Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Marbles - Off To A Rolling Start!!


pelvicthrust
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6396 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:eek:

 

Ok, after much deliberation (and what feels now like cowardice!), I sent a D.P.A. request letter . Less than 2 weeks later, I received the cheque for £10(!) and a whole list of transaction and charges. They 'waived' the charges. Anyway, I've had a look at the charges....each charge is £20. Now is that too low to claim back, anyone know?

 

PT:lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. I've sent off a Prelim. Letter requesting payback! Which only actually amounts to £80 ..but eh its all money. Maybe i was taking the step-by-step instructions too literally where it says '£25-£39'. Now I'm building up confidence to the bigger ones owed to me!

PT

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pelvic thrust claim all amounts !! £1 is too much:) and dont forget to work out how much interest they have charged you(spreadsheet in templates ),because thats your money too

:grin:amount WON so far £15,021.27(12 claims):D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a brush-off letter from a 'senior complaints Advisor' at marbles. Summarised it says that 'HFC banks charges are fair and reasonable' and that the 'HFC Bank......does not accept its findings' , but for 'commercial reasons' is reducing its credit card charges for the future. 'The amount of charges and the circumstances that they are applied, is set out clearly in the HFC's banks credit card agreements'

They 'regret' they are not prepared to refund......so-on and so-on.

I'm so tempted to thank them for the knowledge that we can ignore the law when we want to and the next time I get a speeding fine, I'll just say " I'm sorry Officer I don't accept this fine! ". On the other hand I could send a L.B.A.

Can someone reassure me that I'm doing the right thing? Of course I havn't read the credit card agreements that they are claiming as their defence, and neither do I have them anymore.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had this letter after sending LBA, These so called responsible lenders who are a fit person under the CCA, are using their power to put the pressure on you or us to fold. The only thing they are in awe of is the court. If you present your case properly they will not go there, as they have no defence. The only thing that makes them pay up is court action. So keep going on your course of action and youwill get your money back. Good luck.

 

Regards bish.

Abbey : £8070.41*PAID IN FULL*14/02/07:D

Capital one : LBA sent 17/09/06 £1,087.22

Marbles : LBA sent 17/09/06 £720.00 ; £720 offer accepted:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've had a reply saying they will give me half of the amount owed, £40 (tight or what?) if i agree not to bother them again...because I'm a 'valued customer of the bank'. Wonder what constitutes a un-valued customer? Anyway they can spin.....I want it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got the same letter, despite having closed my account down over a year ago. :confused: They even offered to pay it into my card account, that was closed over a year ago :rolleyes:

As you'll see from my sig, held out and got the full amount a week later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Marvellous, they've offered the full amount.As long as I agree not to make any further legal actions on this matter (-why would I?; they're paying me ALL i owe?) idiots. ....and of course its a 'goodwill' gesture. Nonsense. Anyway all paid up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...