Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Fredrickson/ TXTloan harrassment for money not owed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4749 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Being bombarded with calls from Fredrickson's followed by receiving a letter saying I owed £247 to TXT Loan Limited, I assumed it must be some kind of 'problem':roll: as I have never taken out any such loan or heard of either company. Googling it enhanced my suspicions as I found Fredrickson's had a habit of attempting to squeeze money out of people who did not owe it.

 

I wrote to them asking them for a copy of the CCA and clearly stated that this was not my debt and that all correspondence on the matter was to be in writing.

 

They replied that they had referred the matter to their client and were putting the account on hold in the meantime. The phonecalls ceased for about three weeks but have now recommenced. Last week I received a copy of the credit agreement with an unsigned 'click to sign' box and completely the wrong DOB, but used my correct initial and address. It also contained a bank sort code and account number, also not mine. The date this loan was taken out co-incides with the time my credit card company alerted me that my credit card details were being used fraudulently.

 

If TXTloan had this address, why would they never write to me? Checks on personal details such as name and date of birth are so easy now-a-days any fraudster can access them far too easily with a few clicks on the Internet, along with mother's maiden names. This being so easily accessible makes it seem absurd that banks still use these details as adequate security checks. But in this instance a quick check by any of them should have shown this.

 

Interestingly garyjc is having an IDENTICAL experience to myself!

 

I have reported it to the police and written to TXTloan explaining the situation.

 

Now Fredrickson have started the telephone harassment again (it is my poor father that has to endure the brunt of these) what should my next step be?

 

I'm sure there are plenty others out there with similar experiences and would love to hear any with such similar circumstances. If payday loans companies can give out money to fraudsters who need no more than someone else's name and address, then surely there must or will be loads of such cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You must inform Freds that you will correspond only in

writing for a start.

Also include the phrase I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TOU YOU OR THE COMPANY

YOU CLAIM TO REPRESENT.

Basically it is up to them to prove that you owe the debt,, not for you to prove you don't.

Tell your father just to say only in writing and hang up.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again Brigadier2JCS, thought I should start my own thread for advice on what to do now that the telephone harassmnent has started up again while awaiting TXTloan's response! You think I should write again to them telling them all this for a second time?

 

I have told my father not to answer and not to seak to them. They say who they are in a recorded message. Both of my parents have been defrauded many times in various scams. They are consequently on what I believe is termed 'the suckers list' and targeted on a daily basis despite my efforts to stop it and advising them to trust no-one. I assumed this was a [problem] too.

 

Is there no regulation stating that an alleged debtor should be contacted in writing before selling the alleged debt to a DCA? And for a DCA to not continue to telephone when a formal request has been made for all correspondance to be in writing and the DCA has put the account on hold? Also, with the date of birth and account details being in-correct on an unsigned credit agreement, surely it cannot still be valid?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brain Carter solicitors!! will start court proceedings at the drop of a hat, he uses

the court system to threaten.

As to the rest of your post I find it a bit confusing

Please give us some more details and the guys will be able to advise.

Any Letters I Draft are N0T approved by CAG and no personal liability is accepted.

Please Consider making a donation to keep this site running!

Nemo Mortalium Omnibus Horis Sapit: Animo et Fide:

Link to post
Share on other sites

More telephone harassment despite them receiving letter stating I wished all correspondence to be in writing and today received a LETTER BEFORE ACTION from Fredrickson. What letter to send now? I will certainly be going back to the police who asked me to let them know if Fred gave me any more trouble.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...