Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fos


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4630 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am having a complaint investigated by the Financial Ombudsman in regards to PPI on the basis that Barclays FirstPlus did not refund the full amount paid out. As a result of letters to BFP and then subsequently to FOS from me asking for full breakdown of the amounts I have paid against capital, PPI and Interest, BFP have ignored my requests to supply and are now ignoring FOS requests to supply. FOS say they cannot force BFP to supply this info. Why not? Information that BFP have supplied to FOS was only supplied on the agreement that FOS dont show it to me. WHo are FOS working for?

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you have your agreement and statements showing the repayments, it is possible to work out what you should be getting back. An option then would be to tell fos what you should be paid or alternatively sue for it.

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi kibris,

look who pays their wages, say no more.

:p[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

totiesquoties

 

MY ADVICE IS BASED ON COMMON SENSE AND KNOWLEDGE FROM PERSONAL EXPERIENCE, I AM NOT LEGALLY TRAINED, AND ALWAYS CHECK LEGAL ISSUES EITHER WITH A LEGAL PERSON, OR

THE APPROPRIATE LEGISLATION. :rolleyes:

IF I HAVE HELPED, PLEASE PRESS MY STAR, THANK YOU.:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

FOS say they cannot force BFP to supply this info. Why not? Information that BFP have supplied to FOS was only supplied on the agreement that FOS dont show it to me. WHo are FOS working for?

 

Hello Kibris

 

If your complaint is still being assessed by an Adjudicator or been passed to an Ombudsman for a final decision, remind them of their statutory powers to request information.

 

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2000/8/section/231

 

231 Ombudsman’s power to require information.

(1)An ombudsman may, by notice in writing given to a party to a complaint, require that party—

(a)to provide specified information or information of a specified description; or

(b)to produce specified documents or documents of a specified description.

 

(2)The information or documents must be provided or produced—

(a)before the end of such reasonable period as may be specified; and

(b)in the case of information, in such manner or form as may be specified.

 

Regards

 

Ian

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Thanks for all your responses. Firstly Barclays FirstPlus (BFP) sent a summary of what they were going to refund as part of the PPI and what they were going to credit to the account. On the summary there is an interest amount that i paid during the term of the PPI that i believe should be repaid back, this is where i have asked for transparancy in the figures on the summary (a breakdown of my payments against capital, PPI, PPI interest and capital interest), which i wouldn't have thought was difficult based on the fact that there is a summary. This is the info BFP refuse to supply.

 

Secondly BFP have changed the way they handle my account and the way they add interest, without informing me that they were doing so.(this was in 2007 and i found out last month). The information asked for above will show what they have done and whether i am in a better or worse position because of it.

 

I probably couldn't sue as i couldn't match the costly legal that they can.

 

All i have is the ombudsman.

 

Thanks Ian for that legislation and I will be writing to the FOS with the quotation by return.

 

Kibris

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I mentioned earlier, do you have the agreement and the statements for the account?

 

If so I am happy to calculate what you should be getting back. Once you know that you can avoid the confusion that reigns at the moment and go straight for your money back.

 

Regards

 

ims

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...