Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Wonga Going Wobbly??


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4856 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

 

Having used Wonga on and off over that last year or so, I applied for a new loan last week.

 

Usually, everything goes extremely quickly but in this instance, after a lot of chasing via email and phone, my money was finally paid in 3 days later.

 

I had agreed and have the loan agreement to show that repayment will be made by the end of February. I have received no other notification from them in writing, by text, email or phone advising me that they would be taking this payment today.

 

Today, I log onto my bank account to pay some bills to find that Wonga have taken the money that isn't due until the end of February today, yet logging into my Wonga account shows that my loan is still outstanding.

 

I have called and emailed as well as attaching a copy of my bank statement pointing out that I have a loan agreement stating a date that they have not kept to and I am still waiting for a response.

 

What exactly are my rights in this instance?

 

Bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

Go to the OFT and Trading Standards, Wonga have broken the agreement by taking money early. Also report them to the police as this is 'fraud' - they love to claim they are in touch with fraud experts, isn't taking money when it isn't due fraud.

 

Also as they have taken money early ask them for a refund based on their default interest charges for the 'early repayment'.

 

Play them at their own game and see how they like it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It iisn't the Consumer Credit Act you quote to the OFT, it is the OFT guidelines available on their main pages.

 

The OFT have reminded another PDL company about taking money out on a day not nominated, and there is a BBC reporter called Lucy Proctor who wants PDL stories - you can do a search on her username lucyproctor to find her contact details.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Just thought I'd update you.

 

Having chased Wonga for a fair part of Monday, they happened to finally call me back on my mobile whilst I was on the phone to ConsumerDirect. I finished my call on loudspeaker so that they could hear.

 

I don't know if that had any effect but the upshot was the money was paid back into my account immediately, the loan is now an interest free one as will my next one (there won't be but it's nice of them to offer just in case) and I was sent a rather nice bottle of wine with an apology for their handling of the situation.

 

Could have done without the stress but at least they did the decent thing in how they remedied things - can't ask any more than that really!

 

bel

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...