Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Brighthouse Urgent Advce needed


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4873 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi guys, this refers to an account opened in 2009.

 

Basically i signed up in store for a laptop and took out both insurances all payments were maintaied and up to date then about a month after havng product i went on a train woth laptop and forgot/lost it on train and departed train without it.

 

I informed Brighthouse immediatly who told me i was " lying ****" and they would contact police for "obtaining good by deception"

 

I conacted the British transport police who reviewed cctv and seen me boarding with laptop but leaving without and they followed the train and seen another male walking off with my laptop a few stops later on journey. British transport police issued me with a crime number which i provided to Brighthouse.

 

I was getting knocks on my door every day and harrasing phonecalls for about 2 months as store said i was still liable and had to pay, so my question was why was I paying insurance?? At point of sale the advisor told me as it was a laptop it was covered away from home same applies to a mobile of bought from them apparently.

 

Its now 2011 and out of the blue this has been brought up again and i am having letters demanding full payment? Can anyone tell me where i stand legally??

 

In 2009 i tried to complain to customer realtions and was told that it had to be dealt with by store manager and he was nothing but a bully, also there staff used to come into my place of employment to intimidate me and on one occasion a female member of there staff said in front of all the staff in my store "when you coming to see us to pay for your laptop"

My Responce was are you licenced to discuss accounts in public and she quickly left?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no legal eagle, ut a SAR is required here. Getting this will let you see what the credit agreement as for. Also the terms and condtion etc and th insurance policies should be attatched showing what your covered for.

Im sure from here someone on here will be better placed to advise you further

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...