Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • wont go near it with a barge pole as its ex gov't debt.  
    • Thanks, I've had my fill of this lot. What makes me so mad is that I had to take out student loan to get any DHSS help. And then when I tried to help myself and family they presented obstacles. Might be worth passing story to RIP off Britain?
    • there is NO exposure if you simple remove your name address/ref numbers etc from docs, over 10'000 pdf uploads are here. which then harvests IP addresses off of the people that then do so..which is why we do not allow hosting sites. read our rules and upload carefully thats exactly why we say capture as JPG, redact, then convert/merge to one mass PDF. then online sites to achieve that we list do not leave watermarks.  every once in a while we have a user like you that thinks they know better...we've been doing it since 2006 with not one security issue. thank you.
    • was at the time you ticked it  but now they've still not complied . if you read up, here , you'll see thats what everyone does,  
    • no they never allow the age related get out, erudio are masters at faking supposed 'arrears' fees which were levied before said date and thus null its write off. 1000's of threads here on them!! scammers untied that lot. i can almost guarantee they'll state it's not SB'd too re above, but just ignore them once sent. dx    
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

housing benefit fraud conviction


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4519 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

I am new to the site and not sure if this is the correct place for me to post but it seems the most relevant section.

Basically I have been convicted of 'failure to declare change of circumstances' in regards to housing benefit and council tax, and due to the amount (which was £4170) I have been given 80 hours of unpaid work. The problem I have is that I am currently taking a year out of my primary teaching studies with the view to return in september of this year to complete my final year. The worry I have is whether a) I will be allowed to return to the course due to me having to have an enhanced crb check and b) If i am able to return to the course will it affect me gaining employment?

I'm hoping there are others on here in similar circumstances or who may have been through this and gained employment (or not) that could offer advice.

I'm in two minds at the minute as to whether its worth me returning to my studies but would appreciate any advice if possible.

Thanks in advance

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Lucy.

 

I've moved your post to our employment forums as the question is related to employability rather than eligibility for benefit.

 

Having a conviction on record does not necessarily mean that you would not be considered, unless that conviction suggested that you would be inappropriate for the role. It may prevent you from working in finance but not necesserily from teaching.

 

In regard to the course, you will need to check with the establishment which provides the course whether having a conviction for benefit fraud would preclude you from the course.

  • Confused 1

My advice is based on my opinion, my experience and my education. I do not profess to be an expert in any given field. If requested, I will provide a link where possible to relevant legislation or guidance, so that advice provided can be confirmed and I do encourage others to follow those links for their own peace of mind. Sometimes my advice is not what people necesserily want to hear, but I will advise on facts as I know them - although it may not be what a person wants to hear it helps to know where you stand. Advice on the internet should never be a substitute for advice from your own legal professional with full knowledge of your individual case.

 

 

Please do not seek, offer or produce advice on a consumer issue via private message; it is against

forum rules to advise via private message, therefore pm's requesting private advice will not receive a response.

(exceptions for prior authorisation)

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What is the coviction down as. The wording of a conviction has a lot to do with what happens.

 

Bit like Fraud - bad but not to bad, Conspiracy to defraud - by by any chance of working for the next 10 to 15 years..

 

Just an example of what i mean by the wording and how it changes things.

Edited by nohope
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Erika,

 

Thanks for the reply and for moving it to the appropriate forum.

 

Nohope, thanks for the reply...my solicitor has assured me that it will not go on my crb as fraud it will be what the conviction was which is 'failure to declare a change of circumstances' which i believe is under section 112a of the social security administration act. This means it was without intent from what i can gather.

Thanks again,

Lucy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Queensclose, as far as i am aware it will be failure to declare a change of circumstances...at least this is what my solicitor has informed me. My original claim for HB and CTB was fine but i failed to let them know i had become a full time student.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well i'm keeping my fingers crossed and contacting the governing body for teachers as there's a code of conduct that you have to follow as a teacher so hopefully they will feel that it won't affect me practicing as a teacher.

thanks again for reply

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...