Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi  Any free apps to download to pdf from android  H
    • Ok it's defence week, I need to upload 2 pics of the letters from overdales from my phone to put on here to be checked so I can file my defence. Cheers H
    • Today as the registered keeper of the vehicle photographed, I received a Parking Charge Notice, for a private land car park. I have looked at streetview and I dont think the signs are noticable, they were not placed on entry to the parking area, but on lamposts around the plot. It's not ANPR monitored but must've had someone on foot as they had photo of the vehicle parked in a bay. Is this one worth contesting or will it have to be paid?   1 Date of the infringement 28/5/24   2 Date on the NTK [this must have been received within 14 days from the 'offence' date] 4/6/24   [scan up BOTH SIDES as ONE PDF- follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'s   3 Date received 10/6/24   4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?] Yes   5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Yes   6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No   Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A   7 Who is the parking company? Parking&Property Management LTD   8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] 34-39 Magnolia House & 1-83 Cedar House Spelthorne Grove, Sunbury - on - Thames, Middlesex, TW16 7.   For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. It doesnt seem to. It states they operate in accordance with the International Parking Community's Code of Practice (IPC). On the back it says "Contesting this parking Charge" and under this heading it states that "all letters contesting a parking charge are carefully considered and replied to within 28 days. Charges are put on hold until an appeals decision has been reached. If we reject the appeal, you will be provided with the contact details of the Independent Appeals Service."   There are two official bodies, the BPA and the IAS. If you are unsure, please check HERE   If you have received any other correspondence, please mention it here Nothing else received PARKING NOTICE.pdf
    • Probably about 7 days or so. Do you have her email address?  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3862 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Without that DOA from haliprats to yourself concerning this account, IQOR don't have a legal right to process your data. And as the account is in dispute i'd tell IQOR that fact and you will see them running a mile from it, contact Halifax in writing and include a section 10 and section 12 notice under the DPA 1998. that should stop them passing your account to a DCA. if they do pass it on regardless you can take them to court and get damages for failing to comply with the data protection act.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 421
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

here is a letter i've used twice with sucesss against capquest and westcot.

The second template is a proper section 10 and section 12 notice to use on the OC. Amend to suit yourself

Letter template for DPA.txt

Section 10 Notice DPA1998 Updated version.txt

Edited by adarling2006
forgot to add something lol
Link to post
Share on other sites

The fact of the matter is Most OC's don't comply with the various act's of law, they don't comply with the Debt collection guidelines in my experience and they should pass a history of the account onto which DCA they use, it's obvious they haven't here, otherwise IQOR would have known about the Dispute and wouldn't have touched it with a 10 foot barge pole. I'd Definatly send in a CCA request and see what happens with that, if it doesn't come back then they've got themselves a bigger can or worms concerning the DPA 1998, the fact they'd have been processing data about yourself for 7 yr's without a legal right to do so, but that's another story, wait and see what happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think they must be trying to get a nest egg together for when they do finally get the bullet, as Llyods have got their own in house team at DLC/Hillsden securities, but they are all the same really, straight out of the jungle and no clue about civilized society lol.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if they intend to go to court then you can make them look totally silly by defending the claim and asking for everything under the Civil procedures rules, i've never got a far as court, they seem to be refusing to oblige me but if they do someone on here can help you more with that.

Odds on when you defend they'll back down and you win by default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

hi folks, just been reading this thread, and it seems to me that you have an application form, i do remember peterbard getting a letter about it and it took me a little time to find it but here it is, in a sense an application form is Not regarded as a credit agreement and therefore not worth the paper the bank has written it on. I will look into this more, but my understanding is if it's not a legal agreement then they have no rights to process your information as it's an improperly executed agreement and unenforceable under section 127 (iii)

 

dti

 

21 December 2006

 

Re consumer credit act 1974

 

Thank you for your letter of the 7th of December on behalf of your constituent Mr Peter Bardsley of******************* about a possible irregularity in the Consumer Credit act 1974.

 

The Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations apply to all the situations that ate listed in the Schedule to the Regulations and this include Sections 77 and 78 of the Act, which are about copies of the executed agreement and not pre contractual information

 

The Cancellation Notices and copies of Documents Regulations are made under Section 180 of the Act ) power to prescribe the form etc of documents) and Section 180 enables Regulations to be made to provide for including/excluding certain information from copies sent out under the Act. The Regulations apply to all copies sent our under the Act unless specifically excluded in the Regulations themselves.

 

Mr Bardsley describes a situation in which he was sent a copy of a company’s standard Terms and Conditions when requesting a copy of a signed agreement form. Just sending the Terms and Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement**

 

If Mr Bardsley feels that the rules are being flouted he should report the companies concerned to Trading standards and the Office of Fair Trading. It is also a breach of the Act and the Regulations to send the application form rather that a “true copy” of the Agreement.

On the point that Mr Bardsley makes about unscrupulous companies adjusting agreements, If there were a dispute about an agreement, the lender would need to prove to a court that there was an agreement and, it is highly likely that the lender would have to produce the original signed document to prove they had and agreement with the consumer to start with,

The lender should need to prove to a court that there was and agreement **and, it is highly likely that the lender would have to produce the original signed document to prove they had an agreement with the consumer to start with. If the lender can’t prove the existence of the agreement, winning any court case would prove difficult.

 

 

Approved By the Minister and signed in His presence

 

Pp Ian Mc Cartney

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the main issue here is for them to enforce it they would have to come up with a properly executed agreement that contains all the prescribed terms in it, also the terms and conditions can not be on a separate document, that is also a breach of the consumer credit act 1974. Challenge them on this and continue to ask for a properly executed agreement that you asked for under section 78 of the act and until they comply with it then no enforcement activity can continue. Also ask for the Notice of assignment which they should provide you with, if they don't have one, challenge them on what document will they be relying in court for the processing of your personal information as the app form does not say IQOR, just halifax.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 years later...

Did you ever send a SAR to halliprats? It might be useful as you can see exactly what they got, and u can start reclaiming charges and any ppi back. Also send 1st crud the account in dispute letter and remind them that the unlawful processing of your information is a breach of your human rights, bet they run away as soon as they realise you ain't no mug.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd send them a SAR and get everything they have, which is more ammo for you, and make sure you ask for all copies of notice of assignments, default notices, termination notices and all phone call logs, and everything they hold on u and get reclaiming those charges. It'll keep them busy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do need to have paperwork, the fact that they issue sd's like confetti just goes to show the abuse of the processes and used to scare people into paying up, challenge them and get costs, if they do it often enough to u they could end up paying your debt off lol

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Did you send the SAR off to haliprats, if so then you can tell 1st crud that the dispute is on going with the OC and you are awaiting information from them. Make them aware that until the dispute is resolved they should not be passing accounts on in dispute and should they try to enforce you will defend and counter claim for distress caused.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are they the historic terms and conditions or current, if current remind them that you need the terms and conditions that were in force at the time you applied. Also remind them that documentation needs to be legible and to send you a copy that is, as that is what the law and courts would require.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...