Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Mackenzie Hall shop direct debt


kerryi27
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4571 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I hope someone can help me with this one.

I received a debt letter from Mckenzie Hall so I checked my credit report as I didnt think it would be me.

 

When I checked I saw that I did indeed owe money and had missed 8 payments to shop direct last year.

 

I looked to see who shop direct was and found that they own , additions, very, littlewoods and isme catalogues among others.

 

Then I realised what it was, when I moved house in Sep last year, I rang Very to confirm I had moved address. I distinctly remembering asking the girl was she able to change the Additions account also rather than me ringing back and she said yes she would change both.

 

I thought that was that and completely forgot about this other account. I rang Very up and the person there explained that I had owed £135.00 before my moving date.

 

The debt Mackenzie hall want me to payis £290.00 ( i presume missed payment fees).

 

I have no problem paying the £135.00 that I originally owed but I am very unhappy about the extra charges.

 

I explained to the person at Very that If I was trying not to pay the debt I wouldnt have changed any of the accounts and am cross that they werent able to work out my new address themselves without having an agency have to find me. My accounts should have been cross referenced as I used the same debit cards to pay also.

 

The advisor told me to email head office at shopdirect.com and they would investigate as I also wondered would they have the call recorded.

 

I have not yet contacted Mackenzie Hall at all.

 

What do you recommend I do and do I have a case here.

 

In all of my credit history, I have never defaulted on any payments.

 

Regards

 

Kerry

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I think the extra £155 has been added by shop direct rather than Muck hall.

 

What I would be doing is writing to shopdirect telling them that you will pay the late amounts but not their charges.

They will threaten all sorts but these charges are unlawful- what can they actually do!

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, Kerry on mistake can cause a lot of problems,

Ok as to MH is this the only letter you have had

from them?

Before paying out £10.00 for a SAR, take up the

suggtestion and contact Shop Direct and ask

for statements of the account, and explain the

address mix up, make sure you keep all e-mails

if you contact them.

If MH contact you then a '' prove it'' letter

from the CAG. Library can be sent.

Hopefully this can be sorted easily.

 

Brig.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think this is something you should be able to resolve fairly easily, but keep it in writing. No real need for confrontation. I’m assuming the account is still with SD and has not been assigned.

 

Make it clear to them that they only changed the details on one account – they should have changed both. Say no more than that. Point out that your other Shop Direct account continues to run perfectly well.

 

State that as they were at fault in failing to change your details, any collection charges must be removed (they’re probably unfair charges anyway), and any adverse credit data must also be removed.

 

Offer to pay only what you do owe, and ask that any credit arrangement previously in place be honoured.

 

Do that and let us know what comes back.

 

Ignore Mackenzie Hall because they are idiots of the highest order, and are also paranoid. To prove it, look at this:

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/2009/01/24/anthrax-alert-at-debt-collectors-caused-by-box-of-doughnuts-86908-21065861/

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ignore Mackenzie Hall because they are idiots of the highest order, and are also paranoid. To prove it, look at this:

 

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/sc...6908-21065861/

 

 

 

 

Funny funny - That is more than paranoia.

 

That's guilt.

 

For them to think that that people would try to get them with laced doughnuts.... they must know they've been up to no good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the early days, some seasoned CAGgers offered to post them a box of do-nuts.

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

never phone a phone drone whilst they are doing the ironing:wink:

 

Ah! The darwin awards. natural selection at its best (or at least removal from the gene pool)

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi ,

 

thanks for your replys , this letter has failure to respond at the top and payment deadline noon, 12th december,

 

should I contact them, it says their have been previous correspondences, I take it this is because they have been sending to wrong address.

Link to post
Share on other sites

These letters are designed to look intimidating. They are not! It is a lame attempt by the lowest DCA in the food chain to scare you into agreeing something you shouldn't

 

Deal with SD and ignore MH

  • Confused 1

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

this letter has failure to respond at the top and payment deadline noon, 12th december, Oooh, you have a payment deadline of noon!! Clearly their computer has been watching too many westerns, clowns.

 

it says their have been previous correspondences, Er no there hasn't, this is a well worn untruth and is so 80's it's boring.....they use this puerile line on all of their petty letters..

 

Ignore, ignore, and ignore some more, you do not have any legal obligation to respond to ANY letter that comes through your door, just as these clowns have absolutely NO LEGAL rights knowledge or training.

Who ever heard of someone getting a job at the Jobcentre? The unemployed are sent there as penance for their sins, not to help them find work!

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...