Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Black Horse - can I still claim...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3992 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

Quick question regarding PPI.

I used to have car finance with Black Horse [paid off in May 2010]…well actually it was a Personal Loan but they linked a car I brought to the HPI register and mistreated the agreement as hire purchase but that’s another story.

Basically the usual story, Carland where the car was purchased told me it would improve my chances of getting a loan if I took out the PPI – I said no I didn’t want it and a couple of years into paying the loan I discovered part of the payment was PPI which was lumped into the loan and the interest was added to this too. - this helped make a £4500 loan cost 10k to pay back!

I called Black Horse and asked for a refund then – this was well before the recent PPI claims being in the news I just knew I was in the right.

 

Black Horse said they would stop the PPI from then and recalculate my monthly payments – about 10 months passed and they still hadn’t so I complained again and said I wanted it stopping and a refund for all of it – they noted I had called previously so they would reduce my payments by the £24 odd that was PPI and sent me a cheque for around £500 for the PPI I’d paid in since I first complained.

They refused to give me a refund or the interest back on the payments made prior to me contacting them.

My simple question is can I now reclaim this – I formally disputed this at the time and I never accepted that I’d agreed to PPI payments – it was miss-sold from the off.

If I'm ‘allowed’ to reclaim after accepting a previous refund [albeit only what they’d continued to take after they’d allegedly stopped my PPI].

If so I’ll get a SAR off to Black Horse and fill in the relevant paperwork.

 

 

 

 

Dates and figures are approx. but I think I still have digital copies of letters I sent to them so I can probably firm up and lose details if they are deemed relevant and this stage.

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I would do is work out the amount you should have got back by using this spreadsheet with the "Claim To" date set to the date that you got the previous refund. That will tell you whether the amount they gave you is close to the amount you should have received.

 

If it isn't then contact them and tell them that they have not refunded the correct amount and you require the balance to be paid to you.

 

From what you say it seems that they had pretty much agreed that this was mis-sold.

 

 

StatIntSheet v101.xls

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks,

 

I'll send a SAR to Black Horse and see what I can fill in to the form.

 

I know they only paid me back the 10 or so months worth of PPI that I paid after asking them to cancel it...the first 2 years or so were never returned and the APR was something like 22% so it obviously adds up, especially as Black Horse pre-load their interest at the beginning.

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Well Black Horse are efficient – they received my SAR on Nov 5th and I already have the info!

So I’ve had a look through and I took out the loan on the 2nd Feb 2005.

On the 10th October 2006 I noticed when I was having a finical spring clean that there was PPI on the account which I didn’t recall asking for in fact I’m sure I made a point of saying no.

I wrote to Black Horse and said I wanted to cancel it, as I believed it was miss sold. Then they replied and said my monthly payments would be reduced from £150,68 to £135.99 once they received a copy of the signed cancelation form which I duly returned – then I forgot about it assume all was done and dusted.

In November 2008 I noticed that these payments had not reduced and so called Black Horse and asked why – they claimed never to have received my cancelation form and sent another one – I argued that I wanted a refund of the overpayment and the interest [as black horse front-load it], they said they’d sent me the 2 years of over payments to my bank and recalculate the interest and knock it off my loan which would result in the reduced monthly payments. [of 132.64 so slightly less than quoted 2 years earlier]

Eventually this all happened but the fact remains that for the first 20months of this loan I was paying PPI without realising and I’d like it back.

I’d disputed this long before the government stepped in so what I’m asking is, am I likely to be able to claim this back?

To my reckoning there is 20 payments a-miss somewhere from the start of the policy.

I have the agreement, which says the PPI was £1065.53, which was added to my loan [APR was 19.9] with a total payable over 60 months of £1569 for the PPI [if it had run to completion].

I’ve had a look at the PPI calculator and I can see its straight forward, but whats not straight forward is if the PPI had a knock on affect on the total interest I’ve paid on that loan as it was lumped in with the main loan and not an interest free separate insurance?

 

I think I'm confusing myself :S

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had two loans in the past with Black Horse (Finance as they were back then).

 

One day I received a letter advising they were not upholding my complaint because they had not received the paperwork they requested from me, by a date I can't remember. However, that letter pre-dated the phonecall I had with them which is when they requested the paperwork i.e. the woman had already drafted and posted that letter before she's spoken to me! Anyway, when I emailed their CEO with this information, he was good enough to respond and acknowledge they'd screwed up.

 

I received a phonecall from someone else going over the details of my claim and what I had confirmed in the paperwork. I was told they would be in touch in writing with their decision.

 

A couple of days later, I received a letter from the same woman who had written to me previously to tell me my complaint wasn't being upheld, to advise that although my claim pre-dated regulation (which meant my complaint fell outside of the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service), Black Horse had reviewed my complaint again, were upholding it and would issue a cheque totalling £4,147.54 to cover payments I'd made plus any interest that had accrued on the amount. The cheque arrived about three weeks later.

 

It's hard, but keep going. There is light at the end of the tunnel.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It definitely is worth it. Don't let them confuse you and if you send anything by post, send it via first class recorded delivery. Stick to the facts and keep any emotion out of your communication with them.

 

It sounds stupid, but there have been so many times I have had to take a step back from what I am doing. In some cases, where they've really wound me up, I do nothing for a couple of days then go back to it.

 

Best of luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

OK, I’ve finally gotten around to dealing with this!

 

I have reviewed the information I received from my SAR and ‘think’ this is right:

 

I took out a loan for £5049.00 and PPI was included at an additional cost of £1068.53

 

Both were lumped together to make a total figure and were subjected to 19.9% APR.

 

I think I’m right in saying £1068.53 is 17.41% of the total loan value £61173.53 so every month 17.1% of my payment was the PPI and its associated interest?

 

I paid 150.68 per month which means £26.23 was allocated to the PPI?

 

So using the calculator and the exact dates my payments were paid for the 2 years prior to me cancelling it I’m owed a refund with interest of £951.88.

 

Is there anything I’ve missed?

 

I’ve filled in the claim form on Black Horses website however I need to put a reason that this insurance was ‘miss-sold’.

 

Looking through my SAR originally when I cancelled I’d said it was miss sold as I didn’t think I’d agreed to it and they just sent me back a copy of my signed agreement for it – but having now racked my brain I recall the salesman telling me I’d have a much better chance of having my loan approved if I opted for the insurance…

 

I’m not sure who to word this part of the claim?

 

Sorry for all the questions – I’m normally good with these things!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well further to my last post Black Horse have already responded and refused my claim.

 

I stated the following reasons for my claim:

 

 

  • The policy was not fully explained to me.

 

  • The total cost of adding PPI to my loan was not clearly explained to me, i.e. there was no option to pay for the policy upfront, it was added to my total loan value.
  • It was alluded to me that it would be extremely difficult to be excepted for a loan should I not take out PPI with my loan.
  • Despite attempting to pressure me into taking out the cover, I thought I had declined it; yet in 2006 when looking through the contract, I discover I had been paying towards PPI. I cancelled it accordingly [although as I had declined it was not explained to me that I could cancel the policy].
  • The loan contract says below the ‘details of supplier’ to refer to clause 7 for the Terms and Conditions of the PPI – Clause 7 refers to ‘Early Settlement’ of the Loan and makes no reference to PPI.
  • Clause 6 states that the PPI cover is only taken out if the ‘yes box’ in the payment protection plan section is ticked – there is not box to tick, let alone one with a tick in it.

This was their response:

 

Thank you for your recent letter regarding the sale of PPI in relation to the above account.

 

It is important that we are made aware if any instances where our customers feel that insurance has been miss-sold, however, our records show that we did not sell the PPI for this agreement. The insurance was sold by Carland (ref CA) at the point of sale.

 

Unfortunately, Carland is no longer trading so we are unable to refer this matter to them for a response but we have reviewed the information available to us. I have enclosed a copy of the signed agreement. This clearly states that the cost of the policy and the level of cover being provided. It also confirms that the policy was optional.

 

Further, the full policy terms and conditions were sent out when you accepted the agreement.. This confirmed eligibility and exclusions for the policy and that if the customer was not entirely satisfied with the level of cover being provided, it could be cancelled in full without cost by writing to us within 30 days of the date of the agreement. Having checked our records we did not receive such a request in relation to this agreement.

 

On this basis, we are unable to find any evidence that the policy was mis-sold by Carland. If you are able to provide any evidence that the policy was mis-sold, please send it to us at the above address and we will investigate further.

 

I trust this explains our position.

 

Vicky Watts [pp]

 

for teh record, they didn't inc. a copy of the agreement as she suggests - I have one but that's not the point

Edited by jo5ephedward5
formatting!

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in an interesting twist, following yesterdays letter I received this one, dated a day later:

“Thank you for contacting us about your complaint. I am sorry this situation has occurred and I appreciate you taking the time to bring this to my attention.

My understanding of your complain is that you are concerned about the way that you were sold Payment Protection Insurance on your Black Horse loan. We are now gathering information and documentation relevant to your complaint.

We will respond to your complaint as soon as possible, and in any event within eight weeks from the date we received your complaint. This is in line with specific requirements that the FSA has published for the handling of PPI complaints. You can find full details of the FSA’a requirements on their website shown below:”

http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Library/Communication/PR/2011/049.shtml

it then goes on to say they have included their complaints procedure leaflet and that they will deal with this as quick as possible.

Its also signed by Vicky Watts - this time signed in her own ink not pp’s

I’m not sure what to do, the first letter dated the 14th seemed to be a tailored response say no chance but with this new one dated the 15th has suggested they’re looking into it I might just give them the 8 weeks to look into it…obviously they might not be looking into it but time will tell.

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

You now need to write to them and tell them of their failure and that if you do not receive a response in 7 days you will be opening a complaint with fos which will cost them a further £850 case fee.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Update:

 

Received a response from Black Horse following my letter to remind them they had not responded to their letter dated 15th Feb 2013 within the designated time.

 

Dear Mr E.

 

I refer to your complaint about the sale of Payment Protection Insurance.

 

Please find enclosed for your information a copy of the letter we have previously sent you in response to your complaint.

 

Your sincerely

 

Vicky Watts [PP’d]

Senior Manager.

 

 

 

So to reiterate – I wrote to them in Feb RE: PPI refund, they responded on the 14th Feb with the letter in an earlier post [number 12] refusing my claim – then on the 15th Feb I got another letter saying they were looking into it and would get back to me within 8 weeks, 8 weeks passed and no replay, I wrote again and said they were now outside of the 8 weeks and they’ve now sent me a copy of the first letter they sent from the 14th Feb!

 

 

I’m not sure what to do now.

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

...should I go back to BH one last time to state why I think I still have a valid claim - I just don't want the FOS to claim I havent exhausted the internal complaints procedure?

 

After-all just because an agreement has a signature on it bares no relevance to the legitimacy in which it was sold? - Seems very convenient to just hide behind the fact the people who did the selling are no longer trading?

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is up to you.

 

You can keep on at them for as long as you like. I think fos would see from the correspondence that you have done all you can and it is the other side who are using delaying tactics.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, should I copy BH in on any correspondence to the FOS?

 

also I've had a look at my 'loan agreement' and where PPI is selected it says in accordance with clause 7 of the agreement - clause 7 of the credit agreement is not in relation to PPI so I'm assuming this is referring to a PPI agreement - seems a little misleading to me?

 

J

People who haven't made mistakes, haven't made anything!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...