Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Setting aside a judgememt


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4105 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I put in a small claim against a builder which was made up of three separate amounts - two were for definite invoiceable amounts relating to replacement of damaged items and one related to my loss of earnings for a day I took off to sort it all out so could be considered less "cut an dried" (even though it's a fair amount). He received a CCJ by default as he didn't respond or defend the claim but then made a separate application to set the judgement aside within a couple of weeks of it being issued.

 

My questions are -

- Do I have to do anything or will the court contact me so I have the opportunity to put an objection into his application?

- Will I even get to see the grounds on which he has made the application so I can counter it? I would like to be able to submit a payslip, for example, proving my daily charge was fair.

 

I feel that the time for disputing any part of the claim was during 14 day period he was given to respond initially. Everything was done properly from my side so it just looks like a back door way of delaying me enforcing the judgement! :???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there was a judgement it will appear on the ''public information'' section of credit files of 6 years if it's not set aside.

You will be informed by the court of the application.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Brigadier2JCS, what about in the meantime though? I understand it can take a while for a set aside hearing to be scheduled - does the CCJ show up on the credit files in the meantime? Also, will I be able to put a case in against the set aside? I do feel this is important as I am confident I can counter any argument the defendant may try to put forward.

 

Many thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since my last post the defendant has told the court he has changed address to where the claim was sent although I know it was right when it was issued. I have just looked online at requesting a warrant anyway because the time I gave him to pay is up but it says the court issues this to the address on the claim. Is there anything I can now or do I have to just sit tight now until the court officially writes to me about the set aside? Certainly some game playing/delay tactics going on here although not helpful for him and his business if the CCJ is outstanding in the meantime I'd have thought?

Link to post
Share on other sites

" but then made a separate application to set the judgement aside within a couple of weeks of it being issued. "

 

How was this brought to your attention Sarah ....you should have received a copy of their application and evidence in support....if not get a copy now.

 

No point trying to issue enforcement until the matter of set a side is decided.Judging from your last post looks like their application is based on wrong address...you can refute that as last known address is accepted as good service.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...