Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Black Horse / lloyds TSB PPI Rejection


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4291 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

My PPI claim has been rejected by Black Horse / Lloyds TSB. These are the reasons I said I was mis sold it.

 

I was told that this was required over the phone otherwise I wouldn’t be able to get the loan.

It was not explained to me properly.

I also was not asked if i had insurance elsewhere

 

Please see there response attached.

 

Any ideas on next stage?

 

Any help would be great thanks!

PPI Rejection.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

a very long letter of waffle!!

 

tell them to prove 'not speculate'

that you were not told it was compulsory on the phone.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

a very long letter of waffle!!

 

tell them to prove 'not speculate'

that you were not told it was compulsory on the phone.

 

dx

 

 

They do seem to have gone on a bit!! Not sure where to go next!

Link to post
Share on other sites

post 2

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi levirocks,

your letter sounds very similar to the ones I received from BlackHorse who initially rejected my claims, for me it was a case of letter ping pong using their findings against them.

 

If you applied over the phone does that mean you received your agreement pre-filled and you just had to sign where indicated?

Did your agreement state the PPI was optional, show the overall cost of the PPI?

Were you told you could cancel the PPI?

Lloyds mentioned that you had no other means in place at the time to pay the loan, hence the PPI, did they have a Needs and Demands questionnaire?

 

They have made no mention of taking this to the FOS, someone correct me if I'm wrong but I thought if they were GISC members then the FOS can still investigate.

 

The best thing is don't give up at the first hurdle it's what Lloyds wants. :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

A SAR would probably be best, that would also give you the "information and evidence" Lloyds used in during the investigation.

 

The one page with the PPI figures on is that a copy of your credit agreement?

Link to post
Share on other sites

add a line to the SAR

 

ths request is to include copies of any/all agreements with your compny.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I am not very good at responding to letters. Does this sound any good?

 

 

Thank you for your letter regarding my complaint about being mis-sold your Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) Policy.

 

I intend to take this case to the Financial Ombudsman Service as I am unhappy with your decision.

 

I am awaiting details back from an SAR I have sent you which will give me more details to go the Financial Ombudsman Service with.

 

With regard to your replies I was NOT asked by your salesperson if I had adequate insurance cover through a separate income protection policy.

 

Also, When I took out the loan, I was told that my application would be refused if I did not also buy a PPI policy. The Financial Services Authority’s advice to consumers is that, while it does not breach FSA guidelines, a borrower should not be refused a loan if they choose not to buy an insurance policy.

 

 

In forcing me to buy this policy, you have also breached paragraph 8.6 of the Banking Code, to which you are a signatory.

 

I am requesting a full refund of all my insurance payments plus interest.

 

If I do not receive a favourable response from you within 14 days I will pursue this claim through the Financial Ombudsman.

 

Yours faithfully,

Link to post
Share on other sites

i would also add:

 

'Unless you have an actual transcript or recording of the matter 'i feel it is unfair for your to introduce 'pure speculation'

on what might or might not have happened in a telephone conversation you were not a party too,.

 

Using mere referance to your guidelines at the time to justify your refusal that 'it did not happen'

'because' those were in place, is wrong and unfair.

 

i strongly believe there was a culture of commission based selling during this period.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi there guys

 

Just wondering if Levirocks has any update in this issue?

 

I too received pretty much the same letter from Lloyds TSB this morning as the OP did in the first post. I'm now drafting a letter of complaint at the decision made and wondering where I go from here? Would I be correct in saying this is a standard rejection response as our two letters are so similar ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

start your own thread

 

see below

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...