Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi With the Section 21 Notice I do hope the Landlord issued you with: Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) for the Property How to Rent Guide A current Gas Safety Certificate (if gas in the Property) If above have not been provided to the Tenant by the Landlord then they can't use a Section 21 Notice until the above have been provided (note you don't warn the Landlord of this until but put it in your defence) Have a good read of this link: Evicting tenants in England: Section 21 and Section 8 notices - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)  
    • good idea take some pix and put them in a PDF read UPLOAD dx
    • thread title updated moved to overseas debt forum. sadly as they are outside any UK jurisdiction upon DCA rules which state in the UK they must not call employers, there not alot you can do to stop these scammers. make sure you totally make private ALL social media twitter/facebook/linked in etc etc as there no-way for them to findout where you work otherwise so you must have a leak somewhere. find it. your employer details arent even legally available to UK DCA's so how have they found it out to date???  simply write to the BANK informing them of your correct and current address ALWAYS!!. if you want to arrange payment or not TO THE BANK ONLY thats upto you. never ever ignore a Statutory Demand a Letter Of Claim a Court Claimform. if if if any of those ever happen. till then ignore and rewash. dx    
    • Date of issue –   13 may 2024 AOS date 31st may defence filing date 14th june plenty of lowell card claimform threads here use our enhanced google searchbox Lowell card claimform id be reading at least 5-10 threads a day. do NOT MISS your defence filing whatever happens.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Picture Loan


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4224 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a picture loan in 2006 have “Payment Protector Insurance” which is a hefty sum of £17,714 for the insurance alone.

It states on the loan agreement that it is optional but I was told that I would not get the loan unless I had the insurance

Also I have had 3 payments back from picture for non claiming within 5 years can I claim the rest back?

 

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should be able to.

 

First thing is to get a copy of your loan agreement and total PPI contribution. If you have those, skip this bit. If you don't have those, the Data Protection Act allows you to submit a SAR (Subject Access Request), where you get all the information that the bank has on you; transactions, phone calls, international money transfers. That requires either a £10 cheque or a postal order in the UK. With the information from the SAR, you can determine how much PPI you have paid already and the accumulated interest.

 

With that information, you have to send a PPI refund request to the loan company. Look for the PPI refund templates like these:

 

http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/bills/article-1606652/LETTER-TEMPLATE-Mis-sold-PPI.html

 

Download the second one, fill in your details and send it by recorded delivery to the loan company. They will either give you a full refund, a lowball offer or became obstructive and send you back a "Final Response" letter. If you are not happy then you send in a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman. You have to fill in several forms downloadable from their website: Their general details form; the PPI complaints form.

 

Send in the whole bundle of information to the Financial Ombudsman; a copy of your loan agreement, your request for a refund, their final response from the loan company, also mention any knock-on effects it has on you financially (lost reputation, home foreclosed, lost credit rating, etc...) Best to do this by recorded delivery as well, as you can track it online.

 

Eventually, the Financial Ombudsman will send you an acknowledgement letter, and consider your case. They may ask for more details, and hopefully make a settlement in your favour. On average, there's a 64% chance of this happening.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With it being picture and picture now in default do you not have to claim through FSCS as thats what we are doing although still currently waiting to see if we have been successful or not

 

Yes, correct.

 

Picture were declared in default in July 2009 and therefore claims will be dealt with by the FSCS.

 

For the OP, given that the FSCS pay out 90% of a claim amount and as you have received rebates for "No Claims" it might be an idea to do some calculations to see whether a claim is actually worth it. Much will depend on how much in rebates you have received already.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...