Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Please Help me with the Amex Muppets


console_2002
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4829 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I like many others hit financial difficulty and was unable to keep up with my amex payments, at first I ignored the letters from amex and various collectors then after about 9 months of paying nothing I was in a position to borrow some money from family and in July 2010 I made there collector at the time an offer of full and final settlements for around 40pence in the £

 

I heard nothing back other than template collection letters from other agents, then in January this year I received a letter from Vilcollections stating that as i have made no attempt to correspond or make any payments they would unless I paid in full or a substantial amount within 7 be recommending my bankruptcy.

 

I responded to Vilcollections with the following letter.

 

Dear Personal Bankruptcy Unit

RE: American Express Services Europe

I write with reference to the money which you are claiming on the above account.

On the 15th May 2010 I received a letter from Brachers LLP informing me they are acting on behalf of American Express Europe Limited, I complied with the letters request for a personal financial statement and at the time made an offer for full and final settlement of the account on the provision that American Express supplied me with a statement of the account along with a copy of the original signed agreement, Brachers LLP has failed to respond to my letter dated 17 July 2010.

I have received no notification of the debt being passed on and I have not received any communication of my offer for full and final being refused or any supporting documents asked for from Brachers or American express.

The OFT Debt Collection Guidance 2003 makes it quite clear in section 2.6 f that pressurising debtors to pay in full, in unreasonably large instalments, or to increase payments when they are unable to do so is unfair practice, however your letter clearly states that unless I make a substantial payment within seven days to your company you will be advising the Client to send a statutory demand and continue to bankruptcy.

Section h also states ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment is also an unfair practice, As this alleged debt stands I am dealing with Brachers LLP who have I have made a substantial offer to but who have failed to respond to my requests to settle the account.

I would ask that you refer the case back to where you purchased it as you have incomplete records and should not be pursuing this debt when Brachers and American express have failed to provide details I have asked for despite being made a substantial offer. This is clearly covered in section I, failing to investigate and/or provide details as appropriate, when a debt is queried or disputed, possibly resulting in debtors being wrongly pursued.

Yours sincerely

I received a response from both Vil and amex stating they would investigate the case.

I today received a letter from Amex stating that the investigation is complete and they have no records of me making any offers of payments to the account and that i should pay vilcollections in full.

They also included the following which is part of the information I requested back in July 10 from the agent collecting. This is not a poor quality scan on my part this is exactly what I was sent, on two single sided pieces of A4 the poor quality is there scanning.

signature.jpg

 

My question now is how do I follow this up, they say they have no records of my offer, I am no longer in a position to settle this or make any payments, however I can not go bankrupt as it will prevent me from working in the industry I am trained and seek work in.

I am now prepared to fight this as much as I can as Amex simply do not play ball, I have the copy of the letter I made as an offer and i have copies of the letters they have sent from there collection agents.

I was thinking my next step would be to wait to hear from vilcollections and then hit them with faults in the credit agreement to stop them pushing for a bankruptcy, my credit rating is already shot so I have no issues about defaults. (£12K on card)

I have never disputed the debt I only offered a full and final on the condition they proved it.

Please advise on what my next move should be / points or defects I should quote from the agreement I was sent. The first point i noted was it does not contain my address and it has no authorisation signature by them.

all comments on this would be welcomed.

Regards

Console

11-02-2011 15;32;42.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...