Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you. Please will you repost your images in one single multipage PDF file – the right way round et cetera.  
    • And just to reiterate – I'm sorry if the message above sounds a bit harsh. We have to get the message out to other people who visit this thread as well. I realise that you are having a difficult time and we will do our best to help you, of course
    • The last photo shows the overflow carpark looking at the block which our room was located. When we got out of the car my partner thought that the building was for staff accommodation.  The unsecured bedroom window opened onto this car park.
    • Also I see that you are doing a lot of this on the telephone – and without any written confirmation. This is a big mistake. You need to start taking this matter seriously and so everything should go in writing. If you have telephone calls then they should normally be recorded. Read our customer services guide. You should make notes about every telephone call and then you should send an email to your telephone correspondence confirming what they have said or what they have agreed. It is important that you keep detailed paper trails here. Of course we may be jumping the gun and maybe big motoring world will step up to the mark – but I'm afraid that they have a lousy reputation has you have seen and so you need to start practising survival techniques and protecting yourself. You say for instance in your letter of rejection that the mechanic told you on the telephone that the gearbox needed replacing. Do you have any other evidence of this conversation? This is going to sound a bit harsh – but other people will be visiting this thread as well for their own purposes. You conducted their research about this company before you bought the vehicle. You now are fully aware that this is a company which can be very difficult to deal with and causes a lot of problems for many of their customers and yet you are still taking a telephone/verbal approach. Do I need to say any more? Also one of the documents you put up is an email exchange but it is not clear who is writing to who or what dates. If you showed this email to somebody in a pub they would be asking lots of questions about who sent the first message, who sent the second message, what dates were they sent et cetera. Please think about this before you post things. Please can you clarify the details of that email exchange. Please will you present the information carefully. We are all volunteers here and we have to rely on you to do the spadework
    • I told the DM that the room was not acceptable because of the reasons already mentioned. He informed me that they were full that night and that they could move me to the room next door (would not solve my problem with the rooms location). Told the DM that I could not stay in the room provided for the night so left no option but to leave. DM did not reply and I walked out.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

gavandcarly & HFC issues, now find i have a CCJ i knew nothing about


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4497 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Do you know what his credit score actually is? If it is less than 400-450, I can't see what difference will be made. What you need to avoid though is them marking it as a partial settlement and then they or someone else comes knocking on your door for the remainder of the balance, defaulting the credit file all over again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ok cool.

 

Hi credit rating is definitely less than 400.

 

Do you think I may as well not pay them anything then unless they accept to remove the default?

 

Surely it is in there best interest to get the money so they will have to end up removing the default....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think if you present it to them along these lines:

 

I'm not scared of you (ie I know the system)

I Know I've screwed up.

You want my money

I want the default removed

If you do that I'll pay X

If you don't, I'll just do the bare minimum in terms of payments.

Make them understand your primary motivation/objective is to clear up the credit file rather than parting with your hard earned otherwise you just can't be bothered with it.

 

(I say "I" but I mean your husband:-))

Link to post
Share on other sites

The advice I see on here is always to maintain some form of payment if your objective is to keep the creditor as onboard as far as possible, even if it is only £1 per month. I would love to hear what they say if you effered them just that lol!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just emailed him stating that I would of accepted his offer for full and final settlement for £558, however due to them having added the default on my husbands credit rating there is not much point as this will now be in place for 6 years, I asked him if there is anyway possible that they could remove the default and he replied with this:

 

Dear XXX

>

> Your solicitor is correct. The default will remain in place for six years

> from the date it was first registered. However it will show with a zero

> balance. HFC is unable to amend this as it is an accurate reflection of

> action that we took on your account. I have however seen credit files where

> customers have added comments to entries and some lenders look upon this

> practise favourably. A good place to start could be:

> consumer.helpservice@uk.experian.com

>

> Once again I hope this proves to be helpful.

>

> Yours sincerely

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that is up to you.

 

I personally would negotiate them down on the final figure and get a rock solid comittment that the matter is concluded - permanently. It is true that you can add notes to your credit file yourself but I doubt there is any note you could add that would change the opinion of an automated credit score.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep me too. I think I might just reply and state that if the default can not be removed then I am only willing to make minimum payments each month as paying lump sums are not going to improve my husbands credit rating due to the default that they have put in place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have replied with this:

 

If the default is unable to be removed then unfortunately I am only prepared to pay minimum payments each month, as there is no incentive of me paying lump sums when my credit rating has already been destroyed by the default you have put in place.

 

I do however invite you to offer me some sort of resolution in order to have the default removed in order for me to resolve the debt I have with your company as soon as possible.

 

If this is not possible please advise of the minimum payments that I should make each month, and please also provide me with the details of the financial ombudsman that you stated I may contact in your previous email.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have replied with this:

 

If the default is unable to be removed then unfortunately I am only prepared to pay minimum payments each month, as there is no incentive of me paying lump sums when my credit rating has already been destroyed by the default you have put in place.

 

I do however invite you to offer me some sort of resolution in order to have the default removed in order for me to resolve the debt I have with your company as soon as possible.

 

 

Perhaps say: I do however invite you at this point or at some point in the future to offer me a considerably better full and final settlement figure as an incentive to close this account

If this is not possible And in the mean time I am able to pay x (I wouldn't invite them to suggest a monthly payment )

please advise of the minimum payments that I should make each month, and please also provide me with the details of the financial ombudsman that you stated I may contact in your previous email.

 

Kind Regards

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont believe there are no charges or ppi

its HFC they ALWAYS dump stuff on.

 

per i'd SAR them before you do ANYTHING

something smells here

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a PPI, wouldn't it be stated on the original credit agreement?

 

There is nothing on there about PPI....

 

The only charges that have been added were £147 for the account being passed to weightmans debt collection, but they have said that they will remove that. And other than that they said they charged interest for everyday that the payments were late.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you should message your contact and rattle their cage a bit. perhaps say that it has just occured to you that you would likie to do a SAR just to see if there are any discrepancies on the account. If they come back at you with an improved offer you can be sure there is an issue with this account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is what they wrote about the interest charged:

 

To further clarify the point about the interest calculation.

 

The interest is calculated daily on the outstanding balance and applied to the account monthly on the same day as the repayment is due.

 

The number of days in calendar month therefore have an impact on the amount of interest debited to your account.

 

You will notice that on the first page of your statement you were making payments on the "due date" but the interest fluctuated

slightly from month to month due to the different number of days between due dates..

 

If however you take the period from March 2008 through to October 2008 when you were making the contractual repayments you will see

the overall trend of the monthly interest is downwards.

For example £12.90 in March compared to £11.30 in October.

 

This is the calculation and assumption that sits behind the original schedule of 48 payments of £21.60.

 

At the point where you were no longer able to make repayments the interest continues to be added and there fore the balance increases.

 

If you look at the interest added on the 1st July 2009 for example it has increased to £12.69.

 

You are correct in observing that there is no interest added to your account after September 2009.

This is because one of the main functions of the default notice is to terminate the agreement following a breach of the original contract.

 

We therefore calculate the total amount due under the agreement in this case £673.14.

If this amount was paid i.e the breach rectified within 21 days we would be obliged to pay you a rebate and this is shown as well.

 

So at this point £568.85 would have settled your account in full.

 

At this point the original repayment schedule is overridden by the default.

HFC terminated the loan agreement on the 8th September 2009 and instructed Weightmans to recover the default balance of £673.14 p.

At this point HFC stopped adding interest to your loan as it has been terminated and from this date,

regardless of how long it takes to repay, we can only demand a maximum of £673.14 p

plus any Court costs that are awarded in HFC's favour.

 

By way of further explanation it may be helpful to look at

 

the period on your statement from March 2010 to August 2011 to gain an idea of the impact that continuing to add interest would have on the balance.

During this period you were paying £5 per month via Gregory Penningtons.

 

If we assume that the average monthly interest for this period of £12.75 the balance would have increased by £7.75 p per month i.e £140 over these eighteen months.

This would mean individuals in similar circumstances would have great difficulty in ever clearing the debt and the Courts would be overburdened with the work of updating balances.

It is therefore important that the balance is crystallised at the point of default.

 

I hope the above is helpful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks KurvaFace,

 

I will wait for their reply tomorrow as I am guessing the guy has gone home now, and I will let him know that I want to do a SAR, and see what he says.....

 

Why do they have to be so difficult, why cant they just remove the default and let me pay off the debt???? What will they loose by removing the default?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is a PPI, wouldn't it be stated on the original credit agreement?

 

There is nothing on there about PPI....

 

The only charges that have been added were £147 for the account being passed to weightmans debt collection, but they have said that they will remove that. And other than that they said they charged interest for everyday that the payments were late.....

 

they cant charge a referal to DCA fee

 

so they are charging interest on late payments, but you were charged interest already on the loan

sso thats a charge too!

 

you really need to nail them and stay off that phone

SAR them.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do DX, havent been on the phone to them as we live in Dubai now. Just been communication via email.

 

Weighsmans is a solicitors I believe they said the charges were for: £55 for issuing the judgment set by the Court, £22 for entering the judgment set by the Court, £70 solicitor's costs awarded by the Court, Total - £147

 

They have however said that that they will remove the £147 if i pay one lump sum of £558.

 

I will do the SAR the only thing is there is no postal system here in Dubai so I cant post it and there is no postal lorders out here so i cant send the £10 postal order. Is there anyway of doing a SAR online?

Link to post
Share on other sites

hang on

so you have a CCJ?

 

and you are overseas?

 

why are you bothering?

 

ever coming home?

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

then what is this all about?

 

Weighsmans is a solicitors I believe they said the charges were for: £55 for issuing the judgment set by the Court, £22 for entering the judgment set by the Court, £70 solicitor's costs awarded by the Court, Total - £147

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...