Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Car Insurance Claim Query


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4093 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can someone please explain this to us?

 

Brief details:

 

After 30 plus years of accident free motoring, maximum no claims etc. have recently been involved in a fairly minor accident where the other party basically pulled straight out in front of me from their own driveway resulting in a not too dramatic collision. Obviously not too much to question as to blame etc.

 

Insurance details, name and addresses exchanged no problem. Nobody hurt so police not involved.

 

Next stop = tell insurers and start claim proceedings. This is where it all starts to go Pete Tong.

 

Insurance company took all relevant details no problem but then, instead of starting to process the claim for us, as we expected them to do under the terms of our fully paid up, comprehensive policy, we were advised that in the case of a "non fault claim", which this clearly is, it is their policy to hand the case over to an approved accident management company who will then deal with the remainder of the process.

 

OK. Don't remember being told anything about this when we took out the insurance and can't find any reference to it anywhere in the reams of scrap paper that came with the documents. Decided to go along with it to begin with. Insurance company gave us the name of the management co. and said that the claim would be logged as report only for their own records and no further involvement would now be entered into by them - all future contacts to be made directly to the accident management company.

 

Next step is to arrange a loan car for us to use as our vehicle is not in a roadworthy condition. Also advised that we should not attempt to drive our vehicle from now on and that the accident management company would arrange for it to be removed by them and taken to their nominated repair centre which, for all we know, could be on the moon because nobody seems to want to divulge this obviously highly classified secret squirrel information.

 

I said that, given the opportunity, I would prefer that the vehicle was repaired at a local garage, preferably an independent Land Rover Specialist which we are lucky enough to have just a couple of miles away and with whom we have dealt very happily in the past and who we knew were familiar with working on this type of vehicle.

 

No - sorry - can't do that. It must go where we say. Why?? Because!!!

 

Now - what about this loan car? Don't want one thanks. But you're entitled to one! No thanks - don't want one, got another car anyway so don't need one. But you've got to have one - it's the terms! OK. Still don't want one thanks.

 

End of phone call. Next step - accident management company will now take over all proceedings and will be in touch in due course. In the mean time don't use the vehicle and do nothing.

 

Being ever so slightly not amused and puzzled as to why the company we had paid good money to for a fully comprehensive, bells and whistles insurance policy had basically washed its hands of us and referred us to some management firm we've never heard of, decided to do a bit of Googling.

 

So, it turns out this "accident management specialist" is actually a credit hire company that seems to exist for the sole purpose of ripping off everyone and their grannies with over inflated prices for unnecessary fancy hire cars. On top of that they want you to sign a convoluted credit agreement which, it seems, means that after they have made a complete and utter balls up of handling the claim, they will then come back after us for the hire car charges and any other expenses they may have run up along the way. If we continue to be uncooperative by refusing their nice posh overpriced and un needed hire car, we must alternatively sign up to a repair credit agreement which states that, should they prove unsuccessful in pursuing a settlement against the third party, would render us liable for all repair and other associated costs incurred by them.

 

So - how the hell does this work and, more to the point, how can it be legal?

 

The last accident I had was when I accidentally bumped into Noah in his ark. Since then the insurance companies have cheerfully taken all our premiums for years with no problem, yet now it comes to wanting something back - tough luck - you're on your own mate. Go play with this shower of cowboys!!!

 

I don't want a fancy hire car to pose around in for goodness knows how long while they drag their heels and then end up with a bill similar in size to the national debt of some country you can't pronounce. All I want is our car mended like the bits of paper the insurance company gave out led us to believe and then get on with our lives. Why is that difficult??

 

Seems to me that these days insurance policies aren't worth the paper they're not written on.

 

Hope someone out there can explain this in words of one syllable or less cos it's got me beat.

 

Thanks in anticipation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Two other options.

 

1) Insist that your Insurance company deal with the claim as normal and not to delegate responsibility to a credit hire company, as you don't need a hire car. You may not have to deal with any authorised repairers and can use your local Land Rover garage. See what your policy states about repairs and perhaps call the FOS to see what options your Insurers should offer.

 

2) Deal with the third parties Insurers, who may be willing to deal with your claim, if they agree that their driver was at fault. With this option, you would not have an excess to pay and can probably use your local Land Rover garage. Worth speaking to them, if you have the third parties Insurance details.

 

Quite a few Insurers now delegate many such claims to these credit hire companies, so they don't have to employ so many claims staff and also they earn a commission from any hire car. So if a credit hire company deals with all of the claim, the Insurers will have an income coming in, which mitigates against any claim payouts, without actually having touched the claim much.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about greed, the brokers insist on their own 'helpline', push you onto an overpriced accident management firm, get the kickback. The actual underwriter meanwhile sits in blissful ignorance not having to dip ino their reserves. Everyone's happy and blames claim culture for the rise in premiums, .......now look what you've done !!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's all about greed, the brokers insist on their own 'helpline', push you onto an overpriced accident management firm, get the kickback. The actual underwriter meanwhile sits in blissful ignorance not having to dip ino their reserves. Everyone's happy and blames claim culture for the rise in premiums, .......now look what you've done !!!!

 

He reported the claim to his Insurers not his broker, I'm guessing the OP is with an Admiral group company and he's had the miss fortune to be referred to Albany

Link to post
Share on other sites

He reported the claim to his Insurers not his broker, I'm guessing the OP is with an Admiral group company and he's had the miss fortune to be referred to Albany

 

I would change the FSA regs on what Insurers have to advise consumers at POS about claims handling. If there was a requirement to advise on the use of outside accident management companies on most claims and only being able to use authorised repairers, the consumers can decide if they accept this or not.

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

If you want advice on your thread please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since I discovered the situation that being not at fault in an accident had left us in, I've done a lot of research and also taken some professional advice. As a result, I have solved our own problem by being able to successfully negotiate directly with the third party insurer to arrange repairs to our vehicle and, hopefully, keep everybody's costs in this instance to a minimum. Our vehicle is going to the local Land Rover Specialists, as we originally wanted, to have a sensible repair at a realistic price. In fact, following the conversation today with the Land Rover people I dare say the final cost for the repairs alone will be probably a third of what they would have been had we taken the option originally proposed to us by our own insurance company.

 

So, I have resolved my problem but not without some serious hard work regarding research and obtaining professional advice and I think other people need to be made aware of the problems they are possibly facing should they be unfortunate enough to find themselves in the same situation.

 

I will start a new post to share the information I have gathered and, hopefully, to pre-arm anybody who ends up in the same boat we were in only a few days ago.

 

Many thanks to those of you who took the time to read my original posting and to those who also took the trouble to reply.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...