Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi. I am reading through the full thread and will continue to research. I have come across a reference to a form called N180 DQ in the thread, but I cannot see any reference to this form in my case nor can I see it on the MoneyClaim website. Should I have been sent this form? Thanks 
    • 12mph (beyond any UK limit) will certainly qualify for a Fixed Penalty. So you should received an offer of a FP for each of the remaining two offences. Be sure to submit your licence details as instructed when you accept the offer. If you don't your £100 will be returned to you and the police will prosecute you in court.
    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Equita Bailiff fee`s- they say they came round but have shown no proof


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4769 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, i had a letter from Equita Bailiffs sent to my address on the 12/05/2011 saying bailiffs would attend and the letter was a REMOVAL NOTICE. i contacted Equita on the 16/05/2011 to make arrngements to pay the fine which was for a Parking charge i had parked on double yellow lines. Northampton County Court had instructed Bailiffs to collect the debt.

 

They told me the fine was £123 and i could pay in 2 installments or in 1. I made arrangements to get some money together and pay. But when i phoned back the next day i was told it had been passed on to the Bailliff and i had to contact him. I left a message on the Bailliffs answer machine to ring me back but he didnt untill 20/05/201I. He told me the Debt was £356.24p and had gone up.

 

I was like how?

 

He didnt have his paperwork at hand and was just mking excuses saying i had to pay all at once and that no way could i pay in installments. With threats to visit etc and we will take your car.

 

I phoned him back the next day and told me there was a charge of £150 for Enforcement officer fee`s or summat like that. And a Charge of visiting the property. But no one ever came.

He said we drove past and were looking for your car and couldnt find it. I stated that nothing was put thru the letter box to say that they had been or any knock on the door.

He said we just drove past to see if your car was there. as told by there call centre this is called a "scouting visit"

 

Can i get charged for this? I told him i had CCTV and that they hadnt been and he went well we did but not to your door or your drive. Havent got CCTV really was trying to see what he would say.

 

I contacted the council and arranged to pay them in installements and that they would pass on the money to the Bailliffs. I`ve paid £200 but the charges i think arent real and i think im being ripped off.

 

Here`s the fee`s i got charged for on letter from Equita Bailiffs. :

 

Debt - £110

Initial Letter - £11.20

Visit Fee`s : £44

Attendance Charges : £150

V.A.T - £44.04

 

Total £356.04

 

Now how can trhey charge me Visit fee`s for just driving past?

Attendance charges but did they attend NO.

Was told by the Bailliff that £150 was Bailliff Enforcement Fee`s,then was told it was for the ANPR vehicle.

 

Anyone help please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cant see how they can charge for a visit they didnt make.

 

I am sure someone will be able to advise for sure.

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm in a very similar situation.

 

Had a visit from a bailiff who posted a letter informing me that I had 24 hours to contact him or he would re-attend to impound vehicle/remove goods.

 

This is for PCN. The total charge is £93.44 including the statutory fees of £11.20.

 

When I called the bailiff he informed me that I had to pay £320. When I asked how he'd arrived at that figure and, how that was broken down he simply said "bailiff charges" and wouldn't elaborate.

 

How can they possibly take £230 for the 1st visit? Is this right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...