Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I found that the parkin attended has a car with CCTV camera on it, however as I stated earlier, it seems that he did not take video of my car otherwise they would have stated so in the SAR. parking car .pdf
    • The rules state that "approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances"  I was not a threat. I was not present. I did not drive away. I think he has not fulfilled the necessary requirements justifying issuing me a PCN by post therefore the PCN was issued incorrectly and not valid.  What are your thoughts?  
    • I have also found this:  D.2 Service of a PCN by post: 54) There are some circumstances in which a PCN (under Regulation 10) may be served by post: 1) where the contravention has been detected on the basis of evidence from an approved device (approved devices may only be used in limited circumstances) 2) if the CEO has been prevented, for example by force, threats of force, obstruction or violence, from serving the PCN either by affixing it to the vehicle or by giving it to the person who appears to be in charge of that vehicle 3) if the CEO had started to issue the PCN but did not have enough time to finish or serve it before the vehicle was driven away and would otherwise have to write off or cancel the PCN 55) In any of these circumstances a PCN is served by post to the owner and also acts as the NtO. The Secretary of State recommends that postal PCNs should be sent within 14 days of the contravention. Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations. This from London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The question is what is an approved device? Certainly, he had the opportunity to place the ticket on my car and I didn't drive away.  I looked further and it seems that an approved device is a CCTV camera - It seems that the photos taken were not actual film but images and it is not clear if they are taken from a video or are stills. I'm guessing if it was moving images then the SAR would have stated this.    From the Borough of Hounslow website: "There are two types of PCN issued under the Traffic Management Act 2004, which governs parking contraventions. The first is served on-street by a Civil Enforcement Officer, who will observe a vehicle and collect evidence before serving the PCN either by placing it in a plastic wallet under the windscreen wiper, or by handing it to the driver. The second is a PCN served by post, based on CCTV footage taken by an approved device, which has been reviewed by a trained CCTV Operator."   From Legislation.gov.uk regarding approved devices: Approved Devices 4.  A device is an approved device for the purposes of these Regulations if it is of a type which has been certified by the Secretary of State as one which meets requirements specified in Schedule 1. SCHEDULE 1Specified requirements for approved devices 1.  The device must include a camera which is— (a)securely mounted on a vehicle, a building, a post or other structure, (b)mounted in such a position that vehicles in relation to which relevant road traffic contraventions are being committed can be surveyed by it, (c)connected by secure data links to a recording system, and (d)capable of producing in one or more pictures, a legible image or images of the vehicle in relation to which a relevant road traffic contravention was committed which show its registration mark and enough of its location to show the circumstances of the contravention. 2.  The device must include a recording system in which— (a)recordings are made automatically of the output from the camera or cameras surveying the vehicle and the place where a contravention is occurring, (b)there is used a secure and reliable recording method that records at a minimum rate of 5 frames per second, (c)each frame of all captured images is timed (in hours, minutes and seconds), dated and sequentially numbered automatically by means of a visual counter, and (d)where the device does not occupy a fixed location, it records the location from which it is being operated. 3.  The device and visual counter must— (a)be synchronised with a suitably independent national standard clock; and (b)be accurate within plus or minus 10 seconds over a 14-day period and re-synchronised to the suitably independent national standard clock at least once during that period. 4.  Where the device includes a facility to print a still image, that image when printed must be endorsed with the time and date when the frame was captured and its unique number. 5.  Where the device can record spoken words or other audio data simultaneously with visual images, the device must include a means of verifying that, in any recording produced by it, the sound track is correctly synchronised with the visual image.
    • Hearing took place today.  Case dismissed with costs awarded. Neither UKPC or a representative turned up.  Apparently they messaged the court on 7 May asking for their case to be considered on paper.  Never informed me, which was criticised by the judge as not following procedure.  I was really annoyed as I would have preferred for the case to be thrown out before the hearing, or at least face them in court and see them squeal.   They are just playing a numbers game and hope you blink 1st!   Ended up having to change my flight, but  the costs awarded softens the blow. Was asked to confirm it was my signature on both the witness statement and supplementary statement.  Wasn't asked to read them, said she could see my arguments made and the signs were insufficient and no contract formed. Took maybe 10 mins in total.  Judge did most of the talking and was best for me just to keep quiet or confirm any statements made. Happy to have won as a matter of principle and have costs awarded. Maybe not worth all the time and hassle for any newbies or the technologically challenged.  But if you are stubborn like me and willing to put in the time and effort, you can beat these vultures! I big shout out to everyone who helped on the thread with their advice and guidance, special mention to FTMDave, thank you sir!  Really appreciate everyone's efforts. All the best!
    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Bristow & Sutor - Advise please


sbchamb
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6425 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

 

I've had real difficulty with a collection company called Bristow & Sutor due to council tax arrears and I am planning on taking them on to recover what I feel are excessive and disproportionate charges. I paid over £500 to them last month half of which was for 'charges'.

 

I won't bother you with all the details because it is quite a long story but I would really welcome any advise from people who have crossed swords with Bristow and Sutor before. My main grievances are:

 

  • They have never shown me any breakdown of charges. Amounts always seem to vary and they give no explanation.
  • They levied against a vehicle that is on a HP agreement and therefore technically I do not own (I believe this is something they can't do and they were told about the vehicle being on HP)
  • They have charged me for attending to collect the vehicle when they didn't even come to my property, they just threatend my wife over the phone.

Any help would be very welcome.

 

Thanks

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear Sir/Madam,

Re: Your Reference

 

I understand XXX Council has appointed you to recover my Council Tax Liability arrears for 200x. which are £xxxx Council Tax Liability.

 

Firstly I would like to make you aware that I am aware of my rights and you will not gain entry to my home under any circumstances to levy goods and the fees allowed under statue and when which fees can be applied.

 

Due to my circumstances I am unable to pay this in one payment. I advocate a payment schedule of 24 months with 23 months payments at £xx.xx and the balance of £xx.xx to be paid on the 24th month to cover the principle. I understand this may seem a long time but this is a realistic offer that is affordable to me and will allow me to pay future bills issued for Council Tax without them falling into arrears. A greater amount would cause me real and factual hardship.

 

I am able to pay the above amount on the xx of each month, as an act of good faith I have enclosed the first payment chq number xxxxxx. Please advise how you would like future payments made. My personal preference is payment by Standing Order.

 

It should be noted that I am not at any point refusing to pay this debt but only asking for a fair payment period considering my circumstances. And if you are unable to accept my offer I will place the money aside each month until such a time the council take the account back into their management, when I will make payment of the set aside money to the council.

 

Please forward a statement of account to myself within 7 working days. Please ensure that the statement is itemised ands shows clearly payments made by me and the charges applied by yourself.

 

I am sending the council a copy of this letter and requesting that it be filed with my account for further reference.

 

I hope the above meets your approval and I look forward to your timely reply by letter.

 

Yours faithfully,

__________________

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for this reply Lesser but I should have pointed out that I have now fully paid the amount owing. My bugbear is the excessive charges I have had to pay (mostly without my knowledge) and I would like to take action to try and recover them. The problem is I don't really know how to and I'd like to know how other people have tackled this problem.

 

Thanks again,

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No they have never gained entry to the property and have not levy against any possessions but whilst I was at work one day they did list my wife's vehicle because it was sitting on the driveway and they wouldn't go away. This vehicle is on a 4 year HP agreement which we are half way through.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have never shown me any breakdown of charges. Amounts always seem to vary and they give no explanation.
1) we will get you these though the council as they will never send them.

 

They levied against a vehicle that is on a HP agreement and therefore technically I do not own (I believe this is something they can't do and they were told about the vehicle being on HP)
2) That is a levy, we may be able to argue it but if it went to a tax hearing a judge would ask if you showed them paper work and if answer is no he will count it as a levy.

They have charged me for attending to collect the vehicle when they didn't even come to my property.

3) You will need to prove this, how did you pay.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Dear My Council,

 

I am writing in regard to the recent account I had with your bailiff.

 

I have asked the bailiff company for an itemised statement of the account and so far this has failed to be sent.

 

I am now asking that you instruct your bailiffs to send the information I am entailed to under statue. I require a statement of account within 7 working days. Please ensure that the statement is itemised and shows clearly payments made by me and the charges with desperation applied by your bailiff.

 

I require this information as I believe that I have not been charged in line with the fees set down in statue, may I remind you that you have a duty of care to me and as the the employer of the bailiffs you have a responsibility that the bailiff are acting under the guidelines set down in law.

 

If I fail to get the stamtements I will issue a subject access request to both the bailiff firm and the council under the Data Protection Act and I will also make a formal complaint to the council over failure of the duty of care.

 

I should also warn you that if the charges applied to my account are greater then that set down in statue I will be making a formal complaint to the council over your failure to police the agents you employ and as such the failure to the local people of your duty of care to them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Zooman, thanks for the advise. The sequence of events was this:

 

  • After making a seies of payments to them we stopped paying because we belived we had paid the debt but they visited us for full payment or removal of goods. My wife refused to let them in so the bailiff agreed to allow my wife to pay an installment only if she took the details of the car. My wife agreed to this and paid an installment. Despite requests they never sent a breakdown of the payments or the charges.
  • We paid another couple of installments in the months following before stopping the payments because they had not sent any proof that we still owed them anything. So they visited us again in a van stating they had come for full payment or the vehicle. I emphasise a van because the car is a 4X4 and they could not recover a vehicle using a transit van. My wife had to pay an installment to get rid of them.
  • Again despite requests no statement or breakdown was sent and so we made no more payments. They then phoned our house and my wife answered and they said they were on their way round to collect the vehicle unless we paid a final installment of £230.00. My wife gave them my debit card number and they took £504 out of my account. The additional amount of £274.00 was for their 'charges'. They did not tell my wife this was going to be taken they only stated £230. I only found out when I checked my balance a few days later.
  • We phoned them and complained and they said they were entitled to charge taht amount because they had the recovery vehicle and the men to take our 4X4 but they didn't even attend the house. We got no paperwork, receipt, statement, nothing. They basically fobbed us off.
  • We complained to the council and the also washed their hands of it and referred us back to the bailiffs. I have now received a compliant form but I don't have any faith it will do any good. Have I got grounds to take legal action?

I hope I've given you enough background on the case without waffling too much and I really appreciate any help you can offer.

 

Sorry I meant to add that I do habve the necessary HP documents for the courts to view if necessary.

 

Thanks

Stuart.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one at my office that I could use. Should I fax them and demand the satement or write a recorded delivery letter so I have proof of asking?

 

By the way Bristow and Sutor are used by Warwick District Council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...