Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Know it has already been answered, but? Does not explain why JCI has registered a different default date when they get the information from the original creditor, Virgin
    • Since you were stopped at the time there is no requirement for the police give you anything there and then or to send you anything before they have decided how to deal with the offence.  They have three choices: Offer you a course Offer you a fixed penalty (£100 and three points) Prosecute you in court  The only option that has a formal time limit is (3). They must begin court proceedings within six months of the date of the alleged offence. Options (1) and (2) have no time limit but since the only alternative the police have if you decline those offers is (3) they will not usually offer a course beyond three months from the date of the offence and will not usually offer a fixed penalty beyond four months from that date. This is so as to allow time for the driver to accept and comply with their offer and to give them the time to go to option (3) if he declines or ignores it.  Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, the action they take will usually be in accordance with the National Police Chiefs' Council's guidance on speeding enforcement. In a 40mph limit this is as follows Up to 45mph - no action. Between 46mph and 53mph - offer a course Between 54mph and 65mph - offer a fixed penalty Over 65mph - prosecution in court So you can see that 54mph should see you offered a fixed penalty. Three weeks is not overly long for a fixed penalty offer to arrive. As well as that, there has been Easter in that period which will have slowed things down a bit. However, I would suggest that if it gets to about two months from the offence date and you have still heard nohing, I would contact the ticket office for the area where you were stopped to see if anything has been sent to you. Of course this raises the danger that you might be "stirring the hornets' nest". But in all honesty, if the police have decided to take no action, you jogging their memory should not really influence them. The bigger danger, IMHO, is that your fixed penalty offer may have been sent but lost and if you do not respond it will lapse. This will see the police revert to option (3) above. Whilst there is a mechanism to persuade the court to sentence you at the fixed penalty level (rather than in accordance with the normal guidelines which will see a harsher penalty), it relies on them believing you when you say you did not received an offer. In any case it is aggravation you could well do without so for the sake of a phone call, I'd enquire if it was me.  I think I've answered all your questions but if I can help further just let me know.
    • Looks similar to you original email to their Complaints team. I dont rate copypasta for a CEO complaint. Rewrite it with emotion involved as to how badly this is affecting you and make them feel embarrassed for their actions... 
    • Well, not quite the trouncing they deserve, and Andy Street suffering - despite distancing himself from the poops and being a good mayor (and despite the rather ridiculous muslim voter labour boycott across regions - did they really want the tories to stay in power?) - But not bad at all The Reformatory goons managed two council seats didn't it - out of over 300 they tried for ..     
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Help filling out the N244 Form


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3743 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I then asked for the appeal to be sent to TAPAS

 

You're making me hungry!

 

The council had a choice over whether to accept your PE2/3, and it's the strength of the reasons you gave which should hold sway. A lot of N244 applications succeed, because the courts don't much like having councils take up their time with these matters.

 

You need to get across the reasons you gave originally for filing the PE2 late, and ask the court to accept this. You don't need to go into the PCN itself, just focus on the lateness of the application and why the council should accept it.

 

If there is a specific section of the form you want help with, can you advise which part?

Link to post
Share on other sites

The address change could be important.

 

I am not too clear on the chain of events. What should happen initially is this:

 

PCN issued to the vehicle

- you can appeal

- if you appeal you get a reply

If not cancelled or paid, a Notice to Owner is issued to the registered keeper (according to the address held by DVLA)

- you can appeal

- if you appeal you get a reply

If not cancelled or paid, you can refer to PATAS, and if you do not, a Charge Certificate is issued to the registered keeper

 

The question is, at what stage did you appeal?

 

And the other question is, at what point in this process did you move house?

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, so your case should be based on the fact that you made a formal representation but did not receive a response.

 

The problem for you is that you appealed around Feb 2010 but did not move house until October 2010. I assume therefore that the Council was sending the notices to the correct address.

 

Your reason for filing the statutory declaration late was that you did not receive these notices - but if they were sent to the right address at the time, this could be judged either way. So I don't think the address change will help your case.

 

It's difficult to know how this one will pan out. I think the best you can do is proceed with the N244 and hope that you have a sympathetic judge at the hearing. Most of them side with the motorist, and a high proportion of N244 applications are accepted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't call the bailiff just yet.

 

When your stat dec is rejected you have a period (14 days I think) to file an N244. Your last letter should state this. The Council should hold the case for that period to see if you do file an N244. If you've timed out, bailiffs can pursue but if not, the Council are wrong and you should call back and ask for a supervisor. Quote the dates on your rejection letter.

 

(In any case, once TEC have the N244 they will advise the Council and then the case will be on hold regardless - so the window is very short.)

Link to post
Share on other sites

They do not "cease" bailiff activity, but they do suspend it (the difference being that it's on temporary hold until matters are sorted). This case should be on hold. If I were you I would call again and get clarification of this. As I said, ask for a supervisor, since not all staff will be up to speed on bailiff cases.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Hi Kool,

Could you please let me know what was the outcome of your N244. as I am in same position I would like to know if its worth to fill N244?

 

thanks in advance

 

There's no point in asking, to be honest. Every case is different and will pan out differently.

 

Best thing to do is start a thread of your own, summarise what has happened so far, and you will get some advice which will hopefully help you out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...