Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • it's 85k of turnover (well, now £90k). However, you're digging yourself into another hole here. That ship has probably long since sailed. Is it worth pursuing this? You're not going to get anything back from it either way.
    • Hi,   A few pointers from yesterday to take note of evris cpr 27.9 failed again so we should really make issue of this also their WX fail to comply with CPR so again we should take issue with their statement of truth  you cant get tort if you get damages under subsection 7 of CRA because its double recovery  - not sure what we think of this? however its the first time i saw the judges make reference to your non automatic rights from s49 which s54 and 57 assist with. We should start stating this specifically for claims as I think its much better than just 49 and 57 as we need to make it clear where our non automatic rights come from as 54 automatic frankly dont help  I have sent the claim form and defences to the admin email because I can’t upload them for some reason as it wont let me but thought this may help as its the first time we’ve taken tort to trial. although i think the DDJ was honestly struggling to understand some parts of the law because he was asking me about them and how he should interpret them, especially for the automatic. Will apply for transcript if you want it?
    • I decided on confrontation - which I hate.  Omg the arrogance of the driver.  They refused to say who had given them the alleged permission to park on the private land - unless I proved ownership.  I couldn't believe they could be so objectionable.   They advised they couldn't take public transport to work as they lived too far away.  They couldn't rent a local garage as none were available. I simply said that's their issue not mine. It was infuriating that this person had such misplaced entitlement.  However I decided to humour them and show them the title deeds.   They couldn't respond.  Although at this point they alleged some guy in a city up north - whose name they couldn't remember - gave permission!!    They then asked if they could buy the garages and land!! Yet can't afford to park on a meter !! They seemed to back down and agree to now park elsewhere.  I hope so. 
    • I've worked out the contractor invoiced apx 250k - Without adding vat to the invoices.  So based on above he should have added vat to all invoices once he reached 85k?  Obviously he had to pay his labourers - would those payments get taken off what he received?  Or it doesn't matter cos he invoiced for the high sum?
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Problem with AA repair insurance


Snappie37
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5063 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I hope that someone can give me some advice to pass on to a friend who is having problems with the AA and their car repair insurance scheme.

 

He has a 2000/01 Vauhall Astra diesel estate. He recently noticed oil in the water coolant and took it to his local garage. They diagnosed that the head gasket had gone and that it would be about £800 to repair fully. He had taken out insurance with the AA for such repairs and they sent out a patrol who agreed with the garage. The AA then asked for copies of the car's service history and MOT's before they would authorise payment for the work

On seeing these they rang my friend and asked why at the last MOT the car had initially failed the emissions test but then passed with flying colours afterwards.The answer to this was that the car was serviced in the meantime!! They also queried that the service invoices were hand written rather than computer generated, this being because the garage is small and not even VAT registered.

After a couple of days they wrote to my friend declining his insurance claim on the grounds that the problem with the car was an "ongoing problem" and therefore was not covered!

My friend has paid the bill, as he needs his car back but written "Paid under protest" on the invoice. He has also written to the AA asking how such a problem can be regarded as ongoing but is yet to receive a reply. If they refuse to pay up, as seems likely, what should his next step be?

 

Thanks for any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This really is typical insurance blatantly looking for an excuse not to pay out.

 

You should request where they got the idea it was an ongoing problem and ask them to reconsider in your first letter to them, sent recorded.

 

They are going to have to show that this is an ongoing problem and not just an excuse.

 

How long has he had the car??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, I've got some more details from my friend as to what has actually gone on here. He's had the car 5 years, btw, and had it regularly serviced.

 

The problem with oil in the water coolant was discovered by his little local garage at the time of the latest service and MOT. When he contacted the AA initially they told him that the repair work had to be done by a VAT registered garage. So when the AA patrol came out to confirm the diagnosis of what was wrong, my friend drove the car to another bigger local garage, with the AA van following in case of breakdown.

Over the phone AA Insurance have told my friend that by driving the car, after the discovery of the fault, the fault has become "ongoing"!!!!! But they told him to drive it!!!!..

They have also said that it will take up to eight weeks for them to confirm this is writing as they are "exceptionally busy"........

 

This is just totally unacceptable in my opinion...

Link to post
Share on other sites

They have also said that it will take up to eight weeks for them to confirm this is writing as they are "exceptionally busy"........

 

 

Of course they are exceptionally busy, sending out all those denials of cover.

 

No more phonecalls, this is important. Write to them using recorded delivery and give them 7 days from receipt in which to respond. Check with the Royal Mail tracker that the letter has been received and signed for and print it off with the date.

 

Ask them to confirm that they will cover the bill and if not the reason why. Once you have this in black and white, then you can take it further.

 

This won't be an overnight fix, but you need to do things this way in order that you can be seen to have done things the correct way so that you will be able to issue a small claim against them if it becomes necessary.

 

Tell your friend to have a good read of the warranty terms and conditions and look for a clause that say it must be repaired in a VAT registered garage.

Edited by Conniff
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

The letter was sent on July 24th and signed for on July 26th. I have seen the electronic proof of signature

 

No reply as yet though and its now 8 days since then.

 

The T and C's of the policy do say that it should be a VAT registered garage where any authorised repairs are carried out.

 

What do you think my friends next step should be?

 

Many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did he stipulate a date by which he wanted a response?

 

If not then he should write again and enclose a copy of his original letter for their information and give them 7 days to respond favourably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Obviously they were hoping to get out of it by saying the servicing hadn't been carried out correctly, but by doing that they would bring into disrepute the garage you had it done at, so abandoned that track and went in search of something else.

 

So the conversation in the office will have gone something like 's**t, the servicing is up to date', then another irrelevent will have piped up 'I know, hows about saying it's an ongoing problem because they drove the car'.

 

I think the office layout in these places are, an office with one person in accepting premiums, an office with one person in sending out the policies and an office with 300 people in and the sign on the door saying 'excuses not to pay out department'.

 

So lets confirm - the repairs were carried out at a VAT registered garage?

You have a written bill marked paid from that garage?

The bill was £800 and this is below what the maximum payout from the insurance is?

 

If yes, then email them asking for a response to your letter dated xxx. You can attach a copy of that letter and bill to the email so they can't come up with any excuse about not having seen it.

 

If he hasn't received a response by tomorrow, then on Monday we Post a Letter Before Action.

 

I say letter before action, but is your friend willing to issue a summons in the small claims court? it can be done on line and will cost about £30 which you claim back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, repairs were carried out at a VAT registered garage.

 

He has a written bill, marked paid under protest!

 

The bill was £838 inc VAT. I have checked his policy and the maximum payment is £2000 in 12 months, however the maximum payout on one individual claim is £500 less a £25 excess.

 

So the most he can claim is £475.00 of the £838.00..still better than nothing!

 

He's on holiday for a few days now but I rang him and he is prepared to go to the small claims court. LBA will take a fews days longer to send as a result

 

Thanks again for the advice !

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok Snappie, he has the car back so time won't be an inconvenience except that he can't use the money he paid out.

 

We won't go to court right away, but lets be seen to be doing all possible to come to an amicable settlement with the insurance company before taking that road.

 

The email I mention should be the next contact and asking them to explain what they mean by 'an ongoing problem'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...