Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Amazon & Small Claims


cdrider
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4413 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Welcome cdrider, Could you explain the situation in a bit more detail.

 

Hi

 

I'm not sure how much details I should put just in case it does go down the small claims route so this may be a bit general/vague.

 

Bought a Kindle in Nov 2010 and was replaced under warranty in April 2011. In Dec 2011 this failed. I know the warranty is from the first purchase.

 

I'm arguing it isn't of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose and hasn't lasted a reasonable amount of time. Their response has been:

 

The European Directive 1999/44/EC allows for a claim to be taken (under certain circumstances) for a period up to two years in accordance with European Law, and up to six years under UK law.

 

This does not imply that an item has a warranty of two years or six years respectively. It merely permits an individual to make a claim under certain circumstances within that time period, e.g. should a fault be proved to have been inherent in the first six months.

 

Amazon provides a 12 month manufacturer’s warranty for this item. We also comply with our obligations as a retailer under the relevant legislation such as the Sales of Goods Act in the UK. Under the Sale of Goods Act, a consumer is granted recourse against a seller of goods if those goods were defective at the time of purchase. This may include, in certain circumstances, repair, refund or replacement but only to the extent that doing so is not disproportionate to the value of the goods, having regard to the use the customer has already had of the goods and the nature of the goods.

 

I do understand the inconvenience caused by this situation. However, assuming your Kindle was inherently defective, we regard a charge of £40 plus shipping as fair to replace an item of this type and value that has been used for 14 months.

 

I have escalated to CEO level and sent recorded delivery letters. They now refuse to discuss further. Consumer Direct have also advised me to do a section 75 with the credit card company which is underway.

 

If that is not successful then I'll have to look at the small claims court. I don't think a customer should have to pay a third of the item value one month out of warranty. Amazon have also confirmed they don't offer repairs and with it being a fairly new bit of kit it's hard to get a 3rd party report. Amazon also refuse to accept it back for diagnostics.

 

Hence I'm looking for a bit of experience with Amazon and small claims. I nkow they have a head office in Luxembourg but they're also on Companies House with a UK address.

 

Hope that clarifies.

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

So - assuming that the offer is for you to pay over one third of the items value, as you are expected to fork for P&P, that suggests that Amazon are stating that the expected life of the Kindle is less than three years. After all, it can only be a fair offer if you have already had more than a third of the use out of it!

 

I find that quite scary, on such an expensive item, it makes me glad I decided against the Kindle (mainly because I object to Amazon deciding what device I can use to read a book that I have bought, at the time).

 

I would be surprised if Amazon were happy for this one to go as far as the small claims court, the Kindle is their big hope for the future, trying to tie as many people as possible into their format... and publicity that the expected lifespan is less than 3 years would not look good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry about other people's experiences, it sounds like you are doing Ok on your own.

 

Write your seven day letter and see what they do. As the last post said, Amazon are not going to want to go to court!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Amazon have offered a replacement device if I withdraw the claim first. This come over as bullying to me as I have no guarantee they will honour their offer. I don't think I should have to withdraw the claim as a condition of them obeying the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
Amazon have offered a replacement device if I withdraw the claim first. This come over as bullying to me as I have no guarantee they will honour their offer. I don't think I should have to withdraw the claim as a condition of them obeying the law.

 

Hi cdrider. I too am having the same problem with Amazon - Kindle purchased August 2010 and now screen frozen. I have asked them to confirm how long they think a Kindle should last (and the screen) and they wont answer me. I have received exactly the same responses. I am livid. I am being fobbed off and have spoken to advisors, supervisors and managers. The higher level wont speak to me, contact only via email and I too received the same blurb. Just checking online to see if I can take them to small claims court and it looks like I will have to take this route. Wasnt aware of section 75, so will also look into that. I have said I would be happy to have it repaired, but they dont do repairs. I am bouncing off the wall at the minute.

 

Did you receive a replacement?

 

Thanks Bluejr77

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...