Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Link Financial Outsourcing-Threatening letters


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone,

 

After a phone call from an "Investigator" to my wife, my address was confirmed.

 

Im now receiving letters from Link who have been appointed by Thesis demanding payment in full for an outstanding SLC loan.

 

The loan was taken out 97/98, and should be the old type,

however sometime around 1999/2000 i received a CCJ (despite pleading that i had notified them of a change of address, therefore not received the deferment )

being young and broke I panicked and had been paying a monthly figure up until 2009 (I had to close my bank account from where I was sending the standing order).

 

I very nearly called them to negotiate a settlement but after discovering this most fantastic forum,

decided to ignored the 1st letter and see what happens next.

 

I have stored the number they used to contact my wife with in my phone as DO NOT ANSWER and get the odd voicemail asking me to call urgently. I don't intend to speak with them.

 

Is there anyway to find out what other numbers they use?

so we are not caught off guard. Im expecting it to get worse.

 

The next letter I received seems somehow less threatening,

however states their intentions to not allow me to leave the account unpaid.

 

They also note that they are aware that i maybe avoiding contact with them but they are sure that when I borrowed the money I had every intention to pay it back!?

 

The next paragraph says something along the lines of-- If this dept has been registered with a Credit Reference Agency it will be held against my name..

I thought it had already been held against me after the 1st CCJ?

 

The Last Paragraph says that they may place my details with the Asset Investigation Department to validate my personal data

and pursue any action that may prove necessary to recover the balance.

 

Am I in a position to continue ignoring them?

Or should I start down the road of fighting back?

after the way the SLC/Thesis and now Link have dealt with this matter,

I have no intention whatsoever of parting with any more money for them!

 

Hopefully, I've tried to be as concise as possible

Yours Thankfully

Soundman

Link to post
Share on other sites

who got the CCJ against you?

who were you paying your CCJ payments too?

did you ever get yearly statements concerning the CCJ payments [you should have!]

 

lets get your ducks in order here:

 

can you get a copy of your cra file please [see below] noddle is free.

 

i would expect nothing shows

though we need to see if link have tied the CCJ to the same debt

 

i doubt they have and that they even know about it.

 

if no-one has written to you rearding the non payment of the CCJ or enforced it

me thinks thats dead, ut ofcourse as you 'paid' on it till 2009, there might be legal redress here for them

 

for now sit tight ignore the threat

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dx

Hope you are well

 

As it was so long ago I assume it would have been passed on to Thesis to get the CCJ, The payments show on my bank statements as Student loans Company, but that could have been my note.

I have never seen any statement of any kind ever..

As for the cra file I got one from experian around 3 years ago in order that i could open another account and nothing showed up. i'll get another soon as.

 

These letters from Link are the 1st correspondence i've had from anyone about the debt or the CCJ

 

Cheers

SM

Link to post
Share on other sites

if the ccj didn't show 3yrs ago it wont now.

 

my gut reaction is this is link #doing they're usual

money making exercise from looking at old files they've purchased.

 

i'd b tempted to fire off the statute barred letter to link.

 

let them play their cards

 

i bet my bottom dollar they come back with some crap about a payment in 2007 [there usual MO]

 

if they comeback with a payments list from 2009, that would be 'interesting'.

 

just send that letter

 

stay off the phone

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

thread closed

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3854 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...