Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Current account Overdraft withdrawn without any notice ***Resolved With CEO's Office***


Jonnie Reclaim
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4520 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Following online advice from Santander, I visited my local branch today to add my wife to my current account. It had previously been solely in my name and from inception had a £1000 overdraft. We completed some forms and were informed that the account was now in joint names, and my wife would shortly receive a debit card for the account. I specifically asked if my debit card would be valid, or if a new one would be issued. I was told that my card would function as normal, and nothing concerning the account would change.

 

About half an hour later, I tried to use my Santander debit card for a small purchase in a local shop. There should have been £800+ available credit in the account at this point. My card was declined twice. I returned to my branch to find out what was wrong. They were unable to tell me, but could say that no overdraft was now available on my account. They were also unable to contact the Underwriters who would assess if the overdraft could be re-applied to my account !!

 

After several hours of telephone calls to the Santander Call centre and their complaints dept, I was getting nowhere so emailed the CEO of Santander at [email protected]. Some interesting articles in the Guardian and Daily Mail today re. Santander. It appears that Santander are withdrawing overdrafts either with, or without notice, so anyone with a Santander overdraft needs to be aware of their tactics. Branch have promised to phone me tomorrow, so we'll see !!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please keep us informed. This is a breach of their duty to treat customers fairly and to communicate with you fairly.

We can help you with some tough action if it is not resolved

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

My email to [email protected] did the job !

 

I received a phone call from the ceo's office at 10am yesterday promising and explanation and further phone call by 11am which happened. The outcome was that epting a staff member had made an input error (one of several) while adding my wifes details to my account, and had not ticked a box to show that my wife required the same overdraft ! The computer then 'thought' that no o/d was required on the account and so it 'fell off''. When the o/d was re-applied for, the request was forwarded to underwriters who make all lending decisions.

 

One standing order was stopped and then re-presented. The overdraft was re-instated yesterday and the s/o paid. Santander wrote to the creditor informing of their error and accepting responsibilty for any charges.

 

To be fair, once the ceo's office was involved, this matter was dealt with very quickly and efficiently.

 

I must say however, that the service from the Branch staff and call centre was ineffective. They seem to be severely restricted in what they can do, and who they are allowed to contact. The call centre staff refused to allow me to speak to their supervisors and I was told that the underwriters could not be contacted by call centre staff or customers. The complaints manager was also unavailable and was not 'customer facing' and I was blocked at every stage.

 

The contact procedure seems to be dealt with in two stages : Stage one is customer call centre and Stage two is the complaints dept. The operators in both departments both seem to be trained to record problems and provide advice, but cannot actually solve and issues.

 

The other issue is the '0844...' rate phone contact line. If you're on the phone for long periods, this will quickly become expensive.

 

Advice - contact [email protected] for a prompt solution.

 

I got the impression that there are problems within this large organisation and that senior management do really care and are trying to improve things - they do have their work cut out !

 

I was offered £200 compensation and 6 bottles of wine which I duly accepted. Still waiting for my phone bill !!

 

Thanks to all at Cag for your support.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is it Spanish wine?

 

Well done - so where's the party?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...