Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In both versions the three references to "your clients" near the end need to be changed to "you" or "your" as Alliance are not using solicitors, they have sent the LoC themselves. Personally I'd change "Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept" to "Dear Kev".  It would show you'd done your homework, looked up the company, and seen it's a pathetic one-man band rather than having any departments.  The PPCs love to pretend they have some official power and so you should be scared of them - showing you've sussed their sordid games and you're confident about fighting them undermines all this.  In fact that's the whole point of a snotty letter - to show you'd be big trouble for them if they did do court so better to drop you like a hot potato and go and pursue mugs who just give in instead. In the very, very, very, very unlikely case of Kev doing court, it'd be better that he didn't know in advance all the legal arguments you'd be using, so I'd heavily reduce the number of cards being played.
    • Thanx Londoneill get on to it this evening having a read around these forums I can’t seem to find many success stories using your methods. So how successful are these methods or am I just buying time for him  and a ccj will be inevitable in the end. Thanks another question is, will he have to appear at court..? I am not sure he has got it in him
    • Here's a suggested modified version for consideration by the team. (Not sure whether it still gives too much away?)   RE: PCN 4xxxxx Dear ALLIANCE PARKING Litigation Dept, Thank you for your dubious Letter Of Claim (dated 29th April 2024) of £100 for just 2 minutes of overstay. The family rolled around on the floor in amazement of the idea you actually think they’d accept this nonsense, let alone being confused over the extra unlawful £70 you added. Shall we raise the related VAT issue with HMRC, or perhaps the custodians of the unicorn grain silos? Apart from the serious GDPR breach you’ve made with the DVLA and your complete failure in identifying the driver, we’re dumbfounded that the PCN is still not compliant with the PoFA (2012 Schedule 4 Under Section 9.2.f) even after 12 years of pathetic trial and error. We also doubt a judge would be very impressed at your bone idleness and lack of due diligence regarding parking periods. Especially with no consideration of section 13 in your own trade association's code of practice and the topological nature of the Cornish landscape versus a traditional multi-storey. And don’t even get us started on the invisible signage during the ultra busy bank holiday carnage, that is otherwise known as the random parking chaos in the several unmarked, unmanaged over-spill fields, or indeed the tedious “frustration of contract” attempting to get a data connection to Justpark.  We suggest your clients drop this extreme foolishness or get an absolute hammering in court. We are more than ready to raise the above issues and more, with a fair minded judge, who will most likely laugh your clients out in less time than it takes to capture a couple of useless ANPR photos. If you insist on continuing this stupid, money grabbing quest, after having all of the above pointed out, we will of course show this letter to the Judge and request “an unreasonable costs order” under CPR 27.14.2.g and put it toward future taxis to Harlyn Bay instead.  We all look forward to your clients' deafening silence. Signed, "Spot". (Vehicle Keeper's pet Dalmation).
    • Paying DCA's one penny, never mind £50 per month is a mugs game, they have really been milking him as a cash cow   See where received a claim form is underlined in your post, you need to click, on that and read carefully, then answer the questions, then copy and paste into a post on this thread Forget the CAB ,  their advice is sometimes weird. Is it worth defending? Lowell brought these debts for 10 p in the pound , years ago, because they are flawed. Think about it! if it was such an easy win, Capital one could have taken it to court and crushed him.  It could be an invalid agreement, default notice, or many other things. In a nutshell , yes, and we can help you.
    • Origin moved to EA App... I know this all too well.  Reach out to Customer Services I would to see what they can do. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Eviction for second mortgage, can somebody please help. 10/05


bs0lth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4019 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

You need to make an application for a Time Order - any loan covered by the CCA 1974 can be redefined by the judge. Applying for a time order allows the judge to alter the payment amount, stop the interest, extend the length of time you can pay, or allow you not to pay for a period of time (most usual is to lower your payments for a period of time until you financially recover from whatever has caused the issues to arise).

 

You could just put in a stay application (N244), same as you did previously and explain the situation if, as you say, you are now in a position to pay what was offered previously - but if you are likely to have further problems a time order may be the best way forward.

 

I would strongly suggest that you go to your local CAB office and ask for their help (failing that a law centre).

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The difficulty with asking for advice at the last minute is that often there is no time to respond to queries. I have a full time job, so there was no way I was going to see any of your day time messages.

 

After court proceedings have already started a time order is applied for on an N244, so you can use the same form to apply for the stay and the time order (this is because there is already a possession order on the property).

 

Court staff don't know about the legal procedures, so there is no point in asking them anything - they're not allowed to give any kind of advice that could be construed as legal advice. You must include full details of your income and expenditure with a TO application, you need to tell the judge what you want him to do (e.g. lower the payments, how long for, reschedule payments, lower interest rate etc). You really ought to get some help with this - I don't have time as this is the first opportunity since yesterday to get online and I have other things, so this reply is as good as it gets.

 

Hopefully you've been able to put your application in - if not, then I would suggest you see a local solicitor, even if only for a few minutes brief advice (though it is your home you are fighting for so you may be entitled to legal aid - you need to ask).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Try not to worry too much. My only concern about people asking for help late is that they won't get as much help as they need because those who can help aren't always around at short notice.

 

At least you've been able to gather your information together. I think that a judge will definitely consider the time order if that will help you in the interim. Obviously you also need to look at what you are going to do in the long term and when you'll be able to afford the CMI in full. You also need to look at reclaiming any charges they may have put onto your account. There are lots of threads on the forum relating to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not convinced there is any argument about enforceability - you'd need to see a consumer lawyer to have them look through all the paperwork, not just make a wild claim.

 

I think the charges issue are the way you should go. Get all the charges refunded and you're probably in a much better position. Since this is before the court, they will be obliged to either refund the charges or explain them to the court and have them deemed unfair (they won't risk the latter due to the far-reaching implications for their other customers, and will almost certainly refund).

 

You must pay the CMI plus £25 that the judge ordered you to pay...so however you find that money, it MUST be paid or you will lose out on the opportunity to have your debt reduced (by the removal of the charges).

 

The rest of the stuff you have to do is relatively straightforward - gather the information, put it together in a nicely organised file, with page numbers, and tabs, and provide a copy to the judge (keep one for yourself), and provide a copy to the lender.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Maybe I can help to take-over your arrears with an lease option; where is the property located?

 

thanks

Walid

 

Totally unnecessary - OP doesn't need this kind of 'help'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...