Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • @Man in the middle I've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Thanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe concenquences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points?
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

HELP just paid £800 to have a clamp removed due to PCN charges


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4542 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi There,

 

My Husband has just informed me that he had to pay £800 to Bailiffs to remove a clamp relating to a PCN for Wandsworth Council back in 2010.

He has received to paperwork regarding this, can the bailiff do this even though the car was on private property at the time?

apparently had a warrant which relates to a different address. does this make the warrant invalid if on private property?

can we get a refund?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you list what paperwork your husband has received and sent and when? It'll be something like 1. PCN from council, 2. (appeal from husband?), 3. rejection, 4. Notice to Owner from council, 5. (appeal from husband?), 6. Notice of Rejection, 7. Charge Certificate, 8. Order for Recovery, 9. Bailiff. When you say the warrant was for a different address, did you move house and not inform the DVLA (in other words, all the paperwork I've just listed has gone to some old address?)

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replying,

Well we haven't received anything as we moved in July 2010. We didn't inform DVLA so I'm not sure what would have been sent to our previous address.

I believe the warrant address the bailiff had was our previous one.

Apparently the bailiff spotted him whilst he was driving to work and followed him to his office.

I have checked and the bailiff is certified. Can a bailiff use a warrant of execution on private property? as this happened whilst my husband was at work. They have a private Car park with security.

Also can a bailiff charge for each visit? or is it just the statutory charges?

Link to post
Share on other sites

apparently had a warrant which relates to a different address. does this make the warrant invalid

 

yes

 

 

 

 

have a read of these threads will ask for this tread to be moved to the bailiffs forum

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?251314

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?332096-Bailiff-and-parking-penalty

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you didn't inform the DVLA of your change of address dosn't get you off a PCN i'm afraid. Yes the bailiff can clamp on private land if it has unristricted public access or he has been allowed in. But to get to the bailiff stage, a lengthy process has had to been taken in the form of what Manx has posted. This would of given you opportunity to appeal the original PCN at various stages. Not sure how you can get a refund now as the process has ended. You would have to have a pretty good argument that the PCN was issued incorrectly in the first plave I would of thought or there has been some kind of clerical error (on the council's part) resulting in you not receiving any correspondence.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you didn't inform the DVLA of your change of address dosn't get you off a PCN i'm afraid. Yes the bailiff can clamp on private land if it has unristricted public access or he has been allowed in. But to get to the bailiff stage, a lengthy process has had to been taken in the form of what Manx has posted. This would of given you opportunity to appeal the original PCN at various stages. Not sure how you can get a refund now as the process has ended. You would have to have a pretty good argument that the PCN was issued incorrectly in the first plave I would of thought or there has been some kind of clerical error (on the council's part) resulting in you not receiving any correspondence.

 

Not quite right although I agree the ticket has to be paid. All the correspondence has gone to a previous address & the Warrant is for the old address although the Bailiff has now "cleansed" this - this is not allowed and the ticket has to revert back & can be charged back out at its original price.

Please consider making a small donation to help keep this site running

 

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just because you didn't inform the DVLA of your change of address dosn't get you off a PCN i'm afraid. Yes the bailiff can clamp on private land if it has unristricted public access or he has been allowed in. But to get to the bailiff stage, a lengthy process has had to been taken in the form of what Manx has posted. This would of given you opportunity to appeal the original PCN at various stages. Not sure how you can get a refund now as the process has ended. You would have to have a pretty good argument that the PCN was issued incorrectly in the first plave I would of thought or there has been some kind of clerical error (on the council's part) resulting in you not receiving any correspondence.

That wasn't my question. What I need to find out is how can a PCN amount to £800.00 and a warrant for 1 address cannot be used for another which is private property the bailiff had no paperwork. The warrant was on his phone not a paper copy.

Bailiffs should not be allowed to fleece people like this and simply get away with it

Link to post
Share on other sites

That wasn't my question. What I need to find out is how can a PCN amount to £800.00 and a warrant for 1 address cannot be used for another which is private property the bailiff had no paperwork. The warrant was on his phone not a paper copy.

Bailiffs should not be allowed to fleece people like this and simply get away with it

 

I will do my best to answers your questions

 

A bailiff enforcing a Pcn can levy /clamp/ remove a vehicle from private property

 

not 100% sure about the warrant having to be on paper I'm sure it can be done by electronic transfer which would/may cover his phone

 

The most important thing about this is the address on the warrant is your previous address which means you did not receive the PCN ,notice to owner ECT

 

you need to get in touch with TEC on Monday and ask them to confirm the address the address on the warrant(this will be your previous address) they will e-mail you the forms for you to fill out (as per tomtubbys post on the link in post 4)

 

Once /if it is accepted (and i see no reason why it wont be) the PCN reverts back to the original fine

 

any overpayment should be recovered from your local authority they are fully responsible for all actions of there bailiffs including there fees

Link to post
Share on other sites

I will do my best to answers your questions

 

A bailiff enforcing a Pcn can levy /clamp/ remove a vehicle from private property

 

not 100% sure about the warrant having to be on paper I'm sure it can be done by electronic transfer which would/may cover his phone

 

The most important thing about this is the address on the warrant is your previous address which means you did not receive the PCN ,notice to owner ECT

 

you need to get in touch with TEC on Monday and ask them to confirm the address the address on the warrant(this will be your previous address) they will e-mail you the forms for you to fill out (as per tomtubbys post on the link in post 4)

 

Once /if it is accepted (and i see no reason why it wont be) the PCN reverts back to the original fine

 

any overpayment should be recovered from your local authority they are fully responsible for all actions of there bailiffs including there fees

 

Thank you :-) I tried to call them this afternoon but i think they close early on a Friday. So I'll give it another go on Monday.

I was thinking about taking the bailiff to court to reclaim any overpayment, do you think I should stick with then Council for now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Just had a look seems like they have overcharged us by about £700.00 taking into account we never received any paperwork. Even if we had they still overcharged us by £500.00

 

I hate bailiffs with a passion. wish i was there my husband just paid as he was at work and didnt want to cause a scene. :mad2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Just had a look seems like they have overcharged us by about £700.00 taking into account we never received any paperwork. Even if we had they still overcharged us by £500.00

 

I hate bailiffs with a passion. wish i was there my husband just paid as he was at work and didn't want to cause a scene. :mad2:

 

 

the bailiff probably went to your previous address however £800 is taking the xxxx

 

look to recover the money from the council first then you take them and the bailiff/firm to court I don't know much about that side of it (going to court) but there are plenty people who do and they will gladly walk you through the process

 

what bailiff firm is it you are dealing with

did you check to confirm the bailiff is certificated and to the company he is collecting for

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would IGNORE the charges that have been applied as this merely takes away from the real issue which is that the bailiff enforced a warrant when all statutory notices had been sent to a PREVIOUS address.

 

All local authorities know that if they are made aware of a NEW address or if notified that you had not received statutory notices that they MUST NOT enforce the warrant.

 

What you need to do is to file an Out of Time Witness Statement which SHOULD be accepted. It does NOT matter at all that payment has been made. If accepted, this will REVOKE the warrant and you may then make an application to the LOCAL AUTHORITY for a refund. They are the liable party. NOT the bailiff company.

 

Phone the Traffic Enforcement Centre on Monday and ask them to confirm the precise address on the warrant and they will forward a TE7& TE9 for you to complete. When you get this, post back on here and advice can be given to you as to what you need to put on the form. Their number is 08457 045 007

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for replying,

Well we haven't received anything as we moved in July 2010. We didn't inform DVLA so I'm not sure what would have been sent to our previous address.

I believe the warrant address the bailiff had was our previous one.

Apparently the bailiff spotted him whilst he was driving to work and followed him to his office.

I have checked and the bailiff is certified. Can a bailiff use a warrant of execution on private property? as this happened whilst my husband was at work. They have a private Car park with security.

Also can a bailiff charge for each visit? or is it just the statutory charges?

 

Although I think the bailiff fees in your case are excessive, I'm not sure how they (or the council) can be 'at fault' if they could not find you. No doubt because you failed to update the DVLA (by your own admssion) is the reason you never received the NTO and the following correspondence. Who knows, you may have even been able to challenge the original PCN.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Damn.....I wrote a long response and it went missing. Running late so have to be quick.

 

The local authority know that if their bailiff is made aware of a new address that they MUST contact the Traffic Enforcement Centre BEFORE enforcing the warrant to obtain their consent to reissuing the warrant to a new address.

 

However, this consent will ONLY be given if the address changed AFTER the date of the warrant (which in your case, it did NOT).

 

All local authorities were sent the following notice in May this year and you will need to read the last paragraph on page 2 and the further reminder on page 3.

 

http://www.britishparking.co.uk/write/Documents/Library/Execution%20of%20Warrant%20Information%20Note%20f%20doc.pdf

 

 

You can file an Out of Time Application with the Traffic Enforcement Centre. Call them on 08457 045 007 and ask them to confirm the address on the warrant. They will also send you the forms by email. The relevant forms should be the TE7 & TE9. If you need assistance with completing the form, please post back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...