Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject.   My original  CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  So at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them.   Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.  
    • whats the court claimform for? return of goods order? please complete this:  
    • std DWF letter. typically £157 something. lots of them here already doesn't say WILL anything. read it properly dx  
    • Have you read our upload guide [click on the word] for advice on how to post up documents? Pdf files are best, jpegs won't be accepted. HB
    • Sunak's already had enough of travelling like the little people. Rishi Sunak flies back from Devon by helicopter after gushing about 'great' train travel - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK Rishi Sunak told broadcasters: 'The train was great, I've been taking lots of pictures and videos' - but he skipped the 3-hour, £55 train home in favour of...  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Ccj


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4429 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Foxy, I'm going to same thing at the moment with a DCA who used the incorrect address trick to obtain a judgement by default despite knowing my real address.

 

Things I learnt and you need to start off with.

 

1) act quickly, depending on the judge you get, how long to took to apply for the set aside from first knowing about the CCJ can be a factor to not grant the set aside.

 

2) you can apply for set aside on mandatory grounds if the claim was issued at the wrong address, however there is a caveat here, a claimant can use a "LAST KNOWN ADDRESS". So it's not just a case of showing that it was the wrong address, you need to show the claimant was fully aware of your correct address

 

3) failing 2) you can still set aside on not knowing about the proceedings due to wrong address (wether claimant was/wasn't aware) AND you have a realistic prospect of winning.

 

I'd concentrate on trying have the set aside on 2) but also be prepared that should you fail 2) you have enough grounds to argue 3)

 

Although I'd clarify this with the experienced legal seagulls around here.

 

Re 3) you are going to need to post up some details aboout the allledged debt so experts here can work on this part of the defence if you need to use it.

 

Good Luck, as I say I'm going through the same thing at the moment

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to add - I received a letter from a company called 'Moneysense' - it said - we're sorry to hear about your recent CCJ - it had the amount and all the other intricate details etc - saying we can help you sort it out and will pay £40 court costs blah blah blah. How have they sent this to my correct address ? if this CCJ has been obtained at my old address - is this anything to do indirectly with BC? Just thought it was strange :-(

 

LOL, SNAP!

 

Recieved the same thing aswell, it's what alerted me to my CCJ. Funnily enough I got another one today (yes sunday).

 

Was it in a hand written envelope ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi foxy,

 

First thing, regarding the incorrect address, do you have any proof they knew your correct address ? i.e. either a letter from them or the OC creditor at your correct address or a subsequent address to which they claimed at? if not from what I understand they can use the last known address to effect service.

 

However that doesnt mean all is not lost, you can still set aside arguing that you were unaware of proceedings and if you were, you would of had a good chance of defending.

 

The difference is that with the former you can have the case set aside on mandatory grounds, the latter you will have to show the court you have a realistic defence aswell.

 

regarding the OC, this should should be shown on your case file from the court in the Particulars of claim as the POC's have to show the origin of the debt.

 

Assuming its Northampton, ring them up and they will send the paperwork in the post quite swifity if the case is still with them.

 

The other thing with these incorrect address cases, is that as discussed above they suddenly discover your new address and start enforcement action immediatly, Usually an AoE. They use Linkedin and facebook to discover your employers.

 

so there is a good chance when you ring up Northampton that the case has been already sent to your local court, if it has, pop down there and they will be able to give you paperwork there and then.

 

in all correspondence with the court either in person or on the phone you will need to quote to your claim number, this will be on your letter from the CCJ company.

 

one final tip, be very nice and polite to the court no matter how frustrated you are and awkward they are, if you're polite and courtesious enough, you will find they are actually quite reasonable with you. e.g. my first phonecall with northampton they gave me the POC's over the phone and posted over a copy of my case file the next day despite the fact the case had already been transferred. Likewise when I went to my local court, they let me know that my claimant had taken further action against me at the wrong address and the person I was dealing with at the court realised I wouldnt know about this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Hi everyone

 

I have had a good look in all my old papers and have found 3 letters from various DCAs about this debt - and they are all to my correct address!! One of them is even dated 2 days after the lady at BC said they had taken over the debt!! Should I include copies of these? - more to try and evidence that if these 3 companies had my correct address then the chances are that BC did also - or do you think it would make the judge look less favourably on my application for receiving these letters and doing nothing about it?? I am going to carry on looking and try and locate a letter from BC at my correct address as this would be ideal - but I'm just thinking ahead in case I can't find one.

 

Many thanks as always for your guidance and comments.

 

Foxy

 

Ideally it would be better to have one from BC, as I guess BC will claim that the other companies independently traced you..

 

However I suppose that if they did go down that route, you could claim that you were easily traceable something shown by the fact other companies were able to trace you. Also DCA's has a duty to correctly identify and trace people before pursuing a debt, especially if they are going to take enforcement action.

 

My Guess, from reading the thread is that BC is going for the "Service was effected" route by using your last known address, which is covered by the CPR rules and thus will argue that you can't get the set aside on Mandatory grounds.

 

If this is deliberate ploy by BC, which it seems it is, it may be the case that they have been careful not to leave a paper trail that proves they knew your correct address all along.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...