Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • 4 hours were soft play with the kids then moved to one of the restaurants for a meal. Restaurant took ages with our order but it was a group of parents so we were in no massive rush.  Ive been trying to find how to determine 100% if the road is public or not as I just based my assumption on the street signs, traffic lights and the bus. Regarding the PCN, does it covers all requirements needed to enforce or do you guys see any clear weak spots? Considering the size of the place and different areas and businesses reachable through that road where the cameras are, I believe is a massive assumption to use those photographs to calculate the time someone was actually parked in a designated parking spot as there are numerous other areas to load, unload, wait for people, drive throughs of restaurants, etc all within the area accessible through the one road where the ANPR is. One can go through most of the areas on street view in google. You can even see a car parked in the middle of the roundabout for example.
    • thought your story rang a bell. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/416315-knightsbridgecreditfix-iva-treated-me-very-badly-thinking-of-bk-now-help/ you vanished and never cameback. dx  
    • and it legally informs them of your correct and current address as you must do with all old debts last paid/used in say 7 yrs you dont want backdoor CCJ's. what were the names of these IVA scammers, the one you took it out with, and the one that scammed you to let them take over please? your story is slightly worrying. dx  
    • Incidentally, congratulations on not buying the warranty. That is another Big Motoring World rip-off. See what we have to say about extended warranties and the Big Motoring World attitude to them is particularly unhelpful
    • well that google is from 2019, but the photos are certainly of someone driving on the public highway in/out by an ANP system, though the site of where the camera actually is, is not showing there are anpr cameras up by the low yellow barriers but they wont get from facing shots from there. interesting, needs to be checked if the road IS a public highway but on private land, cause as you say, if the whole area is max 4hrs , how does the hotel work< ?? must have a reg entry system.  now as for taking pictures of cars on a public highway then guessing the are parking ...erm.... i dont thnk thats right nor allowed under GDPR. dx  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Some advice please on brighthouse practice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4485 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:|HI all

 

firstly i apologise if my question has been answerd on a previous thread, i have looked but did not find it.

 

i currently have a tv through brighthouse which next month i will be 2 years into the agreement so clearly paid mpore than a third off.

ill be ahonest here im not the best payer in the world and frequently miss payments but by no more than 2 weeks.

my payments are usually a week late if anything but i always pay.

 

these last few months whenever my payment is late we are getting harrasing phonecalls on a daily basis to make payment.

at present i am 2 weeks in arrears which is a grand total of just under £20 (huge money)

today i have had a visit while i was out by 2 of the staff from my local store (both their names were written on the card.

the card was telling me they they called to discuss my account and remove goods to which i have to be honest about at first it did make me chuckle all for £20.

my wife fished out our agreement from when we took the finance out on 29th march 2010.

i was reading the bit about

REPOSSESION : YOUR RIGHTS.

"if you do not keep your side of the agreement but you have paid at least one third of the total ammount payable under this agreement that is xxxxxxx we may not take back the goods against your wishes unless we get a court order. if we do take th egoods without your consent or a court order you have the right to get back any money that you have paid under this agreement.

 

so my question is this, if they come to the house and im at work and my wife lets them in but refuses to sign the form and they remove the goods without ME giving consent.

would this mean that i can get my money back that i have paid so far,

 

i know this may sound strange to some but i am sick and tired of seeing these companies bully and harass people.

me and my wife have discussed this and we no longer wish to have any dealings with brighthouse.

so what could be classed as me giving consent to take the goods?

would it have to be my signature or would my wife letting them into the house be classed as consent.

i have advised my wife they if they come to the door and im at work just to let them in and try and talk about it reoasnably but not to try and stop them or cause a fuss if they want to remove goods but to stipulate that she is not giving them permission to do so.

this way i would be able to get my money back from them.

 

really sorry for the long speech but just want to make sure i know where i stand against these bullies.

 

just us a quick note, when i phone them to make my payment up from the previous week they always say that they cannot take it unless i pay that weeks payment at the same time althogh it is not due untill the saturday.

apparently the system does not allow this...:???:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Your wife doesnt even have to let them in - unless they have a court order and you would know about that as a claim would have needed to be issued in the first instance.

 

You should be making a complaint to the OFT about this harrassment.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

thank you for such a quick response.

what i ultimatly wanted to do (yes this may be the wrong way to go about things ) but is to get my money back from them as i realy do not want this company inmy life any more.

i was hoping if we just played ball with them and let them carry out there nasty deed of removing the goods without my consent would this be the the bast way of getting my money back.

 

Your wife doesnt even have to let them in - unless they have a court order and you would know about that as a claim would have needed to be issued in the first instance.

 

You should be making a complaint to the OFT about this harrassment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

keep that card safe as well. That is evidence.

Isn't it strange how when we hear of this, BH say it is a one off thing yet we hear this time and time again.

Do BrightHouse advocate unlawful practices. Answers on a postcard dropped through a letterbox.

 

The only way they can take the goods back is if

a) You let them

b) They get a court order

c) You leave the goods outside

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

they would also be acting against the law

 

which is why i posted that link.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If i'm right in what i'm thinking, you are wanting to give the goods back and recover any payments you have made thus far?

 

Firstly if i was you i would NOT let them in to your property unless they turn up with a court order or you are consenting for them to take the goods,

anything they wish to discuss can be talked about at the door,

after all we are only talking about 2 weeks late payments here (plus late payment charges).

 

Unfortunately (im no expert so i would double check) you will not be able to claim any money back from them if you wish to return the goods.

On your agreement there will be a section titled Termination: Your Rights.

 

On an agreement i have in front of my from an item i have purchased from them it states :

 

'You have a right to end this agreement.

To do so, you should write to the person you make your payments to.

We will then be entitled to the return of the goods and to HALF the total amount payable under the agreement, that is £XXX.XX.

If you have already payed at least this amount plus any overdue instalments and have taken reasonable care of the goods, you will not have to pay any more.'

 

I understand where you are coming when you say 'if they take the goods without consent are they breaching the agreement'.

If i were you i would find out if they need written consent to remove goods.

If you invite them in and let them remove goods, in my opinion this would be considered as consent and it doesnt state on the agreement that it has to be 'written' consent.

 

If this was to get messy and go to small claims court, you might have a battle on your hands proving you did not give them verbal consent,

i would also consider the fact you are a self admitted regular late payer.

 

Lets get thing in to perspective,

i know you are angry about the harrasment and this issue definately needs to be adressed

but are you really willing to let them walk away with your two years of payments then put your tv back on the shelf as reconditioned or alternatively have a small claims court battle,

all because of two weeks late paymnets (plus any late payment charges).

 

If i were you i would just bite the bullet pay the account up to date,

finish paying the last year on the tv off and never deal with them again now you know what to expect from them.

 

pinkfloydianuk

ALL COMMENTS OR SUGGESTIONS MADE ARE BASED ON MY OWN EXPERIENCES AND OPINIONS, IF IN DOUBT SEEK ADVICE FROM A QUALIFIED SOLICITOR.

 

<<<<IF YOU LIKE WHAT YOU READ, DON'T FORGET TO HIT THE STAR AND GIVE ME SOME REP.

 

ANY PRIVATE MESSAGES DEEMED TO BE NON SUBJECT RELATED, DEROGATORY OR INSULTING WILL BE REPORTED.

 

pinkfloydianuk

 

:attention:

Link to post
Share on other sites

'they' can NEVER take goods even WITH a COURT ORDER

 

they are NOT bailiffs and NEVER EVER will be

 

only court bailiffs can take goods - end of!!!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

and they have NO remit to add ANY penalty charges either.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
but if my wife states that she is not giving them consent to remove goods then surely they are clearly in breach of the agreement if they do so

 

They will lie. They will say that she consented, and there's two of them to swear to it. You will never prove otherwise. Unless your wife is able and willing to wear a recording device, this is a poor tactic. If she's ready for a bit of espionage then it might work out really well - catch them on tape saying that they are taking the goods against her protests, and you have an unloseable claim.

Link to post
Share on other sites

so how long will it take them to get a court order to remove my goods? and if they cannot remove my goods as you say DX how do they go about getting their items back.

 

 

im currently 2 weeks i arears and my local store called me threatening to come and remocve my goods. but when i spke up and said "fine go get yourself a court order then come back to me" she shut up then tried to explain that they do not need a court order,n after the discussion went on for a few more mins she finaly gave in and i think she recognised that i was not going to juts lay down and take it and that i knew what i was talking about (all thanks to CAG).

 

apologies for the bad spelling.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can't say I have heard of any company (BH,BAYV,Perfect Homes) going to court. I'm sure it must happen on occasion.

Obviously you could hand the goods back or you could come to some arrangement to clear the arrears but do not sign a new agreement without checking with CAG first

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi silver fox

I have just spoke their head office and they refuse to let me make the payments up over a period if time as they don't accept part payments.

I stated that if it wasn't for there unlawful fees I would be able to bring my account up to date. I asked if they would waive these fees to which they refused.

 

I'm currently waiting for my paperwork from Brighthouse do I claim back all the fees they have charged me over the last few years.

Bit don't know where I go from here in my current situation. Even if I offer to make a small payment try actually refuse to take it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Write to head office, with the account number. Say that you are struggling financially, but you wish to pay as much as you can towards the arrears. Enclose a cheque for a small but useful amount - £20 to £50. They will phone you to refuse it, because they know that to put that in writing makes them look very bad. Have a tape recorder ready.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...