Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

ET struck my claim out without any notice


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4646 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

I hope some one can give me a little advice on this.

I have been conducting a tribunal and because i was not well i sent a request to ask for an extension, they did not get this and on the friday before the pre hearing review the following monday i received a phone call from the tribunal saying that the judge had struck my case out and i shouldnt attend the hearing on the monday.

 

I was not happy about this and i told them i wanted to appeal straight away over the phone.

I wrote them an email the same friday saying i wanted to appeal against the strike out.

 

I didnt hear anything for 2 weeks so i rung them and they said that they had emailed me ( but sent it to a wrong email address)

And the contents of that email was that a judge had seen my letter and has said that if i comply with the last order then they will think about proceeding with my case?

 

I said i was ill and that i needed time. so 2 weeks later i recieve another letter saying that my letter had been sent to the respondents for their comments on the matter and they had 7 days to reply, no reply as yet.

As always i always CC the respondents as to CPR.

 

The tribunal havent even acknowledged that;

A. i appealed.

B. i was not happy with the tribunal failing to follow its own procedures.

 

Can anyone give advice please as the tribunal are being run by the people i am against!

and that there is a massive conflict of interest.

 

Thanks A.

Link to post
Share on other sites

*bump*

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin with due respect the member only posted this just before midnight.

Active members are restricted at this time as you can well appreciate actionblusox

I will flag this up in the site team forums.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I dont see how you can appeal against the ET`s decision to the ET, you can ask for a review and then appeal to the EAT.[appeals tribunal]

 

I suggest that you write to the Et [again]giving them your reasons for a review, include either a doctors note or a letter from your doctor confirming that you were ill on the day of the hearing in question. also remind the ET that you are an unrepresented claimant.

 

Do not send them an email as it could again go astray.

 

You must also copy this letter to the respondents.

 

Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

Martin with due respect the member only posted this just before midnight.

Active members are restricted at this time as you can well appreciate actionblusox

I will flag this up in the site team forums.

 

Apologies Martin, didnt realise the time and misread it as being from a day earlier, my bad.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

when i was phoned and told my case was struck out prematurely the lady said i could appeal. I did this in writing and by email the same day with an email receipt from them confirming their receipt.

when eventually i received a reply they stated that if i complied then they will allow my case!

They never mentioned anything about the appeal that i had put in they seemed to ignore that and my questions also about not following procedures etc and basically are treating me like **** because i am not represented, its all of them against me.

I had sent them a letter from my doctor confirming that i wasnt in a fit state healthwise to conduct my case at that time due to all of the stress also, i even backed it up citing cases of cases being stayed temporary for health reasons.

Yes i always cc/copy the respondents in.

 

can they throw a case out without contacting you in writing? and then ignore an appeal and reinstate the case if they want to without following procedures?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

Well i have found out that the legal people defending my employers also do government outsourced work for the dept of justice and that they do the DoJ and tribunal payroll!

So they virtually run the DoJ and tribunal service??

doesnt that amount to a conflict of interest? because like i have said it seems like i am fighting against my employers as well as the tribunal who are clearly biased and block any attempt i make for disclosures or anything and seem to want to throw my case out at the first excuse.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...