Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

PCN and Clamping Port Isaac Foreshore


Guest Martiens Bekker
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4780 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Guest Martiens Bekker

Hi there!

I'm looking for the Guru's on parking issues!

The foreshore parking had been closed in the Port Isaac harbor last year unless you own a permit - bought for a ridiculous £120.

Nevertheless I've got fined by the AS Parking Company employed to enforce the permit-only parking rule.

After examining their PCN I found that this in itself contravened law passed in 2007 by the House of Lords.

I actually wrote to them and made them aware of the fact that their PCN format is illegal, but only got a very unprofessional and childish reply.

They stated that I trespassed on private property and I wrote back asking who they then work for,

hoping to get a cheaper permit and I wanted to complain about the condition of the parking lot for which I will have to pay!

They refused to give any info and told me to go and park somewhere else if I do not like the condition of the parking lot.

I kept on parking on the beach as a form of 'protest' and because their are no loading area in Port Isaac for business owners, never mind disabled people!

I've collected a couple of these PCN's now and finally got a letter shining some light on my problem - ownership.

I got a letter without any reference number and no name to the signature,

using what I assume is the letter head of the Port Isaac Harbor Commission.

The address is 8 Fore Street Camelford and when I called the number I found it to be the Sproull solicitor’s office.

It is not friendly letter and I accused of being 'above the law' and I've now been warned that the AS Parking Cowboy-squad

had been given orders to clamp my wheels and that they'll apply for a court injunction if I do not stop my behavior.

They did their homework putting up signs concerning the permits and the fees related to clamping,

which is required when clamping is done on private land.

I just can't understand how the Foreshore could be private land?

I also do not want to back off now!

A solicitor's office who is acting on behalf of the Harbor Commission and who also happens to sell the permits

and who uses a cowboy-company to enforce the 'law' using an illegal PCN format...,

something stinks and it's not the dead fish and seaweed in their parking lot!

 

What I would like to know is;

How can permits be sold for parking below the high-water mark when clearly there is no parking at high tide,

no demarcated parking bays and the lot itself not being cleaned up?

Why is there no access control and why can the public be allowed to play, walk, and sunbathe in a parking lot?

Should there not be some sort of access control and warning signs in place warning the public that this is a privately owned parking lot?

Oh yes, the un-named spokes person of the harbor Commission suggested that my behavior is 'ant-social',

which makes me think that one can only be social if you own a permit :-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

nothing they can do to you

 

it is a speculative invoice - end of!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will probably find that it is owned by;

 

The Duchy of Cornwall

10 Buckingham Gate

London

SW1E 6LA

 

telephone: 020 7834 7346

 

The Crown Estate owns over half of the foreshore around the UK coastline, although much of this is leased to third parties such as local authorities and Natural England.

 

The remainder is owned by bodies such as the Duchies of Lancaster and Cornwall, local authorities, port authorities, statutory bodies, government departments and the following distinctive examples:

The Church Commissioners in Durham

 

The Duke of Beaufort in the Severn Estuary

 

The Beaulieu Estate on the River Beaulieu.

 

The Crown Estate does not generally own the foreshore around the coastline of Cornwall, Sutherland and the Shetland Isles.

Link to post
Share on other sites

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I recall paying £1 or £2 to park on the shingle/sand below the slipway 3 or so years ago - with signs advising when the tide came in! I thought the money was going to the local Parish or Village.

 

As far as clamping is concerned, my uninformed understanding is that clampers must not cause damage - only apply the clamp.

 

Does it therefore follow that if the clamp is not released before the tide comes in, damage to the vehicle could result and become a claim against the clamper and/or their principal (employer)?

 

If so, I think they will be wise enough never to clamp!

 

Therefore the only risk to you is the "PCN" which seems to be speculative invoices - for which the constant advice on these threads is IGNORE and do not respond.

Edited by Tony P
Link to post
Share on other sites

Does it therefore follow that if the clamp is not released before the tide comes in, damage to the vehicle could result and become a claim against the clamper and/or their principal (employer)?

 

Yes, but you would be have to with your car and they would have to refuse to come and unclamp it immediately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...