Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help with a PPi claim G E Custom finance


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4200 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

Dropping in as requested by CB

 

Very odd looking agreement as regards the insurance goes. Looks like you were paying £19.33 per month for some type of insurance but it doesn't say what type.

 

Have you got any other documentation for this HP at all?

 

Even if it is not PPI, it is still an insurtance whoich could have been mis-sold and therefore reclaimed.

 

Do you have the written settlement statement when the account was finally closed and terminated?

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

OK so its PPI then and if you didn't want it or request it then it has been put on the account without consent and has been mis-sold.

 

Go here

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?330996-Latest-Spreadsheets-PPI-Claims-and-Charges-Claims-Dec-2011(1-Viewing)-nbsp

 

and grab the forst spreadsheet (StatIntV101.xls) and complete it listing the date of the payment, the description (i.e. "PPI Payment") and the amount of £19.33 for each normal payment you actually made.

 

As the payments would have stopped when you settled the loan and the entire premium wasn't added up front it would seem that this is just a regular payment PPI so you would stop the entries at the date you settled the account.

 

When you have completed the sheet, the green box at the top will give you a claim amount.

 

Go along to the fos website and download the consumer questionnaire and complete it.

 

Send a copy of your spreadsheet and the completed questionnaire to the lender together with a brief letter requesting the refund.

 

Lets see what they say.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
ok have had a letter back off GE Money basically saying that they are unable to locate an account on their systems and as they do not sufficient info to respond to my complaint they we be marking it closed on theie records.

 

If i have any new info that might enable them to locate an account i should send it to them i originally sent a covering letter and the spreadsheet and the fos questionairre i do have the agreement here should i resend all this again with a copy of the agreement.

 

TTS

 

So they are trying to wriggle then.

 

Yep send them a copy of the agreement and, if possible, a snapshot of the payments you have made.

 

Strong letter saying that it clear from this evidence that PPI was paid to them and you want it back.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

On a regulated agreement their "approved Introducer" acts as their agent and S56 of the Consumer Credit Act could be helpful to you by challenging them yourself in the first place.

 

If your agreement is regulated tell them that you will be using S56 if this goes further and it squarely puts them in the frame for the conduct of their agent/broker. You can also tell them that should you need to take this further you will be backing your complaint up with this whether it be to fos or via the courts.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...