Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Have we seen your court bundle?   If we haven't then it's probably an idea to post it up here especially the index page and the witness statement so we can see if there is anything which might need adding or changing 
    • "Care to briefly tell someone who isn't tech savvy - i.e. me! - how you did this?" Its pretty simple although not obvious. You open the google maps app > click your profile picture > Click Timeline from the list > click today > choose the date you want to see the timeline from. Then you'll see your timeline for that day. Often, places you have visited will have a question mark beside them where google wants you confirm you have actually visited. You either click 'yes' if you have, or you click 'edit' to enter the actual place you visited. Sometimes, you'll see 'Missing visit' This probably happens if your internet connection has dropped out at that time. You simply click 'Add visit' and enter the place. The internet on my crappy phone often loses connection so I have to do that alot.   OK dx, understood mate. 
    • I have now been given a court date vs Evri, 4th Sept 2024. I have completed my court bundle, when am I expected to send copies to the court and Evri and should it be in hard copy or electronic? The Notice of Allocation states that no later than 7 days before the directions hearing both parties must send to the other party their final offers to settle. Does this mean I will have to tell Evri what I'm willing to settle? Rgds, J
    • Sorry  Noted x   Ok how about this to the CEO? I know it sounds super desperate but lets call a spade a spade here, I am super desperate: Dear Sir, On 29th November 2023 I took out a loan of £5000 with you. Unfortunately very early into 2024 I found myself in financial difficulty (unexpected bills and two episodes of sickness and the tax office getting my tax code wrong resulting in less pay for two months) and I contacted you (MCB) on 13th February 2024 asking if there was any way I could extend the length of my loan to 36 months. I fully explained why I was requesting this and asked for your help. I did not receive a reply to that email so I again contacted you on 7th March 2024 to advise you of a change in my circumstances which resulted in me having to take out a DMP and asking you to confirm that the direct debit had been cancelled. You would have also received confirmation of this DMP from StepChange but you did not acknowledge receipt of my email. I have only managed to make one payment from my loan but did try and contact MCB to discuss extending my loan, help etc.  I have now therefore fallen behind on several of my debts, yours included, and as a result you have lodged a Cifas marker against my name for "evasion of payment", which has resulted in me having to change banks, which has been an extremely difficult process because of the Cifas marker. I do not feel you have been fair or given me the opportunity to fully explain my situation to you before you lodged the marker against my name. I appreciate it is a business and you have acted accordingly, but I did try to make contact to arrange alternative arrangements and at no point, not even to this day, did I ever intend to not repay my loan. I cannot stress to you enough how much this has affected my mental health. I am having trouble sleeping and my existing health condition has been exacerbated by all of this. What I would like you to do is to please, please remove the Cifas marker and let me make arrangements to pay the loan back through a DMP.  Please sir, I am begging for your help here. I am not a dishonest person and I have never been in a situation like this before. I am desperately trying to make things right but this marker is killing me. Please can you help me? I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully,
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

ashort v FD (Late response) what to do?


ashort
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6381 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have received all my bank statements and listed all the charges. I now want to send the preliminary letter plus the schedule of charges. Do I include all the charges as represented on the statements? The reason for asking is I have no idea how much manual intervention has taken place and therfore not sure if I should be deducting anything? - Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

If they didn't send any notes regarding manual information with your subject access request, then it is safe to assume that manual intervention has not occurred. Should they change this position at a later stage, then the ace up your sleeve is that you specifically requested the information...

 

As for the charges, yes, everything that appears on your statement that you know is a penalty - plus any interest they have charged you on those penalties.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am about to send off my preliminary letter and schedule of charges but for some reason getting a little nervous.

 

I have literally listed all the charges from 6 years of statements plus debit interest and placed in the spreadsheet. Do I need to deduct anything re manual intervention from the bank. They have listed all the dealings with me but no details on costs they have incurred. Don't want to make a mistake at this early stage.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looking through my notes they sent me, there is no indication of charges relating to manual intervention, if you sent off the template letter requesting details/ statments and they havent supplied that info i would personally hazard a guess they dont have too much arguement with your figures.

Simply put you asked the question they didnt answer sufficiently.

 

Good luck...

I love the smell of banks coughing up refunds early in the morning

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have sent my claim for charges to FD (std letter giving them 14 days to respond) They wrote to me some days later informing me that they were sorry I was complaining and a complaints procedure booklet was enclosed(it wasn't) and that they'd formally respond in 10 working days. The time was up yesterday but still no response. I'm ready to send the 2nd letter giving them another 14 dayts at which point I'll start legal action.....but should I give them more time before sending this 2nd letter??

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

You gave them 14 days in your preliminary letter; if that period is now up, bang in your LBA straight away! Your case, your timetable!

 

Good luck!!

If I've helped, please tick the scales at the bottom left of this message!

 

17th Sept: Found this site! :)

 

Lloyds TSB

 

22 Sept: Subject Access Req.

3 Nov: statements arrived. Charges calulated at:

A/c 1 - £2,178.01 + int of £1,206.54 (18.4% authorised)

A/c 2 - £206.11 + int of £211.07 (18.4%)

7 Nov - prelim.

3 Dec - LBA

13 Dec - £750 offered

23 Dec - £750 credited

28 Dec - rejection letter

2 March - issued

16 April - complained at court failure to forward defence

 

Halifax

 

22nd September: Subject Access Request.

4th November: No reply so LBA giving 7 days.

 

Cap One

 

22nd September: Subject Access Req.

5th October: Letter saying no record of account!

15th October: Replied telling them to try harder...

22nd October: Subject Access Req acknowledged.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No you shouldn't. This is your claim not theirs, you set the timescales. The banks will stall and delay when ever they can. This method gives them adequate time to settle, they just chose not to. Stick to your guns!

Lloyds TSB - £972

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent

Claim acknowledged

Defence received

AQ 20/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 20/07/06***

 

Woolwich - £2288

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent.

Offered half

Moneyclaim filed online 02/08/06

Judgement filed online 23/08/06

WARRANT FILED ONLINE 30/08/06

MONEY RECEIVED BY BALIFF 04/10/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 09/10/06***

 

Smile - £175

Pelim 23/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 07/07/06***

 

My Ex vs Woolwich - £715

S.A.R sent 30/08/06

Pelim 06/10/06

LBA 20/10/06

 

Advice & opinions provided are personal, and not endorsed by CAG or BAG, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have today received a letter from FD offering me over £1200 ( My charges totalled £1900+) although the bank are accepting no liability they claim it would be able to defend it's charges as the tarrifs were set out in the contract I signed when I set up my account etc.....

 

The offer is tempting but wondered if this is the norm and what others have done in such circumstances.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me i would accept the offer on the basis that you will still be claiming the rest.

I think you will find this is the norm going by other people's experience.

The choice is yours at the end of the day though.

I love the smell of banks coughing up refunds first thing in the morning.

 

HSBC, they tried they failed, they coughed up in full

To all the others beware i am heading your way next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Lloyds TSB - £972

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent

Claim acknowledged

Defence received

AQ 20/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 20/07/06***

 

Woolwich - £2288

S.A.R, prelim and LBA sent.

Offered half

Moneyclaim filed online 02/08/06

Judgement filed online 23/08/06

WARRANT FILED ONLINE 30/08/06

MONEY RECEIVED BY BALIFF 04/10/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 09/10/06***

 

Smile - £175

Pelim 23/06/06

***FULL SETTLEMENT RECEIVED 07/07/06***

 

My Ex vs Woolwich - £715

S.A.R sent 30/08/06

Pelim 06/10/06

LBA 20/10/06

 

Advice & opinions provided are personal, and not endorsed by CAG or BAG, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In the letter I received offering me a partial payment, the guy stated that if I didn't accept it and I wanted to escalate my concerns I should write to a Robert Kernaghan. The letter I am sending (see below and thank you closey) is going back to the one who made me the offer but asking him to pass it to Robert should he wish to do so. Is that ok? Plus as they hadn't responded in time to my first LBA letter I sent my second after the 14 day deadline - then the partial offer arrived (their letter was dated 20/9 but arrived on the 27th) Is it ok to give them a deadline of 16/10 (14 days from my 2nd LBA letter) or should it be a further 14 days from my rejection letter date. Really sorry if I'm going on a bit but don't want to mess anything up.

 

Response to settlement offer.

 

Dear Mr Ruane,

Thank you for your letter dated 20 September 2006.

We respectfully decline your offer of settlement and request, once again, that you return to us all charges imposed on this account, totalling £1902.75

We will accept the sum offered (£1223.00) only as part settlement and on the clear understanding that we will pursue recovery of the remainder, with a County Court claim if necessary.

 

Our letter before action sent on the 26th September indicates that you have until 16/10/2006 to respond before Court action commences. You are reminded that there will be no extension to this timescale.

 

We trust this clarifies our position.

Should you wish to pass our letter to Robert Kernaghan, Customer Relations Manager, please do so.

 

The help so far recieved has been brilliant but just feeling a little stressed as the process moves on

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I wrote to FD accepting a partial offer of £1223 (I requested £1902.75), but informed them that I would pursue them for the remainder through the courts if necessary. I actually gave them 14 working days to respond (expired yesterday). Nothing in the post today so I have no option to use MCOL.

 

I do however have a couple of questions:

 

(1) Is there a time limit on me filing a claim? I warned the bank that this would happen if they did not respond by the 16th (I don't currently have the £120 court fee available - shld have in about a week though)

(2) I have been sending all my correspondence to First Direct in Leeds. It does however sugggest on the site that the court letter should be addressed to the bank's Head Office - I can't find one for FD. Should it go to Leeds or HSBC HO in London?

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I wrote to FD accepting a partial offer of £1223 (I requested £1902.75), but informed them that I would pursue them for the remainder through the courts if necessary. I actually gave them 14 working days to respond (expired yesterday). Nothing in the post today so I have no option to use MCOL.

 

I do however have a couple of questions:

 

(1) Is there a time limit on me filing a claim? I warned the bank that this would happen if they did not respond by the 16th (I don't currently have the £120 court fee available - shld have in about a week though)

 

(2) I have been sending all my correspondence to First Direct in Leeds. It does however sugggest on the site that the court letter should be addressed to the bank's Head Office - I can't find one for FD. Should it go to Leeds or HSBC HO in London?

 

Thanks

 

You are ok to wait for a week. i would send it to where you have sent your other letters they will forward it if ness.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I have filed my claim via MCOL and having checked the MCOL website the bank have acknowledged my claim. I have followed every bit of advice from the site so far but what I haven't done is sent the bank my revised schedule of charges (8% interest + court costs) since filing my claim. Should I send them this or wait for the bank to request it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a response from FD stating that they intend to defend my claim in full. Although I knew this may happen and will go the whole way if needs be I was wondering whether anyone could tell me if this is the norm?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just received a response from FD stating that they intend to defend my claim in full. Although I knew this may happen and will go the whole way if needs be I was wondering whether anyone could tell me if this is the norm?

 

Absolutely it's the norm. Usually, if you feel intimidated by what the bank say, then yes, it's normal. That is, in fact, their aim. At this stage, why don't you give us the full details so that we can give you some assistance when the time comes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Assuming you sent the schedule (excluding 8% interest) with your initial claim and with your LBA, you don't neeed to send the revised schedule including your interest. If it goes to court (which it won't) you can send one to the court later. They know you can add interest once it gets to the MCOL stage and they also know about court fees.

 

Expect a letter from DG Solicitors soon.

Matt

 

First Direct: £6639.77 settled in full

MBNA Visa:

Co-Op Visa:

Capital One Visa:

M&S Financial Services:

IKANO Financial Services:

 

"All the truly great men are dead - and I'm not feeling too well myself."

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stonelaughter,

Thanks for your swift response. Details so far:

30/6/06 - S.A.R sent (plus £10 - later returned)

4/9/06 - Req for repayment letter + schedule of charges (£1859 + £43.75 O/D charges totalling £1903.75)

20/9/06 (letter dated by bank but not received until 27/9) - Bank offered £1223.00 (without prejudice)

29/9/06 Letter sent accepting this offer as part payment. I gave them 14 working days to respond i.e until 16/10/06. They didn't respond.

18/10/06 - MCOL claim made including court costs + 8% interest now totalling £2491.84. Court issued claim on 19th (gave 24th as official claim date).

25/10/06 - letter received from court stating that defendent wishes to defend the claim (FD's solicitors in Birmingham)

That's where I'm at.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Obviously the way threads work has confused me. Prior to using this site I had never used them before. (I may still have one more outstanding somewhere) - Really sorry!

 

While I'm logged on thought I'd give a brief update. On Saturday DG solicitors offered me the full amount of 1902.75 which is the amount I originally asked for before having to use MCOL. Obviously this now doesn't cover my court costs or interest and I feel rather cheated but don't want to sound greedy either. I have been advised to ask for the full amount which is just under £2500 which I intend doing tomorrow, although I wouldn't mind some reassurances that this is definitely the way to go. The bank's 28 days are up on 21/11.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...