Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Just a typo change that I'd make for the last line. Maybe also add something that says "I assume you will be fully aware that you cannot rely on a clause of a contract that you do not produce."
    • Hello, Firstly, and most importantly I am sorry for your loss. I would go back to the bank with the death certificate and ask them to step in. Remind them firmly but politely that there is no limit for DD claims   Please let us know how you get on.
    • My wife is the named person to his bank account with him having Dementia being his daughter (I say named person she still is but he recently passed away and the deputyship application has now being stopped by the solicitor as it's no longer needed) We've only just got the Death Certificate so the bank will be the next step informing them. She went to the bank and explained the situation but even being his named person the bank said she didn't have the power to stop DD without any legal documents (virgin money) was the bank. She could have copies of bank statements that was about it.
    • I see you said you tried to stop the DD but it seems that didn't work. May I please ask why that didn't work? You should be asking your bank to cancel the DD and I don't see why they would have objected, hopefully you can clarify this. I agree that you should be making a claim here against your bank and ask them for a DD refund. There is no timeframes for this.
    • Thanks DX,   I wasn't aware we could do that for that length of time. I'll ask my wife to check with the bank this week
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PPI calcultion help HBOS


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4407 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone. I have received my SAR from HBOS for my credit card started in 1999 which I closed in 2007 (and yes they have sent statements for all of these dates :-o) I am now completing the running PPI calculator but do I need to continue after I cancelled PPI in 2003 or do I continue to the card cancellation date

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Continue to the card cancellation date, that way you have a full reconstruction of the account

 

ims

 

 

PS...are you saying you got statements/transaction history back to 1999?

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I finally stopped in Dec 2005 as all the statements after that had a zero balance, So being realistic what can i roughly expect to get from them, Would it be just the PPI or would I get simple 8% or can I expect the compound interest too. I have been self employed since I was 18 years old so it was definatley a mis sell

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, Should I put the calculation sheet in with my claim letter? ( Sorry for all the questions this is my 1st one)

 

Don't worry about questions....that is what we are all here for.

 

Yes included a copy of the spreadsheet with your claim letter. Don't forget to also send the completed fos questionnaire

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Today I have recieved a rejection from HBOS for my credit card claim

 

My reasons for mis sell were, I have been self employed since the age of 18 and I have always had a seperate insurance in place in the event that I couldn't work and any policy would of been no good to me. Also I was not aware of the PPI being added to the account.

 

Their reasons for rejection are.

I applied for the PPI by direct mail ( I don't remember doing this)

 

The policy documentation would of explained the limitations of the PPI and I was not significatley affected by the exclusions. (surely any exclusions make the ppi not worth having)

 

The CCA shows an additional signature in the consent form to confirm that you wanted PPI added to your account. (There has been no copy of the CCA sent to me when I SAR'd them. The account was closed in 2007 so I didn't expect one )

 

So my question is do I contact them again stating my points above or do I go direct to the FOS

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

If it were me I'd write back and refute each point on which they base their decision and go into as much detail as you need to.

 

Tell them that if they have this evidence of your signature on a consent form you want to see it and they should send it to you. Ask them to explain why this piece of personal data was not sent to you with your SAR request as you are sure the ICO would be interested in the reasoning behind withholding data.

 

I would give them one more go purely because fos will take a long time and if you can resolve this yourself it will be quicker.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...