Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Arkanara v A&L


arkanara
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6253 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Thank you all, you have no idea just what a relief it is to have such supportive people to rely on.

 

Thanks to you guys I shall hand in my Defence with a smile instead of a shaking hand, thats to both the court and the bank!!

 

I 'l keep you all posted.:)

 

Em.

x

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 55
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi all,

 

Defence and AQ submitted to Court on Friday.

 

When I arrived home I had received a letter from the solicitor dealing with the claim. Attached was a copy of the AQ they had submitted and it said they would look forward to receiving a copy of ours? I was aware I had to send them a copy of the defence but no where in my docs did it say I had to send them a copy of the AQ so I didn't. Will this go against us, have I made a big mistake?

Link to post
Share on other sites

No don't worry .

You are not obliged to send a copy of your AQ to the defendent.

However you can send them one as a matter of goodwill.

 

Regards

 

MF5

Halifax Bank plc £1573 settled 19/6/ 06 :D

 

Abbey National PLC

Settled in full £1,754 15/9/06 :grin:

 

Halifax Credit Card £441.63 settled in full 27/10/06 :-)

 

 

Mortgage Express ERP

Pre letter 10/7/06

LBA 27/7/06

MCOL issued 6/9/06

Court Date Feb 06

Lost in court costs awarded £7,500PAYPAL [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just popped in to say good luck, you've been fantasically brave and many other would have given up long before now, so glad you have stuck to your guns and are seeing this through to the bitter end.

 

Won't be long now and hopefully Cumberlands will get their knickers in a twist by the mere fact that you have stood up to their bullying and intimidation!

 

Well done

9/8 - Discovered Consumer Action Group Site:D

 

RBOS - Personal Account

10/8 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to RBOS

17/5 - Defence lodged by RBS

24/5 - Court date

21/5 - Offer received:rolleyes:

22/5 - Offer rejected

25/5 - New offer received and accepted!!!!!!

 

MBNA Credit Card

10/8 - S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to MBNA

Feb 07 Received payment in full...Yeh!!!!:-D

 

RBOS Business Account

25/5 - May 07 - Statements received

23/7 - Offered received

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, it is really scary and without the support of everyone here I would never have been able to stick it out this far.

 

I hope your right Vonnie, i'm also hoping they didn't intend for us to stand up to them.

 

Time will give us the answer!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arkanara.

 

Just remember this ........... It's you taking them to court not the other way round.All you have to lose is your court fees and a bit of time,the rest i.e the money they have already had from you.

 

As I like to say "don't let the tail wag the dog"

 

The way some of these banks and mortgage lenders carry on they can make it feel that way

 

Regards

 

MF5

Halifax Bank plc £1573 settled 19/6/ 06 :D

 

Abbey National PLC

Settled in full £1,754 15/9/06 :grin:

 

Halifax Credit Card £441.63 settled in full 27/10/06 :-)

 

 

Mortgage Express ERP

Pre letter 10/7/06

LBA 27/7/06

MCOL issued 6/9/06

Court Date Feb 06

Lost in court costs awarded £7,500PAYPAL [email protected]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all,

 

Nothing really to report but I came across something while I was looking through their AQ which has made me think a little. They have listed dates they cannot attend court, quite a few actually. Their solicitor must have alot of time off! Listing these is something that makes me think that they do plan to take this seriously and maybe attend court! Would this be unusual for a bank to actually go through with it and attempt defending the claim?

 

Thanks as always in advance.

 

Em

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is unusual for the bank to take it all the way but you should always work on the assumption that it will go to court and make sure you prepare for court. The filling in of dates may well be a scare tactic, but ensure that you are ready should they decide to take it all the way. Cumberland BS is not a company that hasfeatured much on this site and its therefore difficult to gage their tactics. I'm aware of only one other who took legal advice after receiving the counter claim and was advised to abandon her case. So I would imagine they are expecting you to do the same. Its a matter of waiting to see who blinks first.

 

Stick to your guns and keep them on their toes.

 

All the best

 

Zoot

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes true.Yorkshire bank are known to issue counter claims too.

Its not the first time we have seen them giving unavailable dates.....like Zoot says they know you will read into this on the assumption that they are giving thoughts to attending a hearing.

They could also be considering applying for a telephone hearing. using the excuse that its more convenient for them.......seen more frequently in particular with Citi as Zoot is quite aware of.

Whatever the reasons behind this you should,as has been said,be prepared for all eventualities.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks both,

 

I have been making myself familiar with the court bundle and when/if a court date is received I will begin to prepare it, just a shame this is in my partners name as he isn't as confident about all the info like us who are avid readers of this site. Homework lessons due I think!

 

I assume that the the person who decided to take legal advise was advised to drop the case as she was not guaranteed to win, as no one has really been to court yet or because they have no gain in helping?

 

Thanks for the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was some time ago now and there was little knowledge on the site as to how to react to a counterclaim. Solicitors are not generally conversant or used to dealing with bank charge cases and it may well have been too much effort for them to take the case on, so the easiest advice for them to give would be to tell them to drop it. You can see the thread here:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/other-institutions/14020-my-banks-filed-counterclaim.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could act as your partners lay representative if it ever came to court and he agrees to it.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I submitted a MCOL on 21st June and haven't got a date yet, although other things have happened like a stay and huge backlogs at my local court. It won't hurt to phone the court to find out what's going on though.

The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally I have something to report!!

 

Just spoke to the court and they've told me that a date has been set for a hearing, 2nd February. I take it my local courts are as snowed under as the rest! They said my partner should have a letter about it when we get home.

 

Court bundle to start then...

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's official, finally received the letter. Hearing is set for 8th Feb, it said that mine would be heard back to back with other hearings. I assume this is no different from any other, I think i've read somewhere the same.

 

My court bundle has to be in by 12th Dec, doesn't give me much time to prepare it!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

The Cumberland have sent their court bundle today. Its just copies of their terms and conditions, copy letters they sent when a charge had been applied, two refund charge letters when two of the applied charges had been refunded, banking code leaflets etc. Nothing which argues that there charges are not a disproportionate penalty.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bundles handed in today, quite proud of them, especially in comparison to theirs! The only thing i've realised after handing them in is that I've page numbered the courts and my own but I didn't page number the banks. Is that ok?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...