Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hello I hope someone can give me some advice here, as I am at a bit of a loss on how to proceed. This relates to alleged offences under the RTA. Yesterday I received a notification from the local police of intention to prosecute for the following offences: 1 driving without due care and attention 2 failing to stop at a road traffic accident 3 failing to report a road traffic accident At this stage they have only asked me to say whether I was the driver at the time or not and provided a blank sheet of paper to give information about the incident. Going by the location (just round the corner from where I live) I can only imagine this relating to one recent incident, which wasn't actually an accident but more of a road rage event. I was driving past someone unloading or working next to his lorry which had stopped in the road. I wasn't going fast or anything, while I went by lorry man turned around and punched and kicked my car whilst going past him. I stopped and got out and wanted to know what he thought he was doing punching and kicking my car. He then hurled some verbal abuse at me, swearing and he was quite aggressive. I still didn't know what his problem was and said I would report him to his company for threatening behaviour and vandalism for punching my car. I got my phone and tried to take a photo of his lorry and number plate but at that moment he came right at me, still shouting and swearing, so I was worried he may hit me next, as he already punched my car. I thought if the guy hits me I will come off second best, so I decided to retreat. I quickly got back into my car and left. When I checked my phone later the photo I tried to take was blurred and useless, so I thought it was pointless to report the incident to the police, as the guy would not be traceable. Over that I forgot about it until I got the letter yesterday in the post. This is the only thing I believe this can relate to, but I have no idea based on what the three above allegations come from There was no road traffic accident, more of a road rage incident. So I am at a loss what to do. I have 28 days to respond. Should I just say yes I was the driver and was there and see what happens next, or should I already make a written statement on the attached piece of paper they sent me and send that with it ? Is there anyone here who would have a rough idea what to do next ? I tried my legal advice line through my Union, but they have sent me from pillar to post, now say it needs to go to a different department again and that would be chargeable as the RTA comes under Criminal Law. So any advice would be appreciated Many Thanks
    • So a quick update got bounced around two different departments and managed to speak to a DVLA bod , explained the situation and they could see the overlap and that DD payments had been made from Feb , also no formal remiders prior , they gave me a number for the legal dept who I am calling this morning to see what they can do in terms of the SJP notice , still have time to submit this online.  Will update after my chat this morning 
    • filed the defence at same time as suggested @dx100uk
    • Also, I am trying to understand how invoicing a large sum in a 6m period becomes tax fraud?   Is it because if he had invoiced over the £85k threshold he should have been obligated to charge vat?  Which would have meant hmrc would have benefited from the vat amount? So by not charging it Hmrc have lost out on £s revenue?  Is that what makes it tax fraud? So as a self-employed contractor, let's say he invoiced one Co for 200k.  Should he have charged vat on the full 200k (£40k)? Or just on the sum above the threshold (£23k)?  And that by not charging vat, he has knowingly withheld tax £s from Hmrc? And is the payer complicit ?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Debt and DCA Help Please


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4141 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I really would like some advice on the following situation.

 

I ran up some credit card debt back in 2007. I moved abroad and returned to the UK in 2011.

 

I have just been contacted via letter by a well known DCA saying that I need to pay this debt (around 10k). This is the first time that I have been contacted by anyone regarding this debt. Not sure how they found me but am guessing electoral roll DVLA etc. (Not that it really matters)

 

From what I can tell, the debt will become statute barred in June 2013 according to my credit file.

 

My questions are:

 

1. I will be moving home again in the next few weeks. Do I just ignore these letters and hope they do not find me?

2. I noticed an entry on my credit report for the DCA but the amount is not the same as the amounts that are reported on my credit report for the original debt. That is also listed but the amounts are slightly different. Are they trying to add a fictitious debt to extend the statute barred time? Should an entry from the DCA also appear along with the original debt?

3. What would happen if they continued to send letters but I had moved. Would they pursue it further?

4. If I ignored them, could they issue a CCJ and if so, what If I had moved home and not received any further letters from them or from the court?

 

I have never spoken to them on the phone or acknowledged the debt in any shape or form.

 

I am new to all this so any advice you can share would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

The default could have been lodged some months after the last payment and the SB clock starts from the date of your last payment (or written acknowledgement of the debt).

 

It could be that this is already SB if your last payment was in, say, January 2007.

 

Have you got any records going back that far that you might be able to check from your end?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do not have access to the bank account that I originally used or know of any documentation to verify any exact dates.

 

What I do have is a copy of a letter I wrote to the credit card company in November 2006 saying that I could no longer keep up payments and asking if they would accept a reduced amount to clear the debt.

 

I did not hear anything back from this letter, although I did receive a dodgy phone call by someone who was pretending to be a prospective customer and asking my name and where I was living. They were obviously from a DCA. I was then living in Spain so I guess they thought there would be not point in chasing the debt.

 

So November 2006 was the last time I wrote to the credit card company NOT DCA at this point. Unfortunately at this moment in time I do not have any exact dates to provide.

 

I have checked my credit file again and it says the 1st default was in June 2007.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So it could well be that no further payment has been made on this account since that date in 2006 when you wrote to the card company. Would that sound right to you?

 

If that is the case then this is SB already.

 

If the DCAs name appears on your credit file then it is highly likely that they have bought the debt from the original creditor. Some DCAs specialise in trying to collect SB accounts.

 

Which DCA is it and who was the original creditor?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again.

 

Like I say, my file says that the last payment I made was May 2007 and that on June 2007 I missed a payment. July is marked as the first Default.

 

The original creditor was Egg and the DCA is Lowells.

 

The first letter I received from Lowells said that they had brought the debt off of another company in December 2012, if that helps.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you tell me that If I send a CCA request whether or not this is seen as acknowledging the debt?

 

The debt will become SB in around 4 months time So I obviously want to avoid any form of acknowledgement.

 

Also, what happens if Lowells send a Statutory Demand. Would I need to send the CCA immediately and then get the Statutory Demand set aside? Would this mean that the debt was in dispute?

 

From what I understand, Lowelives are not very good at producing CCA's?

 

If they do produce the CCA and it is bona fide, what would be the next best course of action for me?

 

Thanks for any help you can provide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my file says that the last payment I made was May 2007

 

If that is the case then you are SB in May this year (unless you are in Scotland).

 

A CCA request is not an acknowledgement of the debt but at the moment I see no reason to pull Lowell's chain.

 

If you want chapter and verse on on the account then a SAR to Egg would be the way to go. It may well be that it is littered with charges which could be reclaimed and consequently alter the amount outstanding.

 

If Lowell issued a Statutory Demand then you can apply for it to be set aside. That is why I would SAR Egg to see what the charges situation might be. Also if an SD is issued then you can always do a CCA request then.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you had charges for being late with a payment etc. then they can be reclaimed together with any interest that was charged as a result.

 

If that is the case then the balance owed will be less than is being claimed.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ims21,

 

Sorry, one more question.

 

I have a new entry on my credit file for Lowell.

 

As I have not acknowledged them in any way at this time, is that not illegal? Should they not inform you before they place an entry on your file? Plus it says I am in default to them from this month!!

 

Also, why is there a separate one for them and also for the original creditor?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, it's a new entry for Lowell and a default for Jan 2013. The amount is slightly different to the original debt which shows on my file for the original creditor.

 

So to clarify, there is the existing entry which shows the defaults etc for each month and a new one recently added for Lowell with the big "D" for default. Can that be right??

 

It is for the same debt though as the account numbers are the same. Are they just trying it on and trying to extend the SB date?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...that is not right.

 

There are many threads on here where Lowell seem to think they can get away with stuff like this.

 

I have plucked this thread from a quick search of the site and you can use the letter in post #4 as a template to write to them to get them to behave.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?377198-2-Defaults-for-the-same-debt&p=4118488&highlight=two+defaults#post4118488

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...