Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • So, Sunak has managed to get someone to 'volunteer to go to Rwanda hasn't he? .. for just £3000 payment to the person plus 5 years free board and lodging isnt it? - cost to UK taxpayer over £300M+ (300 million quid+) isnt it? - Bargain says Rwanda, especially with all the profit we made privately selling those luxury chalets Bravermann advertised for us   I wonder how many brits would jump at that offer? Thousands? Hundreds of thousands? Lets see, up to 5 years free board and lodging and £3k in my pocket .. I'd go - and like that person - just come back if/when I get bored. First job - off to Botswana for a week to see the elephants.   Of course the paid volunteers going to Botswana are meaningless - Rwanda have REPEATEDLY said they wont take any forcibly trafficked people in breach of international law eh? Have they actually got any civil servants to agree to go yet - probably end up as more massive payments to VIPal contractors to go and sit there doing nowt shortly eh?    
    • Hi Wondered if I could get a little advise please. I entered into a commercial lease (3 years) and within a few months I had to leave as the business I was trading with collapsed. I returned the keys to the landlord and explained the situation and no money, also likely to go on benefits but the landlord stuck to their guns. They have now instructed solicitors to send letter before action claiming just over £4000. The lease was mine and so the debt. I know this. I have emailed the solicitors twice to explain I am out of work and that with help from family I could offer a full and final settlement figure of £1500 or £10pw. This was countered by them with an offer to reduce the debt by £400, or pay off the amount over 12 months. I went back with an improved full and final offer of £2500 or £20pw. This has been rejected with the comment 'papers ready to go to court'. I have no hope of paying the £4000 and so it will have to go to court. Pity as I have no debts otherwise but not working is a killer. I wondered if they take me to court, could I ask for mediation? I also think that taking me to court will result in a pretty much nothing per week payment from my benefits. Are companies just pushing ahead with action even if a better offer is on the table? Thanks for your help.
    • Hi all, Many thanks for the advice! Unfortunately, the reply to the email was as expected…   Starbucks UK Customer Care <[email protected]> Hi xxxxxx, We are sorry to read you received a parking charge after using our Stansted Airport - A120 DT store. Unfortunately, the car park here is managed by MET parking. Both Starbucks and EuroGarages who own and operate this site are not able to help and have no authority to overturn any parking charges received. If you have followed the below terms then you would need to send all correspondence to [email protected], who will be able to assist you further. Several signs around the car park clarify the below terms and conditions: • Maximum stay 60 minutes, whilst the store is open. If the store is closed, pay to park applies. • The car park is for Starbucks customers only who make a purchase in our store, a charge will be issued if you left the site. • If you had made a purchase and required additional time, you must have inputted your registration number into the in store iPad which would have extended your stay up to 3 hours • To park in a disabled bay, you must have displayed a valid disabled badge. • If Starbucks was closed, you must have paid for parking as charges still apply, following signage located on site. • If you didn’t use the store, you must have paid for parking, following signage located on site Please ensure all further correspondence is directed to MET parking at the above email address, and accept our apologies that we cannot help you further on this matter.  Kind Regards,  Lora K  Customer Care Team Leader Starbucks Coffee Company, Building 4 Chiswick Park, London, W4 5YE
    • Thanks HB edited and re-uploaded. Thanks for the heads up 👍
    • Am in the middle of selling my house but it's been held up as still showing a change on the property from welcome finance, have not had any contact from them for years or prime credit and need this sorting asap
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFC Secured loan - Restons seeking possession & no arrears- Please help


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4432 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

Any help gratefully received.

 

I entered into a loan with HFC ten years ago. I made payments fine until I lost my job. Eventually I got work and paid the arrears but in the meantime HFC referred the case to Restons. I have been paying them for a year and a half.

 

I admit that I sometimes paid them late, payments were meant to be made by the 1st of the month but always paid religously every month. Due to ill health my payment in January was made on the 16th of the month.

 

I was shocked to receive a possession notice and the hearing is scheduled for next week. I have made numerous calls to Restons to query this but they say it is in my contract, I have not adhered to the payment terms.

 

I have asked for the amount to settle. On the court papers they say £10554 (I have paid £517 since they were issued)

 

I have just had a call from them and they say i owe £11023.57, which includes their costs. They say if I go to court the costs will go up. I don't know what to do, I don't want my house repossessed. I have scraped together £10000 which I thought I would owe. Will the judge have mercy on me or is it best to pay them off.

 

I am angry with myself but these charges seem extortionate. On the court papers they say costs £0.00.

 

Can anyone advise?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Goodness, don't let them bully you.

 

Yes, the costs of going to court will be passed onto you, but it is preferable for you to allow a judge to adjudicate on this, rather than have these people think they can beat you with a stick.

 

They are correct in thinking they can take you to court for being late with payments - but they are incorrect in thinking that they will get much out of it other than their costs of taking you there, because with no arrears at all, there isn't a judge in the land who is going to make a possession order, let alone a suspended one.

 

The amount you owe is small - so it may be that your loan is regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and if it is (check your original loan paperwork), then the judge will have jurisdiction to be able to change your payment date, since that appears to be an issue that you have with making payments on time. However, this is an application you will need to make to the court, it is not something you can request the court consider in defence to a possession claim (you will be making an application for a Time Order).

 

Costs are listed as 0 on the court paperwork, because all costs arising will be contractual (your original contract will state they can charge any costs of legal action to your account).

 

Write to them, tell them that you wish to discuss a full and final payment with them and offer them say 7.5k. They will probably tell you that they want more, in which case you can say that is all you have, or up it a little. Don't offer the full 10k immediately.

 

You may also be able to claim any charges they have made to your account - every time you are late paying, they will almost certainly have added a charge.

 

How much was the original loan for?

How much have you paid so far?

Are you certain you have no outstanding payments?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lea

Thx for the reply. The original loan was for £40,000. I have been paying for eight years at £513.71 per month, so £49,316.16.

 

The loan is being handled by Restons who are extremely agressive. I tried to agree an f &f with them two years ago but as it is a secured loan they were not interested.

 

At present I DO owe the March payment of £513.71, which I have held back as I didn't want to pay that on top of any agreed settlement. I have not had any breakdown of charges nor any Default Notices from Restons. To be truthful I am not sure if they need to provide these.

 

I am very scared as I don't want a suspended possession order and have read horror stories on here about judges ordering repossession. However I am not a risk at all as I have never been more than two weeks late with a payment and have absolutely no arrears.

 

Would it be worth paying them off and fighting the charges later?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't withhold the March payment - they can and will use that as a missed payment in a repossession hearing. Pay it - you can always reduce your full and final offer by taking into account any payments you make whilst negotiating.

 

You can send the company a Subject Access Request Notice (you will find various copies of this letter all over the forum that you can adapt to your own needs), and they will have to provide you with all the information they hold on you, which will include all statements, you can send the same letter to the original lender too. Once you have this, you will be able to work out what charges have been made. They have 40 days to provide you with this information, so it is essential that you continue making payments in the interim if you do not want to face proceedings in court.

 

It is doubtful that a court would make any kind of order because you are regularly two weeks late with payments - so long as arrears aren't building up, that is virtually a non-issue that the lender could rectify very easily by changing your payment date. A court will not look kindly on them bringing you into court for such nonsense, let alone award them possession.

 

I think it's worth negotiating a full and final settlement, but I think you should get all the information via the SAR notice first, so you can make an offer that reflects what you still owe, not including their charges, which are undoubtedly unreasonable.

 

Do not be bullied by these people - it's easier to negotiate whilst you still owe them money, rather than paying them and trying to get it back thereafter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...