Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

jsa stopped


bisous
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3977 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Apologies if this is in the wrong place or is a bit rambly in desperate need of some advice.

 

I've been claiming JSA for around 2 years and I have always done what I was asked to do. I applied for a job with a company and was invited for an interview got asked a few questions and given work to start there and then. I was never offered the job and just took it for granted I had got it, 2 days in however I was asked not to return. I was told I would be paid for the time I spent there so I told the JCP about this because I didn't want it to come back and bite me in the behind, I filled the forms in that I was given and sent them back. Last week one of them came back saying I had told them I had a part time job, I was told to put it in writing about what happened and send evidence to show how much I had been paid, at the time I didn't have any but got my bank statement too and it turns out they didn't pay me. Yesterday I had a letter saying that my JSA cannot be paid from 3 July 2013 because of a recent change. Does this mean I've been sanctioned? And how long will it be for? I have tried to ring them but I get a panic attack every time and end up putting the phone down. I'm such a worrier, I've been up all night in a bit of a state. Any advice would be greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I applied for a job with a company and was invited for an interview got asked a few questions and given work to start there and then. I was never offered the job and just took it for granted I had got it, 2 days in however I was asked not to return. I was told I would be paid for the time I spent there [...] it turns out they didn't pay me. Yesterday I had a letter saying that my JSA cannot be paid from 3 July 2013 because of a recent change. Does this mean I've been sanctioned?

 

You need to write to the (ex)employer asking that monies owed for the two days of work are paid within the next seven days and a payslip is provided - This is what you are entitled to.

 

The DWP letter is a standard format sent out when ever you start work - However, you have only done two days, so they should have completed a rapid reclaim for you. The "we can not pay you JSA..." letter should have stated "for the two days you were working". Don't fret about it, not always easy I know. Ring them up again and explain to them that you should have been put down as a rapid reclaim and that evidence of the two days earnings should follow as soon as the company pays the money owed.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...