Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

T v Monument - help please


Trudianne
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6477 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Can anyone help ---- I had statements so wrote asking for £364 they had taken in charges.

Unfortunately I wrote (because I was too hasty to get going) the LBA not the Preliminary letter that I thought I was writing.

Monument have written back saying they are looking in to my "complaint" and will get back to me by 27 Sept.

Now, in my letter to them I gave them 14 days to give me my money back or I would take further action.

Should I wait until 27th or stick to the 14 days I gave them and start the next stage.......?

T:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Normally, the advice on this site is always "Stick to YOUR timetable, not THEIRS".

 

However, in this case you might consider giving them the extra few days leeway, since you feel you "jumped the gun" a little with your LBA. You need to be able to stand up in court, if necessary, and be confident that you've been reasonable.

 

You might consider writing back saying that you "look forward to the results of their investigation" (or whatever) but warning them that if the matter is not fully resolved to your satisfaction by 27 Sept then it'll be a case of "further action without notice"

 

Does that sound reasonable?

Victimnomore

By day, quiet unassuming bank customer - but, by night, .. .. .. .. ..

Barclays Case1

14/03/07 **WON** FULL settlement £3358.39

Barclays Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £187.91 back.

Halifax Case1

14/03/07 **WON** Refunded £728 (including £54 costs)

Halifax Case2

08/09/08 Prelim: please give me my £268.24 back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that....I thought I should give them a few days grace (only to show how reasonable I am!!) and I will do as you suggest and write to them.

 

I knew someone could help - this site it SO brilliant.

 

Thanks again.

 

T:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't know for sure but, after the 14 days given in the first letter expires, then the LBA gives them a further 14. That, from what I have learned from reading things on this site will satisfy a court that you have given them reasonable time to enter into a sincere dialogue and to settle the matter without resorting to legal action. So giving few days extra grace may not be sufficient.

 

The wording "entering sincere dialogue" seems to impact too. It's part of the wording in the first letter.

 

I would send the initial letter to be absolutely sure and begin the process properly. Perhaps if you PM a MOD with a link to this thread, they would be able to set you straight. Don't take my word for it though. It's quite feasable that the LBA alone will suffice.

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya. There has been a directive which has advised banks that whilst the account is in dispute, that they should not close accounts or call in overdrafts. I don't know a thing about Monument though.

 

My suggestion to you is that you PM MOD this evening. Cut and paste this to them:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/29494-t-monument-help-please.html#post236411

 

and ask for their advice. Do you know how to contact a MOD?

To follow my case progress, click here to see where I'm at right now.

 

Welshman

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I think the first thing you should do is to write to them and let them know that you formally dispute the amount that is owed. Make it clear that you are currently in the process of reclaiming £xxx and that this may be resolved by a court.

 

I'm afraid that account closure is always a risk - more with some than others - but if you are desparate to keep this account open, you might have to consider an immediate injunction via the courts. I'm not overly familiar with this process so you would have to contact BankFodder. As I understand it, there are many variables as to how likely that action would be to achieving your goal, i.e. the way the account has been run etc etc.

 

If you need to ask BankFodder for help click here Send a private message to BankFodder

 

Please copy and paste your thread link into the message if you know how - this bit...

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/29494-t-monument-help-please.html#post237756

 

and describe what has been threatened and that you'd like to fight it.

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

Thank you for your advice - all very gratefully received.

 

I'm not desperate to keep the account open in fact the sooner it is closed and paid off the better - just didn't want to have to stump up the £500.

 

Many thanks again.

 

T:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ask for the original agreement. If they do try to close the account it could put a spanner in the works, since no original agreement, no account to close!

 

Mike

If I've helped tip my scales

 

Blair Oliver & Scott, £2500 written off December 2006 Default removed January 2007:D

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/56001-mike220359-blair-oliver-scott.html

 

Monument, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

Lloyds TSB didn't sign the agreement!

:D

 

Citicards, didn't sign the agreement

:D

 

RBS tut, tut!

:rolleyes:

 

Morgan Stanley, oh dear

:rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...