Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

perverting course of justice


535boy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4729 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good evening all.

in march 2006,i was caught drink driving and silly me gived the police fake details,they finaly found out and i got charged for perverting course of justice and got 10 months custody[i did 5months].i was sentenced on 10 march 2006.

 

Since then,i have been a good boy and no problems with the law and have been paying my taxes.Today i got an opportunity to start a new business but to run the business it requires a licences which is issued by the county court.Am filling the application form for the licence now and it is asking if i had ever been charged for fraud or violence and not that if i have any criminal history and in bracket it say [ rehabilitation of offenders act 1974 applies].Shall i tick this as yes or no. .. is perverting course of justice a fraud[bearing in mind i lied to police ].

 

Along with the application i have to attach my CRB and as mentioned i have had a clean life before and after this incident. Will this charge effect my chances of getting the licence to run the business?

 

any help please..

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for the reply, will i still get the licence to operate or is that a no go.

 

Part 2

8. Have you been convicted of any offence involving fraud or other dishonesty or violence?

(The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 applies to this question) Yes No

If YES, please state l Date of conviction

l Place of conviction

or order

In support of your answer (Yes OR No) you must exhibit a certified copy,

not more than a month old, of a search made against your full name and

Link to post
Share on other sites

Private Bailiffs (Certificated Bailiffs

 

Certificated bailiffs are granted a certificate by a County Court Judge which allows them to Levy Distress. The certificate lasts for just two years and authorises the bailiff to levy distress anywhere in England and Wales. To obtain a certificate, the applicant must satisfy the Judge that he is a “fit and proper person” to hold a certificate, and that he has a sufficient knowledge of the law of distress, and also that he is not in the business of buying debts. They must also provide two references, undergo a criminal records check, a County Court Judgment check and finally, provide a security bond of £10,000. This final requirement normally being an insurance bond.

 

They are not officers of the court and are not employed by the court. However, they are seen as representatives of the court because they act under the authority of a Certificate issued by the court. The court therefore exercises, under the certification process, a certain amount of control over the standards of competence and conduct of these bailiffs. Other than that, there is no formal regulatory structure of Certificated Bailiffs, although those that are members of the Certificated Bailiffs Association are subject to the complaints procedure of that body.

Only Certificated Bailiffs can carry out distress for rent, council tax, non-domestic rates and parking fines, child support agency arrears etc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

probably not. it was only four years ago and involved lying to the police.

 

In that case, the OP is assured a certificate to act as a bailiff! afterall lying to the police and breaking the law are vital techniques for the modern Bailiff.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Link to post
Share on other sites

As it would seem that things are against you, you should apply anyway. They can only say no if you don't meet the required standard so you will at least know where you stand for a few years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

worth noting that if you tell the truth, you might get accepted. If you lie then you will at some point be caught out and then that lie will certainly screw you for any other vaguely similar role that requires a fit and proper person test.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Sorry but the idea of a bailiff who has conviction for perverting the course of justice just screams out NO.

 

There are enough of them out there with questionable behaviour and power complexes to surely make the weeding out process of new bailiffs hopefully quite viscious.

 

Bit like if you want to ba a policeman, would they accept perverting the course of justice as trustworthy candidate.

 

Sorry but heres me hoping this person gets turned down for revenue enforcement who will come into contact with possible vulnerable people.

 

We all make mistakes, but remember revenue enforcement doesnt care about that if you are a debtor xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Hi

Welcome to The Consumer Action Group.

 

 

I am just letting you know that as you haven't had any replies to your post yet, it might be better if you post your message again in an appropriate sub-forum. You will get lots of help there.

 

Also take some time to read around the forum and get used to the layout. It is a big forum and takes a lot of getting used to.

 

 

Once you start to find your way, you will soon realise that it is fairly easy to get round and to get the help you need.

 

It can be bit confusing at first.

Please be advised that my time will be limited for the next few weeks.Thanks for your understanding.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...