Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi there,  Long story short, I was working a year ago in a city centre and the site operator I was working with told me I could park in a private car park as they had an arrangement with the owner. I came back to a parking fine from UK Parking Control, and the site operator subsequently couldn't get hold of the private car park owner and haven't been able to since. Fast forward to today, I have received multiple legal threats from DCB Legal acting for UK Parking Control and I have now been issued with a court hearing along with a date. I have to file my witness statement for a court hearing later this summer.  I realise that I could have handled the situation better and am already aware of that. I was wondering what my options are at this stage? I am very keen to avoid a CCJ as it would obviously be disastrous for my credit score. Any advice appreciated. My current plan is to file a witness statement and hope the case is discontinued. Thank you for any advice in advance.
    • I run a small retail business selling cards & gifts ( all my sales are done on a face - face basis  ) & noticed one of the settlement amounts on the card terminal bank deposits was short so contacted the card company which said a customer has requested a chargeback on a sale the reason saying the goods bought was not fit for the purpose purchased for. I have old fashion till which does not show any sales or descriptions of what is bought, plus when the settlement statements match up i shred the sale receipts. The card company told me the transaction was paid for with the customers phone & shows on my portal. They have asked me for sales prof, cctv, terminal receipt of the transaction which I have none, as this was done a few weeks later. I have asked for pictures to prove the items are not fit for the purpose purchased for plus said if the customer can return them i would give them a full refund but have had nothing back plus no pictures. Also I have had no communication with the customer even asking me for a full refund. They have now closed the case & awarded the customer the full refund. Any advice would much be appreciated   
    • First Direct has relaunched its £175 switching deal just two weeks after its last switching deal ended due to demand from customers.View the full article
    • The funding being given to Wayve represents the biggest ever investment in a European AI firm.View the full article
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Moneyclaim issued against Experian


compsoz
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6444 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

It sounds like you have been doing this for some time but just in case this is the letter I sent to Birmingham Midshires http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/24013-defaults-proposed-method-removal.html

 

 

And this is the letter received by Surlybonds from Experian in case you have not seen it http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/legalities/30662-scanned-copy-experian-letter.html

 

Having not read all your posts I'm not sure where you are up to so sorry if I have duplicated.

 

Lizzy

 

Halifax

Sent LBA
27/6/06

Been on hol for a week, got home found letter from them dated
27/6/06 offer of £92 claiming £1155.10 so no deal.

Filed claim with Moneyclaim 12/07/06

Halifax acknowledged claim 25/7/06

Court papers received 28/7/06 Halifax intend to defend.

HALIFAX SETTLED IN FULL 1/8/06

Donation made

Birmingham Midshire (mortgage charges) Prelim letter sent 2nd Aug 2006, full offer received 11th Aug with conditions.

13th Aug accepted offer unconditionally.

BIRMINGHAM MIDSHIRES (MORTGAGE) SETTLED IN FULL 24/8/06

Sent SurlyBonds template letter to get defaults removed to Birmingham Midshires 27/08/06

DEFAULTS REMOVED 5/09/06.
THATS 9 DAYS LATER, YES 9 DAYS

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to disappoint you but Moneyclaim only deal with claims for money (as the name suggests). You should have used an N1 and filed it at your local court.

 

Incidentally, I'm not sure how you could have managed to fit your Particulars of Claim for this into the restrictive space on Moneyclaim.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have sent numerous letters to MBNA and complained to the ICO (spoke to them today , said it could take 3mths for reply

 

I got sick of running around

 

Thought that if I got straight to the point and forced them into action I would have concrete progress..

Link to post
Share on other sites

You state

 

I issued a moneyclaim against Experian for holding innacurate default data

 

So it is not a claim for money.

 

If you look at the Moneyclaim site you will see what you can and can't use it for:

 

You cannot use Money Claim Online if your claim is not for a fixed amount. For example if you have suffered an injury and want to claim compensation from the defendant.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court procedures should be the same for moneyclaim as per local court..

 

For instance if your claim is for say £50 expenses incurred and also

 

remove default... and moneyclaim accepts the claim as deemed served then they must act on all issues of the claim...

 

Either that or would have advised me to "do it another way"

 

Surely they can't just ignore some particulars of the claim

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still, any claim involving the DAP is complex by nature. Not sure how you fitted the particulars of claim into 1000 characters.

 

Also, I think it is ultimately up to the judge to decide whether a claim has been filed correctly.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well it says quite clearly on the site that it is for claims of a monetary nature only. If you don't believe me then ring the Moneyclaim helpline in the morning and they will confirm.

 

Moneyclaim is not intended to replace the courts, it is a way of raising relatively simple money claims.

 

Also, for info - if you look round the forums you will see that there have been cases issued on Moneyclaim for bank charges where they have also asked for default removal and the banks have settled the monetary amount but not removed the default, and the judge has ordered that if the amount specified has been paid there is no case to be heard.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

See how it goes.

 

Good Luck though.

Smile:-The Ethical Bank:- Settled July 2006

HSBC:- Pre-lim sent 09/10/2006

LBA sent:-26/10/2006

Court papers issued:- 13/11/2006

Citifinancial/DLC:- Ongoing since 21st August. Now part of an OFT investigation into Debt Collection Practices.

I am only a Doctor of Love NOT Law. Don't blame me if me advice goes belly up!

:D (I will try to help all the same)

 

If i've helped, use the scales at the top to tell me how great I am!

Link to post
Share on other sites

There was one in particular earlier this week but I don't recall the users name, I read hundreds of posts. I will try searching and let you know if I find an example.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Experian will try to get out of this one by saying it was the supplying parties fault. i had an issue where a default would not be removed by a company even though i had concrete evidence to say it shouldn't be there. i went to experian and equifax and told them to do an investigation. They said that every month, all the information they hold is updated by the supplying company so they were not responsible for any mistakes. i had a hell of a time with Sh#troen finance who were the supplying company. finally i got it removed from the CRA's files by proving to the CRA's that this company had absolutely terrible information management systems and the data they had on me was completely wrong. i'm currently in the process of taking sh#troen to court on a number of issues all rolled into one and i'm looking for 4g's back. even though the default still stands on sh#troen records, it doesn't show anywhere else.

 

good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK try this one. In this case the default had actually been removed anyway, but if you see in particular posts #42 and #51 you will see what I mean.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/halifax-bank/28450-advice-needed-judge-says.html#post221152

 

The best advice I can give is to contact Moneyclaim in the morning and see what they say - they may let you withdraw your claim and get a refund, and then you can file an N1. But if you do this please post your particulars of claim on here first as if you managed to fit them in the space provided on Moneyclaim then I doubt they are as in-depth as they need to be.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The MOL claim against MBNA went as follows

 

On 9 seperate occasions I have requested information related to a default registered by MBNA with Credit Reference Agencies. These requests are required to be acted upon in legislation within the Data Protection Act 1998 within 40 days of the request. The date of the final request was June 04th 2006. MBNA again have failed to respond by the legal deadline. I request an order requiring compliance with those provisionsand claim compensation of £50 in relation to the effort put into these requests so far. The information I have requested from MBNA are,,,

A true signed copy of the original account opening form.

A true signed copy of the alledged Default Notice that should have been sent to me at the time. I leave any possible award of compensation for a breach of the Data Protection Act in the hands of the court. I belive the limit for compensation for this criminal offence to be £5000

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI barracad Thanks for the link...

I'm not so sure that only money can be claimed....I may be proved wrong..If so then "Yes you were right" in advance .

 

I just looked at MOL website... and this is a copy of the text

icon_dot.gif Individuals

icon_dot.gif Solicitors

icon_dot.gif Government Departments

icon_dot.gif Businesses

 

who wish to issue a:

spacer.gif

Claim (fixed amount of money)

Judgment

Warrant

 

 

I want a Judgement that compels MBNA to supply my information..

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it's not a monetary claim surely it should be a Part 8 form, not an N1?

 

In this case, yes you are probably right.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI barracad Thanks for the link...

I'm not so sure that only money can be claimed....I may be proved wrong..If so then "Yes you were right" in advance .

 

I strongly urge you to ring Moneyclaim in the morning for clarification.

 

ATEOTD they are the experts and can give a definitive answer.

 

Please let us know what they say so we know for future reference.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What did they advise you to do? Can you withdraw the claim and get a refund?

 

If you do this you can then submit a claim at your local court.

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They said that I couldn't have a refund and as Moneyclaim is only for monetary matters that the rest of my claim would not be persued..

 

MBNA have until 18th ... Mon to reply.. I don't think they will.... all I'll get is £80 back by default.

 

On another note .. the SARS request I submitted to MBNA on 07 August has been answered today with a letter containg charges on my account from 2001. I spoke to MBNA Vice president of something or other who said that they are getting so many requests for refund of charges that they automatically treat all SARs requests as a request for charges..

He apologised and said that he would get the information together as a matter of urgency.. Asking how long he had till the 40 Day deadline, I said.. Till Monday.. He said that was impossible .. it would take 2 weeks to get the information together..

 

When I said " That means you will be in breach of the regulations " He replied " Then We'll be in breach of the regulations"

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...