Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

'Shock' at cyclists' crash deaths


NewsBot
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4069 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

yes indeed, shocking. Apparently the driver is disqualified so also not insured. He has been charged with 2 counts of causing death by dangerous driving which carries a max penalty of 14 years (so in theory could get 28 years). As far as i'm concerned, due to his blatant disregard for the law, he should get the max penalty. What's the odds on him getting no where near that?

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police chased him and caused the crash. Unless they had a good reason to do so the blame lies with them.

 

It must of been an awful experience for you to have witnessed it.

 

Fact of the matter is that the driver should not have been there at all as he was not legally entitled to be behind the wheel. It's highly likely that had he been legal, the police would not of been chasing him. As for who was actually to blame for the actual crash, I can't comment because I wasn't there but obviously you must have been to make such a definitive statement.

 

Please Note

 

The advice I offer will be based on the information given by the person needing it. All my advice is based on my experiences and knowledge gained in working in the motor and passenger transport industries in various capacities. Although my advice will always be sincere, it should be used as guidence only.

 

I would always urge to seek face to face professional advice for clarification prior to taking any action.

 

Please click my reputation 'star' button at the bottom of my profile window on the left if you found my advice useful.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The police chased him and caused the crash. Unless they had a good reason to do so the blame lies with them.

 

What a pathetic post.

 

The fault is entirely with the person who hit them - to excuse him by blaming the police in such an uninformed way is disgusting.

 

I just feel sorry for the two unfortunate cyclists and their families.

 

Unlike you I have no sympathy for the driver that killed them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any uninsured driver, or driver without a licence that knocks someone down, seriously injures or kills them, should have PERMANENT revocation of their ability to hold a licence, AND spent a considerable time in prison WITHOUT possibility of parole. The laws regarding this kind of thing are way too lax. We need to take a leaf from the USA, where in the vast majority of states it is considered assault with a deadly weapon, and killing someone with a car is considered murder. Both crimes punishable by a serious amount of time in prison, the latter almost always having a lifetime sentence.

 

Only then will the idiots out there take any notice.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

not re cyclists, but recently man city youth player admitted causing death x2 by careless driving (speeding (double the limit) and messing around). only 16 months inside, likely to be out in 8 months!

another recent case, woman texting whilst driving, goes off road, kills an oap pedestrian, 18 months!

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Money talks ford :(

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

i know. dirty cash an all that..

walking down my street, every 5 or so car drivers on the phone!! street was targeted by police not so long ago, and they nicked quite a few, but hasn't made any difference since. i'm going vigilante, to be seen on you tube :)

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

Any uninsured driver, or driver without a licence that knocks someone down, seriously injures or kills them, should have PERMANENT revocation of their ability to hold a licence, AND spent a considerable time in prison WITHOUT possibility of parole. The laws regarding this kind of thing are way too lax. We need to take a leaf from the USA, where in the vast majority of states it is considered assault with a deadly weapon, and killing someone with a car is considered murder. Both crimes punishable by a serious amount of time in prison, the latter almost always having a lifetime sentence.

 

Only then will the idiots out there take any notice.

 

Not sure killing someone is akin to murder but sentencing should be equivalent to manslaughter unless the intent is proven. I can't understand why sentencing seems to be so low.

 

Many magistrates issue sentences / fines for being uninsured that are so low they are effectively condoning having no insurance.

 

That's what we get for having too many in the legal profession who see criminals as victims and true victims as only out for revenge.

Link to post
Share on other sites

not re cyclists, but recently man city youth player admitted causing death x2 by careless driving (speeding (double the limit) and messing around). only 16 months inside, likely to be out in 8 months!

another recent case, woman texting whilst driving, goes off road, kills an oap pedestrian, 18 months!

 

Crazy - the sentencing judges should be ashamed of themselves

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure killing someone is akin to murder but sentencing should be equivalent to manslaughter unless the intent is proven. I can't understand why sentencing seems to be so low.

 

Many magistrates issue sentences / fines for being uninsured that are so low they are effectively condoning having no insurance.

 

That's what we get for having too many in the legal profession who see criminals as victims and true victims as only out for revenge.

 

If you drive in an unsafe and dangerous manner and then kill someone, it should be treated as murder. The fact that you delibrately drove like that knowing you could do some serious harm should be intent enough.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Crazy - the sentencing judges should be ashamed of themselves

 

there was no doubt a 'plea bargain' involved, ie admit to death by careless rather than prosecution for dangerous.

unfortunately, J's sentencing is guided by their statutory guidelines which they can't really detract from, otherwise there would be an appeal.

and, as rene says, certain economics rule. not enough prison space, not enough cash to build and staff new prisons, policy reasons, etc etc.

imagine if the min sentence for death by careless/dangerous driving was the same for murder or at least discretionary re manslaughter. would think people would be more careful, or would they? there is not much deterrent anymore re certain sentences. can commit murder and be out in around 10, or less!

Edited by Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...