Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Payday companies contacting your employers?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4918 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I have three payday loans and may have to default this month - I am going to contact the companies and ask for a payment plan - but what I am worried about is will the payday companies contact my employers about it, demanding the money?

 

I'm a person who get very embarrassed about my money problems and I don't think I could stand people at work knowing about it? :sad:

 

Has this happened before? If I don't pay them will they hound my employers?

Link to post
Share on other sites

no thats unlawful

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Although when you apply they do ask for employment info, maybe in the small print there is something that gives them permission to check your employment status but going any further than that would prob be unlawful.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but we need to be clear on afew things here

 

no creditor is allowed to contact your works about these personal issues

 

& although i don't advocat the head-in-sand act, contacting some these co's directly to discuss things - possibly opens you to further questionable tactics.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

sorry but we need to be clear on afew things here

 

no creditor is allowed to contact your works about these personal issues

 

& although i don't advocat the head-in-sand act, contacting some these co's directly to discuss things - possibly opens you to further questionable tactics.

 

dx

 

But if the T & C's do say that they will contact your employers (to check employment status, etc) then it is perfectly legal, I myself have taken out a loan and I believe my employer was contacted to check I was actually employed there, mortgage companies would do the same for obvious reasons, (i.e to check that you actually are earning £xx).

 

Of course this doesnt apply after the loan has been taken out and they are hassling your employer for no valid reason.

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

moving forward, put down the boxing gloves, after you default payday uk will come to an arragement, normally anything up to 12 months will do. WDA anything up to 6 months normally fine and Swift, if you can do three months that would make life easier for you. they are smaller and can be more difficult then the other two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should not contact employer but there is always the possibility. Some companies have it written in their tc's. It appears to be mainly a threat to ebarrass you in to paying. They will of course call you at work and somtimes leave messages. Jamies advice on answering your mobile works for many.

Link to post
Share on other sites

if its written in the T&C they canot use that to harrass you through your work.

 

they may well make intitial contact to confirm employment but thats where it should end.

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...