Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

My abbey claim so far ....Help ?


andytc
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6463 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi

 

I sent out my first letter regarding Statements for past 6 years using the template , with enclosed £10 fee.

 

On 07/09/06 I received the microfiche reply as detailed here in the forums, but with no statements at all, just the letter.

 

I have some bank statements from last year but they are far from complete, so i cannot estimate the size of my claim. Just for these sporadic statements alone i have found over £800.00 in charges.

 

Am i correct that i should now send the letter for the non-compliance of the data protection act.??

 

 

An Interesting thing happened on friday. I Checked my bank account on-line and found £260 IN CHARGES for last month. I Phoned them with a different approach this time (I kept calm and didn't mention don corleone and the mafia :D)

I was given the usual waffle about charges , blah , blah , blah and told i could take it further and make an "appeal" and that they could return only £55 to me now. I told the person on the phone that i wouldn't bother with that "appeal" procedure and that i would make my claim by "another route". She asked me to hang on , she was gone ages , then returned and said " i've spoken to a diferent supervisor and i can return £210 in charges to your account" ...... !!!!!

 

What a turn around...

 

 

anyway...onward ..ever onward...

 

So, back to my question ..... should I now send the letter for the non-compliance of the data protection act.??

 

 

Many Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

Personally I wouldn't bother making any phonecalls to Abbey.

Follow the procedure on this site.

Send the second letter. If you don't get your statements then issue a claim.

Always send it to the DP department, if you get a reply from a different department send it to both just to be sure.

I actually had my request refused twice by a department I did not correspond with.

Hope this helps

Link to post
Share on other sites

Only send the letter for non-compliance with DPA if you intend to follow it through to the end. Most of us who have put in estimated claims base it on what we have received which is usually about 14 months and what we already had. If you have a year's worth then you can work out the charges and multiply by how many years you are claiming for. This is reasonable. It is what I did and I am at AQ stage. Others have already been paid.

;) nn

FAQs: click here: http://READ THESE

 

Any views or opinions expressed are in good faith, to the best of my ability. I don't like to admit it, but I have been known to be wrong. Check other threads and if in doubt, seek professional advice.

 

 

Abbey: SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

BoS M/card SETTLED 27/09:lol:

Aqua CC (Halifax) SETTLED 28/06 :lol:

GMAC Request for refund 14/6; Prelim 31/7; LBA 11/9

First National Mortgage Data Protection Act sent 14/6 Statements 26/7

Cap 1 - SETTLED IN FULL:lol:

Abbey x 2: 50% offer refused AQ filed

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...