Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles.
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Getting Started with my debts


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3496 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have various debts that are being handled by agencies.

 

I have a limited company that I stupidly set up a bank account for with Natwest.

I say stupidly because they held my personal account too.

 

I had an instance of fraud on my company website and had to refund a customer £160.

This came at a precarious time in terms of cash flow.

 

As a result the account was thrown into debt.

 

Natwest decided to close both my personal and my business accounts at the same time because of it.

 

I also owe worldpay who were my gateway service providers for my website.

 

I have a personal debt with Very due to defaulting on the buy now pay later scheme as I found myself unemployed.

 

As it stands I have had many letters from many CCA's.

 

It appears that the debt is being moved around a lot.

Natwest and Worldpay are both being held by Moorcroft.

Very is with NDR.

 

I did get a call this morning from someone saying they are "Allied International" and then asking me to supply details for data protection.

 

As I had no idea who they were I refused to give them any information.

 

The woman said she couldn't tell me anything without my information.

 

In the end she hung up.

I understand now that they are AIC.

I'm not sure which debt they now hold.

 

I would really like advice on how to get started with sorting this whole mess out.

 

Thanks in advance for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi AA

 

welcome aboard.

 

firstly

 

it might well be an idea to get your CRA file

 

see below noddle is free

 

that will tell you what sebts you have and who owns them.

 

just remember that you are under NO legal obl to discuss your debts on the phone

 

and

 

99% of the time - a DCA is toothless and can do NOWT bar threaten.

 

they are NOT bailiffs and have no such legal powers.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi DX thanks for your reply.

I'm going to have to wait for that at the moment.

The natwest account was my only account so I don't have a card to ID with yet.

I've put in an application to open another account so hopefully I can do that in the next week.

(I was working abroad for a year and so used an account there instead).

 

Would you suggest that I just wait till I can get my CRA file?

These debts have been hanging over me since 2011 and I am due to start a new job in December so I want to make a fresh start.

 

Is there anything I can be doing in the meantime?

What should I look out for when I get my CRA file?

How long can I leave the CA's hanging before they take things further?

 

Sorry for all the questions, all this is like another language to me!

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to make sure ALL your debts show on your CRA file

 

and whom owns the debt now.

 

it wont hurt to list your debts now though

 

might be candidates for reclaiming too.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I have the full information now.

 

I have a 756.32 debt with Shop Direct (Very) held by capQuest. A lot of it will be charges.

 

I have 2045.22 with Natwest held by AIC

 

I have 164.31 with Worldpay held by Moorcroft.

 

What would you reccomend I do to start? I had agreements to pay 5 off each month with the previous holder of the Natwest debt. Apart from that there isn't anything else I'm doing. I just want to feel like I'm making some headway into resolving this.

 

Thanks in advance for all the help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you do as dx100uk suggested and get credit reports ? If so what shows and what is the status of each debt?

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got letters from Very's Arrears Collection Department telling me the account is in Arrears.

Then I got a letter from them in December 2011 titled "notice of default sums under the consumer credit act 1974".

This stated that they had charged me 24.00.

 

From Natwest I have a letter dayed 06/07/2011 giving me 28 days notice to pay before they give information about my indebtedness to CRA's.

On the next pahe it says notice served under sections 76(1) and 98(1) of the consumer credit act 1974.

 

Are these the default notices?

 

Thanks so much for all your help I literally have no clue as what to do!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes and the very account has an unreasonble charge of £24 on it, but that's for later.

CCA request to very to see if they have the agreement. £1 statutory fee payable they have 12 + 2 days to comply, use the template from the CAG library.

Send it to the Compliance Manager at Capquest.

 

What type of account is the NatWest one.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok thanks. I'll send that off tomorrow. The Natwest account was a graduate account.

 

I'll have to look for the default notice from Worldpay but I think they sent one. That is under the name of my limited company though. Is the process the same in terms of the CCA request?

 

Hi Brigadier

 

I've sent off my CCA request to CapQuest. I'll let you know what they say. What do you recommend for Natwest and WorldPay?

 

Thanks again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi All

 

I'm resurrecting my old thread because this is still ongoing. Fortunately I am now in a position to pay everything off.

 

According to the letters I owe Capquest £756 and I owe Natwest £2,044. I've not heard from Natwest for a long time but a DCA contacted me last week about the Capquest charges. They are on my credit file as in default.

 

Whats the best course of action to take to minimise the long term effects on my credit file or is it too late?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you answer dx 100s questions in his last post please?

 

Are you planning to make offers in full and final payment on these debts.

 

If so any offer letter must be carefully worded and made on the understanding YOUR conditions are to be met before any payment is made.

 

It is likely (although you can try to make this a condition of the offer) that the entries will be completely removed from the files so the entry will be marked "settled" "partially settled " or satisfied. Settled is the best option, the entry however will remain for 6 years from the default date.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the fast reply. I never requested my SAR but I will do tonight. Should I do so for both debts? I have all my statements for the Capquest debt so I can go through it and look for charges myself.

 

ETA: I would be willing to make a full and final settlement on both accounts (minus any charges).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Are you saying at this stage no matter what I do,

until i get to the end of the 6 yearslink3.gif I'm stuffed in terms of the damage done to my credit rating

and the view any lenders will give me in the future?

 

until the defaults reach 6yrs

and the whole account goes

 

you are stuffed yes,

 

wont matter if you pay it

full or part by F&F

you are stuffed.

 

All references to a defaulted debt must be removed from your credit files after 6 years

has passed from date of default, whether paid off or not.

.

the WHOLE ACCOUNT WILL VANISH, never to return.

.

however, this does not mean the debt itself is not still owed

consider a CCA request.

.

This is so that someone who continues paying something

- even after 6 years from default

- should not be at a disadvantage to someone who pays nothing after default

and ends up with a clean file after 6 years.

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I have started a new thread as you suggested.

 

if I'm understanding correctly if I have the money now I may as well pay it off

 

that after the 6 years its done and dusted and they won't be contacting me anymore.

 

I'll have to pay it off at some stage so if I can afford to do it now I should,

but negotiate the lowest possible price.

Would that be a fair assessment?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you pay it off now yes they wil lleave you alone. But the damage is done to your credit file anyway.

 

INSTEAD

 

Put the money aside and reserve it for IF they take court action.

 

After 6 years as long as you do not acknowledge or pay anything it gets wiped and they cannot enforce in court. (5 in scotland)

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

The SabreSheep, All information is offered on good faith and based on mine and others experiences. I am not a qualified legal professional and you should always seek legal advice if you are unsure of your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suppose I'm thinking that it's better to pay a reduced fee now than have to pay the full thing later on.

 

Although the ideal is paying zero at the end of the 6 years.

 

is there no truth to what I've read that other potential lenders like to see that I have taken responsibility for my debt?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes I did sign a personal guarantee. I have the option to wind down the business in which case they say they can't pursue the debt.

 

 

As it is the bulk of the debt is from the personal account anyway.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...