Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Agreeing a Suspended Possession Order before the Hearing


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5601 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there,

 

Make sure you arrive at court in plenty of time - you can ask the court usher if he/she can put your statement in front of the judge before the hearing. Don't worry if they can't you can give it to the judge yourself at the hearing.

 

The hearing will be held in a private room with just yourselves, the judge and a representative for the other side. You will sit around a table, or in front with the judge on the opposite side. As it is the lender's claim the judge will speak to them first, then come to you. If you haven't been able to get your statement in before the hearing you should say "Sir(or madam) may I give you this statement with our proposal for payment of the arrears. The judge will guide you through the process and you will find that he/she will be aware of your nervousness and make allowances. Speak slowly and clearly and take your time, he/she will understand. The whole process will only take around 5 minutes and you will soon be outside knowing your home is safe.

 

Stay positive:)

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

Just to say hope it all goes ok tomorrow. Sounds like it will be fairly straight forward and with help from Ell-enn you are well prepared. So just remember we will be thinking of you as we understand it can be a bit daunting. But I am sure it will not be as bad as you think.

 

jan

Please note I am not an expert - I am not offering opinions or legal help - Please use all the information provided on the site in FAQ- step by step instructions and library- thanks Jansus:)

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif

offer from A&L 24/8/07 - after case stayed

 

"What makes the desert beautiful is that somewhere it hides a well." - Antione de Saint Exupery

 

 

PROUD TO BE AN ORANGE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I had the hearing yesterday.

 

Its weird as I have years of experience in reasonably tough negotiations with pretty hard bitten business people.

I have gotten pretty used to this and never really get daunted anymore.

 

However, the lead up to the hearing and sitting in the waiting room was very daunting and nerve wracking.

 

The lady from the solicitors found me and we had a brief chat about the hearing. She seemed genuinly pleased that a suspended possesion had been previosuly agreed.

She went through what this meant.....clearly, i had already been briefed.

 

After about a 45 minute wait, we were called in. The judge was very friendly and after being explained by the solicitor the situation asked me if i understood? He then asked me if i could afford this.

 

He went through the implications and the whole experience in the room seemed to be leaning towards my well being.

He rubber stamped it and wished me well.

 

I was in the room no more than 5 minutes.

 

I obviously have to keep up the payments now but felt a huge wait lifted from me.

 

At the court it was clear to me that many people are in this situation and my gut feeling was most of them were not as prepared as me and were not aware about the help offered on this site.

 

I was, and can only thank Ell-enn for the help and advice offered here.

 

I do hope that this thread is of some help to people.

 

Thank you all

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, great news - (I knew you'd be OK).

Well done for being brave :)

 

I hope everything works out OK for you now.

 

Ell-enn

Help us to keep on helping

Please consider making a donation, however small, if you have benefited from advice on the forums

 

 

This site is run solely on donations

 

My advice is based on my opinion and experience only. It is not to be taken as legal advice - if you are unsure you should seek professional help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...