Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Shocking costs created by Tory led Government in 2012. Taxpayers brace for £100bn money-printing bill – as George Osborne says it’s ‘not my responsibility’ MSN WWW.MSN.COM  
    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

one problem after another


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5004 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Viscous fans usually seize so overcool, so they were wrong there.

QUOTE]

 

Sorry Conniff, have to disagree there. The explanation further on is correct however as you correctly point out but bilt in is a failsafe so this shouldn't happen. If it does happen that the clutch so to speak binds or seizes this is very apparent as sounds like a jet engine and the consequential drag pulls down fuel consumption like no tomorrow so to speak. If it had failed in this mode it would have been blatantly apparent to not only the owner but the garage itself.

 

I think out of the countless cases of viscous couplings I have changed and come across I can only recall two that have locked and one of those had a self tapper through it!!!

 

The cat will affect running especially if it has collapsed but will not cause an overheating problem. As you know and point out, the lambda sensor is purely a measuring device so is nebulous to actual mechanical issues.

 

This is a very odd one indeed.

 

Perhaps the op could give a few more details as I'm not aware that mercs put engine and transmission control units under the rear seat. Body control etc yes.

 

Smoke could be new parts of exhaust paint burnig off.

 

All seems a bit odd to me at the moment me thinks.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

True Connif it does happen and the other instance I came across just happened to be an XJ12 where it locked and went through the radiator. Perfect hole though!! Interestingly it must have been of the same era as your SD1.

 

The smoke problem does mystify me ( which is expected with smoke I suppose) as even if appeared before the exhaust system had changed does not tie up with normal (thermal incidents).

 

Too vauge at the moment perhaps?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that suf as it confirms my statement on the coupling. If the mechanic was brave enough to stick his hand in there then the coupling is shot and is perhaps might have been the cause of the original overheating. If the fan was locked or working normally and he put his hand in there then he would be pretty "armless by now"

 

It's not unusual to have a coupling failure in conjunction with a head gasket and the garage should have isolated the fan fault first though this is not easy to do at idle depending on speed. I've seen it time and time again. Generally one would go with this type of fan first.

 

The problem I'm trying to get my head around is the smoke as I can't see how it is related. Can you give an indication of the smell? There are very disticnt differences in them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As regards looking up the coupling, wiki conniff has explained it well in the operation only emitting that they are designed to fail as yours has done. But as we know there are times when it goes the other way and will lock up but believe me you'd know it. In fact, when locked the noise is incredible!

 

Heat shields from a car of that era would be expected over the silencers/expansion chambers but not necessarily over the pipes.

 

The smell from electrical items burning is quite disticntive as is that of clutches/brakes etc. It's as such that you can tell it on a motorway with lorries etc. As also is rubber.

 

The fact that it smelt like a bonfire does start to point me towards a gearbox failure and you vibration faults along with overheating.

 

When you have been able to enjoy the car so to speak have you noticed any change in the way it shifts gear?

 

The symptoms are starting to tie up now and do link in with overheating of the engine as well believe it or not. Can you confirm if the wiring to the units under the seat showed signs of wiring melting etc and if they do is the melting consistent all around the wire or just underneath?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...