on CCA requests I mentioned before. There's a lot of useful information there.

 

If you need any more info or help. feel free to ask here or PM me

 

Just a thought

 

The loan my wife has is a type of rolling acount where she can if she wishes continue taking amounts out of the loan, make a payment, then take more money out etc.

 

If this is the case, should I be refering to Section 78 of the CCA 1974 ??

 

What do you think??

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Off the top of my head, I'd say it was therefore a running-account credit agreement, (see section 10 of the CCA 1974) and the request should be made under s 78. Did you state just section 77 request on your letter or both section?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Off the top of my head, I'd say it was therefore a running-account credit agreement, (see section 10 of the CCA 1974) and the request should be made under s 78. Did you state just section 77 request on your letter or both section?

 

The second paragraph of my letter said........

 

"I understand that under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (Sections 77−79), I am entitled to receive a copy of the credit agreement on request. I enclose a payment of £1.00 by Postal Order, which represents the fee payable under the Consumer Credit Act."

 

Hopefully, that should cover it.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you've definitely got it covered then. However, I would read through the CCA to check if there's anything specific mentioned about this type of agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sounds like you've definitely got it covered then. However, I would read through the CCA to check if there's anything specific mentioned about this type of agreement.

 

Will do !!

 

Once again, many thanks for your help and assistance in this matter.

 

David

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have posted this on hfc thread but am still having huge problems with hfc and defaults, three altogether on account of one agreement they are chasing but the agreeement they keep sending is not the agreement number they state is owed, none of the dca's have a copy of the agreement either but have placed defaults on file. have sent all the in breach letters and they still refuse to remove defaults.

 

I cannot make out what their latest letter means, Capquest defaulted me in 2003. the agreement copy they have is stamped RECEIVED nov 06, the encl letter from hfc states 'we are writing to inform you that by agreement XXXXX2001 hfc sold and assigned all of its rights....to the above agreement..to Capqeust on XXXX2004.

 

so did they have the agreement in 2001 or 2004 or 2006???

'rise like lions after slumber, in unvanquishable number, shake your chains to the earth like dew, which in sleep had fall'n on you, ye are many, they are few.' Percy Byshse Shelly 1819

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can complain to the Information Commissioners Office to get the defaults removed.

 

 

If there is no Credit Agreement they do not have any right to pass you data in to third persons. ie: credit reference agencies.

 

You can complien to Trading Standards over their failure to comply with you s.78 request.

 

You can stop paying them while and as long as they are in default

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...