Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Rather like farage .. Reform UK plans ‘don’t add up’ and costings are out ‘by tens of billions of pounds per year’, says IFS – UK general election live | General election 2024 | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM As Nigel Farage launches party’s manifesto, Institute for Fiscal Studies says ‘the package as a whole is problematic’   "Reform UK has published its manifesto. They plan tax cuts which they say will cost £70bn; however our analysis shows that they’ve miscalculated, and the actual cost will be at least £93bn. Reform UK says it will fund these tax costs with £70bn of savings and additional revenue, but it provides few details. Their proposal to change Bank of England reserve rules is over-stated by at least £15bn, and the cost would likely fall on businesses and consumers, not banks. These two factors mean that Reform UK’s plans have a total unfunded cost of at least £38bn – about twice the unfunded cost of Liz Truss’ ill-fated 2022 “mini-budget”.
    • The finance company has a 50% stake (legal Owner) in the deal so I would certainly involve them. As for the outstanding £3635 bill thats owing to Mercedes in Croydon I wouldn't be in a rush to settle that just yet and keep it in abeyance as leverage.  Where are you at with Doves in Horsham ?
    • or go really bold ... Further to my request for a copy of the agreement you refer to on ( date) I made a section 78 request pursuant to the Credit Consumer Act 1974 to which you have yet to reply or respond. Pursuant to the Credit Consumer act 1974 section 78 (6) If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1)— (a) he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement.
    • Pers I'd stop paying the lot and get each defaulted by a dn issuance.  Defaults can't hurt future renting no Only ccj's Can't keep saying the same answers.    Dx        
    • Ok thank you. That’s where we are getting confused, as we’re not sure where we stand legally. But we’re still unsure who we should be going to now, the dealer or the finance company? I’m assuming the evidence we have (the reports from Mercedes) showing that the fault was there when we purchased would be sufficient to prove this? To be honest we would prefer to send the car back completely as are now concerned more problems may arise.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

GORNAL MOTOR COMPANY -Engine problem /CCJ Awarded.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4867 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

But according from the information we have from the company formation-this was in November 2010.

There is no historical entries before that.

My concerns are that if the business deal was not done with the Limited Company (who now must hold the vehicle stock in their assets)

Then he will argue that there is no liability due from the Limited Company.

If the deal was done with the former non limited company,then as TGP says this would have been with xxx T/A xxxxxx

or in the case of a partnership xxxx and xxxxx T/A xxxxx

If that business has ceased to exist,nevertheless the sole trader or partnership would be liable with no protection from a Limited liability.

So is it not right to say that the sole trader or partnership could still remain liable personally for debts under the old company ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Ok so the crux therefore would be in being able to identify and levy on the individuals assets which were not now part of the limited company.

My guess is that these 2 will no doubt have made provisions for this.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you have any details for the MOT business so we can check if that is a limited co ?

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Brilliant

Federation of Small Businesses

And local good garage scheme.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm regretting advising you to talk to a bailiff!

 

As you will read elsewhere on this forum, a bailiff will 'try it on', regardless of the legal technicalities.

 

What i think you need to do:

 

Unless the MOT business is a Ltd company, then it is merely an asset of Mr A or Mr B, whom we have deduced are jointly, personally liable for the judgement.

 

I believe a warrant can be issued to an adress that the defendant is "known to conduct his business".

 

So if you have a judgement against either Mr A or Mr B, they are both jointly liable, and i'm pretty sure you can issue a warrant to the address of the MOT business.

 

State the known facts to the court and the bailiffs:

 

1) Mr A & Mr B traded as a partnership 'the gornel motor company'

 

2) I have a judgement against Mr A or B (or both).

 

3) Mr A (or B) are known to conduct business from XXXXXXXXXX MOT station.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm regretting advising you to talk to a bailiff!

 

As you will read elsewhere on this forum, a bailiff will 'try it on', regardless of the legal technicalities.

 

What i think you need to do:

 

Unless the MOT business is a Ltd company, then it is merely an asset of Mr A or Mr B, whom we have deduced are jointly, personally liable for the judgement.

 

I believe a warrant can be issued to an adress that the defendant is "known to conduct his business".

 

So if you have a judgement against either Mr A or Mr B, they are both jointly liable, and i'm pretty sure you can issue a warrant to the address of the MOT business.

 

State the known facts to the court and the bailiffs:

 

1) Mr A & Mr B traded as a partnership 'the gornel motor company'

 

2) I have a judgement against Mr A or B (or both).

 

3) Mr A (or B) are known to conduct business from XXXXXXXXXX MOT station.

 

Tough decisions. I can not let these people get away with it.

 

Can I not amend the name to Mr A & Mr B, Gornal Motor Company LTD?

 

It is confirmed that both partners are registered to the company as the directors.

 

Surely they have broken Business Names Act 1985?

Link to post
Share on other sites

"Can I not amend the name to Mr A & Mr B, Gornal Motor Company LTD?"

 

If you can, and they (gornel) know what they are on about, or come here for help. Your warrant will be useless.

 

Just get the warrant in the name of one or both partners, and furnish the court / bailiffs with all known addresses for them.

 

Read this:

 

http://www.ascotlawyers.co.uk/small-business-tips.php

 

But do me a favor, if they are genuinely financially stressed, as opposed to taking the p***, then please be a reasonable creditor and accept a payment proposal instead of removing goods.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks TGP. I will be putting the warrant in both of their names, as more information is better than none.

 

I have refrained from going into detail but I have tried to be reasonable. They promised us a refund if we were not happy or an exchange. When we asked for this they refused. After nearly hitting me and pushing my grandfather, the owner agreed to an exchange. They offered us a car £350 less than we had paid. We accepted to be decent but when it come to doing the deal, they also tried to make us give them the tax disc from the old car, worth £100, which we paid for. When we refused, they then didn't want to know. They have over £40,000 worth of cars on site. These are the sort of people I am dealing with.

 

I tried to be fair and it has got me no where. I have had 7 months of stress and I am getting the money back. They have not made an offer or anything at all. Just ignored us.

 

Also, if I put the warrant as above, would that cover the HCEO even if they do not go to the business address, they could still go to the personal address etc?

 

I checked the invoice and all it said was Trade Sale and signed by one of the owners.

Edited by Stresful Life
Link to post
Share on other sites

"After nearly hitting me and pushing my grandfather,"

 

Reasonable????

 

Go straight to Defcon 1.

 

Look into a high court enforcement officer if the ccj is more than £600.

 

Just google 'HCEO' and you'll get plenty of ******'s who will be more than willing to help.

 

Some of them can even help resolve your queries / issues.

 

Good luck.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank You TGP.

 

I am just trying to get the money back anyway I can. If anything had to go to court, I would be confident as well. They have broke The Sales Of Goods Act 1979 and also, they didn't turn up for court etc. So all the proof is there. HCEO will be sorting it for me, I just need to amend the names via the N244 form I believe and then wait for that to go through, then judgment and then the HCEO. Such a daunting process.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Regarding the N244 form I am waiting on....

 

1. Will I have to go back to court or can the judge make the decision to amend the name without a hearing?

 

2. How long does the form take to process when sent back?

 

3. If it is approved, do I have to re enter judgment?

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm regretting advising you to talk to a bailifflink3.gif!

 

There are times when we have to use them,and nothing gives greater satisfaction than when the tables are turned.

Over the years theres been some classic examples,including the famous one where the bailiffs were ready to remove the tellers from a high street bank.............:lol:

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

haha that is justice served well!

 

Does anyone have any idea regarding the questions below please?

 

Regarding the N244 form I am waiting on....

 

1. Will I have to go back to court or can the judge make the decision to amend the name without a hearing?

 

2. How long does the form take to process when sent back?

 

3. If it is approved, do I have to re enter judgment?

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

I believe this will be the form. Could someone help me fill it in please?

 

http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_e.pdf

 

Questions 3,4,5 and 9 seem the most complicated. Any ideas what to put for these please?

 

I am sitting here waiting for it to come through the post and I can fill this in and print it off, if anyone could help me please?

 

Thank You

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes no reasons why you can not fill this in online and print it off

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question 3.

 

Question 3

 

Claimant seeks to ammend the particulars of claim in respect of of the defendants named in the original issued.

The claimant has become aware that the named defendants in the claims original form,is not satisfactory for enforcing the judgement.

The reasons for the Claimants error,is due to misunderstandings of correct service in the case of business related claims.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question 4

 

Draft

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Question 5 tick without.

If the Judge decides a hearing is required - you will be notified.

Have a happy and prosperous 2013 by avoiiding Payday loans. If you are sent a private message directing you for advice or support with your issues to another website,this is your choice.Before you decide,consider the users here who have already offered help and support.

Advice offered by Martin3030 is not supported by any legal training or qualification.Members are advised to use the services of fully insured legal professionals when needed.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...