Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

darren j vs FD *** WON***


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6389 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Great! Keep us posted!

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Right received a letter back dated 18-Oct. Summary as follows:

 

Paragraph 1: Bank charges are in effect legal and we are justified and totally correct in applying them to your a/c, etc, etc

 

Paragraph 2: So much so that we are prepared to offer you a settlement of £145.

 

Basically the letter states that they are unable to refund the remaining two £12 credit card fees as this is 'the revised charging structure following the OFT's ruling.'

 

The offer is a full and final settlement and if I am not happy then I'm to go to the ombusdman.

 

From the step by step instructions it recommends that I should accept the offer, but only as a partial settlement and that I should continue to claim the remaining £24. Should I do this by amending the reply slip they sent me? Or should I state this in an LBA when I seek to claim the remaining £24?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Amend the 1st paragraph of the LBA (but still claim for the whole amount, since you haven't actually got the £145)

 

Thank you for your letter dated xx/xx/xx and settlement offer of £ XXX

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Interesting, so are FD acknowledging by changing thier penakty charges the original charges were not compliant with the pints raised by the OFT?

 

Wriggle and wriggle all you want FD, a pointless exercise as it will cost you in the long run.

I love the smell of banks coughing up refunds early in the morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

And will they be reducing their charges to £12 in future?

 

It's worth pointing out that the OFT did not say that £12 was ok - just that they'd be unlikely to challenge that kind of fee. Doesn't make it lawful.

 

Keep on your timetable and you'll get the whole lot back.

Matt

 

First Direct: £6639.77 settled in full

MBNA Visa:

Co-Op Visa:

Capital One Visa:

M&S Financial Services:

IKANO Financial Services:

 

"All the truly great men are dead - and I'm not feeling too well myself."

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the LBA do I need to repeat the sections which I have already sent in the prelim letter (eg references to how shocked I am, contract law, etc) or will the below suffice?

 

Thank you for your letter dated 18-Oct-06 and settlement offer of £145.

 

I will accept the sum offered only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that I will pursue recovery of the remainder as these fees are unlawful at Common Law, Statute and recent Consumer regulations.

 

I calculate that you have taken £169 in total. I enclose a schedule of the charges which I am claiming with this letter. I have already sent you a copy of this in my original letter of the 16-Oct-06.

 

I require repayment in full of this money. If you do not comply fully within 14 days then I shall begin a claim against you for the full amount plus interest plus my costs and without further notice.

Thank you all for the responses so far.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Received letter from F/D dated 30-Oct-06. In summary they are not able to help as it was their final response and that I'm to go to the Ombudsman if I'm still not happy.

 

MCOL here I come, but just a few quick questions...

 

I never sent any details of the 8% interest and the o/d interest with my schedule of charges. I see now that I have to do this before I can claim. Should I just write a further letter stating that I will now be going to court and attach the full schedule again along with the interest charges?

 

Secondly, with regards to the o/d interest, how accurate do the calculations have to be. For example, I have been overdrawn on this particular a/c for at least 95% of the time so therefore any charge applied to my a/c will (roughly speaking) have accrued o/d interest 95% of the time (as i would have been in credit the other 5% of the time). So do I have to work out exactly to the day how long my a/c was overdrawn (and therefore accruing o/d interest), or can I accrue for the full period. I hope that makes sense and If someone could please advise as I guess I would leave this out of the claim for the sake of £15 or so if you have to be exact (which is what I suspect).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I just write a further letter stating that I will now be going to court and attach the full schedule again along with the interest charges?

No need. See below

 

 

If someone could please advise as I guess I would leave this out of the claim for the sake of £15 or so if you have to be exact (which is what I suspect).

Lots of people don't bother because they find the s/s too complex and often doesn't amount to that much

 

When you file at MCOL send 2 copies of your schedule of charges, clearly marked with your claim no. + a brief covering letter asking for them to be filed with your claim to:

 

The Court Manager,

Money Claim Online

Northampton County Court

21-27 St. Katharine's Street

Northampton

NN1 2LH

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

(Your Name) –v- (Bank)

Claim No: ********

Date Issued: xx/xx/xx

 

Please find enclosed a schedule of penalty charges taken from me by the defendant, along with interest claimed at the annual rate of 8% pursuant to section 69 of the County Court Act. The interest in addition to the amount in charges equates to the total amount of my claim, namely £(AMOUNT).

 

I respectfully request that the enclosed schedule should be attached to the particulars of my claim.

Yours Faithfully

 

When you receive the Notice of Acknowledgement send a copy to the bank’s solicitors.

  • Haha 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks Michael.

 

One quick question before I submit.

 

Does anyone know if the correct address for First Direct is 40 Wakefield Road, Leeds, LS98 1FD? The contact section on the site seems to suggest I should use the HSBC address?!

Link to post
Share on other sites

That address is fine... it's where I've been sending everything and I've read plenty of other posts from people who always use that address with no problem.

___

MBNA VISA - PL sent 23/10

MBNA MCard - PL sent 23/10

FD - PL sent 23/10, offered approx 75% 27/10

Marbles - PL sent 23/10, rejected letter received 27/10

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Androobe.

 

I'm sure it's ok, but want to make sure I get it right so is the below ok for my particulars of claim?

 

I have a contract with First Direct Bank PLC for an account and credit card (a/c number xxxxxx xxxxxxxx and xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), conducted on their standard terms and conditions. I am claiming return of money taken by the Defendant in the way of charges since 07/09/04, totalling £169.00. The Defendant is aware of all details as a list of charges has already been supplied and another copy will be sent. I contend that the charges exceed the Defendant's losses caused by the breaches and are therefore unenforceable as they are contrary to common law. Further, as a disproportionate penalty they are invalid under the Unfair (Contracts) Terms Act 1977 s.4. In the event that the charges are not a penalty then they are unreasonable within the meaning of the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 s.15. I have repeatedly asked the bank to justify their charges but they have declined to do so. I also claim interest under S.69 of the County Courts Act 1984 at rate of 8% a year which totals £9.10 and continues until judgment or settlement at a daily rate of £0.04.

Link to post
Share on other sites

whoohooo, not long now

you'll have the money by Christmas I'm pretty damn sure of it!

 

Expect a letter from Dg in the post shortly....

If you found this post useful, please click on the "scales" icon in the bottom left of my post and say so!

 

The opinions of this post are those of monkey_uk and do not constitute sound legal advice. I am not a lawyer.

--

 

Halifax Unlawful Bank Charges: S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) Sent 28/02/07 - CC Statement's rcv'd 18/04/07 Bank a/c statements rcv'd 19/04/07

 

 

 

First Direct Unlawful Bank Charges: Settled in Full 12/05/06 | £2235.50

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good news! DG have sent me letter offering a full and final settlement of £208.10.

 

It's the ususal letter saying they believe the charges are fair, but due to costs, etc they will refund the charges and costs.

 

A few quick questions.

 

1. What does 'without prejudice' mean?

 

2. They wish me to sign the below:

 

'I accept the sum of £208.10 in full and final settlement of my claim against HSBC. I agree to keep the fact of my claim and HSBC's ex gratia payment strictly confidential'

 

Am I to cross out the confidential bit and then I will still be in a position to claim in the future?

 

3. Finally, once I receive a cheque am I then to write a letter to the court to let them know we have settled?

 

Sorry if the above are obvious questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send your own acceptance letter, alomg the lines of:

 

Date

 

Dear Whoever

 

Ref: Your Offer of Settlement

Account: xxxxxxxx

Sort Code xx-xx-xx

Claim No: XXXXX in XXXX County Court

 

I acknowledge receipt of your letter date xx/xx/xx and your settlement offer of £XXX

 

I accept your offer as full and final settlement for this claim of bank charges

 

I accept this offer without predjudice and I reserve the right to make any further claims should you apply future charges that may be considered unlawful under common law or in violation of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 or Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.

 

I will be willing to withdraw my claim upon receipt of unconditional full settlement of my claim.

 

I am also not prepared to agree to any confidentially clauses you try to impose, unless of course your client wishes to make an offer of due consideration in addition to the amount of £xxxxx, in order to be afforded this privilege by myself.

 

I trust that you will find this arrangement acceptable.

 

Yours Sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Good news. Letter received dated 12-Dec-06 to confirm the funds will be credited to my a/c in the next 7 days.

 

They thank me for returning the signed settlement letter (which I didn't as I used the draft from above) and that they would like me to sign a slip confirming that the agreed settlement funds have been received and that the CC claim has been concluded. The letter still has without prejudice at the top, but I presume this is not a problem?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...