Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I plan to be honest to avoid any further trouble, tell them that the name should be changed to my official name
    • There is no evidence that I was issued a PCN that was placed on the car and removed. It seems that I was issued a £60 PCN on the 8th of March (the parking date) but it was never placed on my car, instead,  they allege that they posted the PCN on the 13th of March and deemed delivered on the 15th. I never got this 1st £60 PCN demand. I only know about all of this through the SAR. I only received the second PCN demanding £100, which was deemed delivered on 16/04/2024 - that is 39 days after the parking incident.  I did a little research and "Legislation states that postal PCNs must be sent within 28 days, unless otherwise stated in the Regulations." as per London Councils Code of Practice on Civil Parking Enforcement.  The main issue is that I was not aware of the 1st £60 PCN as I didn't receive it - I'm not sure how this relates to the 28-day rule because that rule applies to the initial £60 PCN. PCM could say that "we sent him the letter by post and it was deemed delivered on the 15th of March" therefore the 28-day rule does not apply.  As regards the safety of the parking attendant, that is clearly something he chose to feel and he made the decision that his safety was threatened - I didn't even see him or had any interaction with him. I'm nearly 50 and I definitely don't look aggressive 😊  
    • okay will do. I'll let you know if anything transpires but once again - many thanks
    • Personally I would strongly suggest not risking going there with debts. Very possible you wont get back out again. And I know many in that position. Not jailed just unable to leave. the stories of Interpol in other countries sounds far fetched but in and out of Dubai is not a good idea. only two weeks ago a mate got stopped albeit a govt debt.
    • BTW the time in and out is less than 10 mins, more than 5 in case that's relevant? I saw an article posted on here about a year ago a proposed legislation change but i don't know if that went through or not? I'm also a blue badge holder but there it was a regular parking spot.   Private parking fines to be capped at £50 WWW.BBC.CO.UK Drivers will also need to be given a grace period for lateness, as part of a crackdown on parking firms.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

SPML another EVICTION hearing on Wednesday I need HELP


bs0lth
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4558 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

Ok I have filed a N233 and I think its ok, but I need some help. I have been to the court today and filed everything before it closed, however, I got home to find that my SAR arrived from the mortgage company. What a mess its in, the statements are no where near complete, and everything else is all over the place.

 

Right, In my statement I said that I could not corrilate the arrears. 2 things thats I dont think is right. first the mortgage company just stuck buildings insurance onto my mortgage payments they sent me out letters saying that they needed info from other insurers and I sent that in. what it looks like has happened is that its not seperate, its just lumped in with the mortgage amount, so far I have found £1131 of insurance. now I didn't ask for it, I didn't sign anything for it and I certainly wasnt offered any kind of choice of providers it was just added to my mortgage amount.

 

The second thing is the fees, the statements are not complete however, what is sticking out is legal costs, they add up to a lot of money.. £641 +£245+£200+£197.75+£192 = £1475.75

 

The fees on the account (not including this years) comes in at £3395

 

basically what Im asking is, where do I stand on the insurance, I have two complete years that have been paid, Ive writen to the mortgage company and said that they need to pay it back and officially complained, they wrote back saying they would investigate but it will take 4 weeks...

 

and the legal fees, can they lump them in with the arrears as well.. guess what paid those..

 

can somebody please help me make head and tale of this

 

thanks

 

Lynne

Link to post
Share on other sites

What's the N233 for ? do you mean N244 ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Ell-enn

 

I dont know where my last post went, I filled in the right form honest, Im just so tired at the moment, filed it this morning and this afternoon my SAR stuff came, so have been frantically going through it. There is a lot missing mind you..

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did you put in Q10 of the N244 ? (I'm assuming you took a photocopy of it before handing it into court?)

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 Copies.. I learned well, on for the court, one for me and one for the other side.. :)

 

I am the defendant in this case and respectfully request the court to consider the

Following information when hearing my application:

 

The arrears arose due to the defendant Miss L being unable to work, due to ill health and a long period in hospital (appendix 1)

 

However my situation has improved. I have returned to work, working 8 hours a week on the permitted work scheme operated by the DWP. This means that on top of my wage I will receive full ESA benefits and mortgage relief. My daughter has also asked to return to this address and contribute towards the mortgage, and I have also been asked to have a friend’s daughter live with me for the next 2 years. Please see completed budget sheet (appendix 2)

 

I therefore ask the court to take into account the case of Cheltenham and Gloucester v Norgan when considering my offer of payment and also s.36 of he Administration of Justice Act 1970.

 

I would also like to bring to the Courts attention that I am unable to reconcile the arrears figures given to the Court by SPML. The Claimant pleads that there are no arrears penalty charges or administrative charges included in the arrears. I would like to say that speaking to SPML on the telephone that the charges are in excess of £3000. I have asked on several occasions for this to be put in writing, but they have refused the request. I am still waiting for the results of the Subject Access Request I have sent them (Appendix 3)

 

I would also like to add, that SPML have been adding buildings insurance onto the account when my insurance company keeps informing them that I have independent insurance, and they are listed as interested parties on my insurance. I have made an official complaint to the company and have received a letter back from them. I have included my insurance policy and the letter from SPML (appendix 3). I have currently paid over 3 years insurance to SPML which works out approximately £1800. I am waiting for the exact amount to be confirmed. It has also been added onto the arrears. (Appendix 4)

 

I have applied to the Mortgage Rescue Department of Sunderland Council, They will be contacting SPML to try to work out a solution to try to help with this situation.

 

I assure the Court that I am committed to clearing the arrears and respectfully ask that eviction is suspended in order to avoid the expensive and unnecessary costs which would undoubtedly arise following repossession in the current property climate.

 

I believe the above to be true and factual

Link to post
Share on other sites

I also included a letter from my Consultant, my medical records.. to prove hospitalisation, personal expensies, one for my daughter who will move back in permantly if we can get this sorted, I included my buildings contents insurance with different complanies, just got the info from mortgage company today on thiers, so will have to take that with me..

Link to post
Share on other sites

How many payments have you missed since the last court hearing? How much are the total arrears ?

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Missed 1, but can make that up, but the problem is that the DWP cancelled my ESA then reinstated it and its gone to contribution based not income based so no mortgage relief until they sort it out and back date it.. which they are currently doing. I hadnt realised that it had happened, until today.. got a letter on saturday and only reread it today and found the fault, so they havernt been paying the mortgage relief since september.. so we have been short

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ell-enn

 

I have been back in court today, they have persponed the eviction for another three weeks, basically, but what the judge said was that all of the charges on my account are a matter between me and the mortgage company. I have a question. I am going to try a letter before action to get them back, but my question is this. they are adding legal fees and a litigation management fee.. the legal fees for this month are £300 on top of £115 litagation fees.. can they do that, or do I have to sink the legal fees..

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...